참고문헌
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Bae, J., Kim, J., Kim, E., & So, K. (2015). The effect of elementary free inquiry lessons utilizing flipped learning with smart devices on the elementary students’ digital literacy, 21st century skills and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(4), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.4.476
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Oregon: International Society for Technology in Education.
- Bowers, C. (1999). Changing the dominant cultural perspective in education. In G. A. Smith & D. R. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 161-178). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000138833
- Chang, H. S., &Lee, H. J. (2010). College students’ decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
- Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
- Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing student’s communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1),1-27.
- Colucci-Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90(2), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20109
- Dreyfus, A., & Roth, Z. (1991). Twelfth-grade biology pupils’ opinions on interventions of man in nature: Agreement, indifference and ambivalence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1),81-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280108
- Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Osborne, J. (2012). ‘Should we kill the grey squirrels?’A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
- Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
- Grace, M., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1157-1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134848
- Gray, D. S., & Bryce, T. (2006). Socio-scientific issues in science education: Implications for the professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600718489
- Heo, H., Lim, K., Seo, J., & Kim, Y. (2011). Developing 21st century teaching and learning activities for supporting future school 1: Modeling 21st century learner competencies and teacher competencies (KR 2011-2). Korea Education and Research Information Service.
- Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
- Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
- Kim, J., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2016). Effects of socioscientific issues instruction on elementary school students’ character and values as a global citizens. The Journal of Elementary Education, 29(3), 1-25.
- Kim, N., Chun, B., & Choi, J. (2014). A case study of flipped learning at college: Focused on effects of motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 467-492. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.3.467
- Kim, S., Kim, H., Lee, K., & Lee, S. (2000). Focus group method. Seoul: Hyunmoon.
- Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Comparison of the effects of socioscientific issues instruction on promoting college students’ character and values: Based on idiocentrism and allocentrism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.395
- Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity[KOFAC]. (2010). A Study on creativity and character education for fostering talented person to practice caring and sharing. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Lee, M. (2014). Signification of Flipped classroom by sociology of classroom: Focusing on the experience of teachers. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 181-207.
- Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(2), 97-117.
- Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2010). Exploration of experienced science teachers’personal practical knowledge of teaching socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 30(3), 353-365.
- Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
- Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Ko, Y. (2014). Designing collective intelligence-based instructional models for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523
- Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Ko, Y. (2015). Effects of collective intelligence-based SSI instruction on promoting middle school students’ key competencies as citizens. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0431
- Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J. S., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
- Levinson, R. (2004). Teaching bioethics in science: Crossing a bridge too far?. Canadian Journal of Math, Science &Technology Education, 4(3), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556619
- Ministry of Education (2015). Korea national curriculum standards (2015-74). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
- Mun, K., Lee, H., Kim, S. W., Choi, K., Choi, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of perceptions on the global scientific literacy with Australian, Chinese, and Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 437-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9492-y
- Partnership for the 21st Century Skills [P21]. (2009). A framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: P21.
- Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. London: Open University Press.
- Rivero, V. (2013). Flipping out: A new model to reach all students all ways. Internet@Schools, 20(1), 14-16.
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Ruiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. (1999). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572499103278
- Sadler, T. D. (2004a). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sadler, T. D. (2004b). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
- Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Sperling, E., & Bencze, J. L. (2010). “More than particle theory”: Citizenship through school science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 255-266.
- Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
- The Ontario Public Service (2016). 21st century competencies: Foundation document for discussion. Phase 1: Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario. Ontario, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Zeidler, D. L., &Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025