International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Uncertainty assessment for a towed underwater stereo PIV system by uniform flow measurement

  • Han, Bum Woo (Hyundai Maritime Research Institute, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Seo, Jeonghwa (Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Seung Jae (Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seol, Dong Myung (Defense Acquisition Program Administration) ;
  • Rhee, Shin Hyung (Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2015.12.26
  • Accepted : 2017.11.24
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study aims to assess test uncertainty assessment method of nominal wake field measurement by a Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) system in a towing tank. The systematic uncertainty of the SPIV system was estimated from repeated uniform flow measurements. In the uniform flow measurement case, time interval between image frames and uniform flow speed were varied to examine the effects of particle displacement and flow around the SPIV system on the systematic standard uncertainty. The random standard uncertainty was assessed by repeating nominal wake field measurements and the estimated random standard uncertainty was compared with that of laser Doppler velocimetry. The test uncertainty assessment method was applied to nominal wake measurement tests of a very large crude oil carrier model ship. The nominal wake measurement results were compared with existing experimental database by other measurement methods, with its assessed uncertainty.

Keywords

References

  1. Adrian, R.J., Westerweel, J., 2011. Particle Image Velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  2. Anschau, P., Mach, K.P., 2007. Application of a stereo PIV system for investigations of flow fields in towing tank and cavitation tunnel. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 7(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60009-0
  3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2005. Test Uncertainty. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Performance Test Code, 19.1.
  4. Calluaud, D., David, L., 2004. Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of the flow around a surface-mounted block. Exp. Fluids 36 (1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0628-7
  5. Grizzi, S., Pereira, F., Di Felice, F., 2010. A simplified, flow-based calibration method for stereoscopic PIV. Exp. Fluids 48(3), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0750-2
  6. Gui, L., Longo, J., Stern, F., 2001a. Biases of PIV measurement of turbulent flow and the masked correlation-based interrogation algorithm. Exp. Fluids 30(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480000131
  7. Gui, L., Longo, J., Stern, F., 2001b. Towing tank PIV measurement system, data, and uncertainty assessment for DTMB model 5512. Exp. Fluids 31(3), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480100293
  8. International Towing Tank Conference, 2008a. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in experimental hydrodynamics. In: International Towing Tank Conference Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-02-01-01.
  9. International Towing Tank Conference, 2008b. Uncertainty analysis: particle image velocimetry. In: International Towing Tank Conference Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-02-01-01.
  10. International Towing Tank Conference, 2011. Recommended procedures and guidelines: ship models. In: International Towing Tank Conference Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-01-01-01.
  11. Kim, W.J., Van, S.H., Kim, D.H., 2001. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp. Fluids 31(5), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480100332
  12. Kume, K., Hasegawa, J., Tsukada, Y., Fujisawa, J., Fukasawa, R., Hinatsu, M., 2006. Measurements of hydrodynamic forces, surface pressure, and wake for obliquely towed tanker model and uncertainty analysis for CFD validation. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 11(2), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-005-0209-y
  13. Lee, S.J., Kim, H.R., Kim, W.J., Van, S.H., 2003. Wind tunnel tests on flow characteristics of the KRISO 3,600 TEU Containership and 300K VLCC double-deck ship models. J. Ship Res. 47(1), 24-38.
  14. Longo, J., Stern, F., 2005. Uncertainty assessment for towing tank tests with example for surface combatant DTMB model 5415. J. Ship Res. 49(1), 55-68.
  15. Nobach, H., Bodenschatz, E., 2009. Limitations of accuracy in PIV due to individual variations of particle image intensities. Exp. Fluids 47(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0627-4
  16. Raffel, M., Willert, C.E., Kompenhans, J., 1998. Particle Image Velocimetry: a Practical Guide. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  17. Sciacchitano, A., Wieneke, B., Scarano, F., 2013. PIV uncertainty quantification by image matching. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24(4), 045302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/4/045302
  18. Seo, J., Seol, D.M., Han, B., Rhee, S.H., 2016a. Turbulent wake field reconstruction of VLCC models using two-dimensional towed underwater PIV measurements. Ocean. Eng. 118, 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.021
  19. Seo, J., Lee, S.J., Han, B., Rhee, S.H., 2016b. Influence of design parameter variations for propeller-boss-cap-fins on hub vortex reduction. J. Ship Res. 60(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.60.1.140047
  20. Seo, J., Lee, S.J., Choi, W.-S., Park, S.T., Rhee, S.H., 2016c. Experimental study on kinetic energy conversion of horizontal axis tidal stream turbine. Renew. Energy 97, 784-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.041
  21. Seol, D.M., Seo, J., Rhee, S.H., 2013. Towed underwater PIV measurement for freesurface effects on turbulent wake of a surface-piercing body. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 5(3), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0142
  22. Timmins, B.H., Wilson, B.W., Smith, B.L., Vlachos, P.P., 2012. A method for automatic estimation of instantaneous local uncertainty in particle image velocimetry measurements. Exp. Fluids 53(4), 1133-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1341-1
  23. Wilson, B.M., Smith, B.L., 2013. Uncertainty on PIV mean and fluctuating velocity due to bias and random errors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24(3), 035302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/3/035302
  24. Yoon, H., Longo, J., Toda, Y., Stern, F., 2015. Benchmark CFD validation data for surface combatant 5415 in PMM maneuvers - Part II: phase-averaged stereoscopic PIV flow field measurements. Ocean. Eng. 109, 735-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.046

Cited by

  1. 공기윤활시스템 적용 선박의 시운전 속도성능에 대한 불확실성 해석 vol.44, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5394/kinpr.2020.44.6.453
  2. Application of Monte Carlo simulations to uncertainty assessment of ship powering prediction by the 1978 ITTC method vol.13, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.03.006
  3. Uncertainty analysis of speed-power performance based on measured raw data in sea trials vol.13, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.04.001