The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Evaluation Index and Item for Water Environment Improvement of Gyeongin ARA Waterway

경인 아라뱃길의 물환경 개선을 위한 오염원인 평가항목 및 지표 개발

  • 이경수 (국립재난안전연구원) ;
  • 김태형 ((사)한국농식품ICT융복합산업협회)
  • Received : 2018.06.20
  • Accepted : 2018.07.27
  • Published : 2018.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research has developed the criteria and index for systematically and objectively assessing the quality of river water by fixing the various factors that affect Gyeongin ARA waterway's water quality through analysis with the Delphi Technique and analytic hierarchy program (AHP) Method. Based on the results, the highest criteria are, in order of importance, physical and environmental factors 28%, administrative factors 26%, natural fixed factors 26% and finally, cultural and social factors 20%. The three dimensions of the criteria show that for the internal physical and environmental factors, the most important are the loss of self-purification capacity, and the external factors are Gulpocheon and the sludge deposit due to Gyulhweon-weir the bridge. The facility factor in management was affected by the coagulation and waste water disposal facilities. The problem for the policy and institutional factors was seen in the regulatory area. The aquatic ecology/ point pollution source for the natural fixed factors show that it is due to the polluted water of Gulpo-cheon and the living environment/ non-point pollution source is shown through the inflow water from other rivers. Cultural and social factors show that the economical causes were due to the cargo and passenger flight operations and the external factors of having a lack of sewage treatment equipment have an importance effect. In order to estimate the order of priority through logical evidence and objectivity, future research must be continued on the evaluation indexes to measure the specific methodology and technique needed to improve the Gyeongin ARA Waterway.

본 연구에서는 델파이 기법과 AHP분석을 이용하여 경인 아라뱃길의 수질에 영향을 미치는 다양한 인자를 설정하고 하천의 수질을 체계적이고 객관적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가 항목 및 지표를 개발하였다. 분석결과, 최상위 평가항목에서의 중요도는 물리 환경적 요인 28%, 관리적 요인 26%, 자연 고정적 요인 26%, 사회 문화적 요인이 20% 순으로 나타났다. 3계층 평가항목인 물리 환경적 요인의 내적 요인에서는 자정능력의 손실, 외적 요인에서는 귤현보 및 교량에 의한 오니토 퇴적이 중요도가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 관리적 요인의 시설요인에서는 축산 및 폐수처리시설의 영향, 정책/제도적 요인에서는 규제권역상의 문제로 나타났다. 또한 자연 고정적 요인의 수생태/점오염원에서는 굴포천의 오염수, 생활환경/비점오염원은 기타하천의 유입수로 나타났으며, 사회 문화적 요인에서 경제적 요인에서는 화물 및 여객운항, 외적 요인에서는 하수처리시설 부족에 따른 영향이 중요도가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과들은 향후 경인 아라뱃길의 수질개선 사업의 우선순위를 산정할 수 있는 논리적 근거와 객관성을 마련하기 위하여 각각의 평가지표들을 측정할 수 있는 구체적인 방법론과 기법에 대한 연구가 지속되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. A. Jung, C. H. Park, E. T. Jung, and D. K. Koh, "Management Plan for Water Environment of Gyeongin ARA waterway," Korea Water Resources Association, Water For Future, Vol.45, No.12, pp.90-96, 2012.
  2. Korea Water Resources Corporation, Water quality stabilization management at Gyeongin ARA waterway, 2013.
  3. Z. H. Yin and D. I. Seo, "Water Quality Modeling of the Ara Canal, Using EFDC-WASP Model in Series," Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, Vol.32, No.2, pp.101-108, 2013.
  4. J. H. Choi, J. S. Kim, J. H. Kwon, and Y. I. Moon, "Weighting assessment on evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation using the AHP analysis," Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol.49, No.5, pp.381-389, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.381
  5. H. J. Lee and M. P. Shim, "Decision Making for Priority of Water Allocation during Drought by Analytic Hierarchy Process," Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol.35, No.6, pp.703-714, 2002. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2002.35.6.703
  6. M. G. Kang and G. M. Lee, "Development of Assessment Index for Water Resources Sustainability and Weights Evaluation of It's Components," Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol.39, No.1, pp.59-68, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.059
  7. J. S. Yang and I. H. Kim, "Development of Drought Vulnerability Index Using Delphi Method Considering Climate Change and Trend Analysis in Nakdong River Basin," Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.33, No.6, pp.2245-2254, 2013. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.6.2245
  8. K. D. Yeo, Development of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for the Selection of Preferable Alternative and Determination of Investment Priority in Water Resources Projects, Inha university, Doctorate thesis, 2011.
  9. J. S. Park, Development of Classification Model for Decision on Priority for River Water Quality Improvement, Chonnam National University, Doctorate thesis, 2012.
  10. Y. Hur, (An) analysis of the core elements and curriculum evaluation of medical professionalism, Yonsei University, Doctorate thesis, 2006.
  11. J. S. Lee, Study Methods 21 : Delphi Technique, Kyoyookbook, 2001.
  12. S. Y. Rho, Delphi Technique : Prediction the future by Professional Insight, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2006.
  13. L. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychomerika. Vol.16, No.3, pp.297-334, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  14. K. S. Lee, J. K. Jung, B. Y. Heo, and S. J. Byeon, "A Study on the Effect Analysis for the Regeneration Project for the Zones Vulnerable to Natural Disaster using Structural Equation Model," Journal of Water Resources Association, Vol.46, No.8, pp.843-855, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.8.843
  15. H. Lawshe, "A Quantitative approach to content validity," Personnel Psychology, Vol.28, pp.563-575, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  16. Y. J. Jeon, A Study on The Job Performance Competencies of Technology Teacher Regarding Curriculum Education, Chungnam National University, Doctorate thesis, 2005.
  17. T. L. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, 1990.
  18. T. L. Saaty and K. P. Kearns, Analytical Planning: The Organization of System International Series in Modern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol.7, Pergamon Press, 1985.
  19. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The Logic of Priorities: Applications of Business, Energy, Health and Transportation, International Series in Management Science Operations Research, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, The Hague, London, 1982.