Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.39.1-39.20
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature

  • Chockattu, Sherin Jose (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College & Hospital) ;
  • Suryakant, Deepak Byathnal (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Thakur, Sophia (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College & Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.25
  • 심사 : 2018.07.25
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an advanced diagnostic tool used in both medicine and dentistry. Since it functions based on a strong uniform static magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses, it is advantageous over imaging techniques that rely on ionizing radiation. Unfortunately, the magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses generated within the magnetic resonance imager interact unfavorably with dental materials that have magnetic properties. This leads to unwanted effects such as artifact formation, heat generation, and mechanical displacement. These are a potential source of damage to the oral tissue surrounding the affected dental materials. This review aims to compile, based on the current available evidence, recommendations for dentists and radiologists regarding the safety and appropriate management of dental materials during MRI in patients with orthodontic appliances, maxillofacial prostheses, dental implants, direct and indirect restorative materials, and endodontic materials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: principles of Interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2014. Chapter 14.
  2. Tutton LM, Goddard PR. MRI of the teeth. Br J Radiol 2002;75:552-562. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.894.750552
  3. Yilmaz S, Misirlioglu M. The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20130072. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130072
  4. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:18-27. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140103.x
  5. Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW, Mark LP, Hendrix LE, Strandt JA, Williams AL, Haughton VM. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:1149-1155.
  6. Fache JS, Price C, Hawbolt EB, Li DK. MR imaging artifacts produced by dental materials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:837-840.
  7. Sinkiewicz D. MRI scan hazard. Br Dent J 2013;214:376.
  8. Tymofiyeva O, Vaegler S, Rottner K, Boldt J, Hopfgartner AJ, Proff PC, Richter EJ, Jakob PM. Influence of dental materials on dental MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120271. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120271
  9. Kress B, Buhl Y, Anders L, Stippich C, Palm F, Bahren W, Sartor K. Quantitative analysis of MRI signal intensity as a tool for evaluating tooth pulp vitality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:241-244. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/33063878
  10. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Gareis D, Boldt J, Schmid F, Lopez MA, Richter EJ, Jakob PM. In vivo MRI-based dental impression using an intraoral RF receiver coil. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng 2008;33B:244-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20126
  11. Tymofiyeva O, Schmid F, von Kienlin M, Breuer FA, Rottner K, Boldt J, Richter EJ, Jakob PM. On precise localization of boundaries between extended uniform objects in MRI: tooth imaging as an example. MAGMA 2011;24:19-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-010-0229-4
  12. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM, Richter EJ, Proff P. Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:169-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0277-1
  13. Tymofiyeva O, Boldt J, Rottner K, Schmid F, Richter EJ, Jakob PM. High-resolution 3D magnetic resonance imaging and quantification of carious lesions and dental pulp in vivo. MAGMA 2009;22:365-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-009-0188-9
  14. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 2011;37:745-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.022
  15. Bracher AK, Hofmann C, Bornstedt A, Boujraf S, Hell E, Ulrici J, Spahr A, Haller B, Rasche V. Feasibility of ultra-short echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging for identification of carious lesions. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:538-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22828
  16. Hubalkova H, La Serna P, Linetskiy I, Dostalova T. Dental alloys and magnetic resonance imaging. Int Dent J 2006;56:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00085.x
  17. Hu YY, Wei B. Research progress of the MRI artifacts produced by fixed partial dentures. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2008;17:441-443.
  18. Hunt HL. Orthodontic appliances and MRIs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.013
  19. Swash M, Glynn M. Hutchison's clinical methods. 21st ed. New York (NY): Saunders Elsevier; 2007. Chapter 22.
  20. Gorgulu S, Ayyildiz S, Kamburoglu K, Gokce S, Ozen T. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20130356. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130356
  21. Cross B, Beckett H. Unwanted effects. Br Dent J 2006;201:325.
  22. Hasegawa M, Miyata K, Abe Y, Ishii T, Ishigami T, Ohtani K, Nagai E, Ohyama T, Umekawa Y, Nakabayashi S. 3-T MRI safety assessments of magnetic dental attachments and castable magnetic alloys. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20150011. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150011
  23. Beau A, Bossard D, Gebeile-Chauty S. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:105-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju020
  24. Murakami S, Verdonschot RG, Kataoka M, Kakimoto N, Shimamoto H, Kreiborg S. A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20160094. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160094
  25. Abbaszadeh K, Heffez LB, Mafee MF. Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:759-765. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.105942
  26. Beuf O, Lissac M, Cremillieux Y, Briguet A. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging disturbances and the magnetic susceptibility of dental materials. Dent Mater 1994;10:265-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90072-8
  27. Costa AL, Appenzeller S, Yasuda CL, Pereira FR, Zanardi VA, Cendes F. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:E278-E282.
  28. Destine D, Mizutani H, Igarashi Y. Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper. Nippon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 2008;52:205-210. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.52.205
  29. Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA 2005;18:103-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-005-0101-0
  30. Lissac M, Metrop D, Brugirard J, Coudert JL, Pimmel P, Briguet A, Revel D, Amiel M. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1991;26:40-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199101000-00008
  31. Masumi S, Arita M, Morikawa M, Toyoda S. Effect of dental metals on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01519.x
  32. Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. J Dent Res 2003;82:602-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200806
  33. Starcuk Z, Bartusek K, Hubalkova H, Bachorec T, Starcukova J, Krupa P. Evaluation of MRI artifacts caused by metallic dental implants and classification of the dental materials in use. Meas Sci Rev 2006;6:24-27.
  34. Starcukova J, Starcuk Z Jr, Hubalkova H, Linetskiy I. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Dent Mater 2008;24:715-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.07.002
  35. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:75-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880050115
  36. Shellock FG, Woods TO, Crues JV 3rd. MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology. Radiology 2009;253:26-30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2531091030
  37. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:485-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10196
  38. Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2008.
  39. New PF, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, Buonanno FS, Kistler JP, Burt CT, Hinshaw WS, Newhouse JH, Pohost GM, Taveras JM. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983;147:139-148. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.147.1.6828719
  40. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM Standard F2182-09. Standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging [Internet]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2009 [cited year month day]. Available from: http://www.astm.org/ (updated year month day).
  41. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM Standard F2052. Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displaced force on medical devices in magnetic resonance environment [Internet]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2006 [cited year month day]. Available from: http://www.astm.org/ (updated year month day).
  42. Oyar O. The clinical use and indications of magnetic resonance imaging. Harran Univ Tip Fak Derg 2008;5:31-40.
  43. Shellock FG. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:811-814. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.4.811
  44. Devge C, Tjellstrom A, Nellstrom H. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:354-359.
  45. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597854
  46. Klinke T, Daboul A, Maron J, Gredes T, Puls R, Jaghsi A, Biffar R. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials. PLoS One 2012;7:e31766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031766
  47. Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61918-6
  48. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a selfetching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:717-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032
  49. Hinshaw DB Jr, Holshouser BA, Engstrom HI, Tjan AH, Christiansen EL, Catelli WF. Dental material artifacts on MR images. Radiology 1988;166:777-779. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.166.3.3340777
  50. Holton A, Walsh E, Anayiotos A, Pohost G, Venugopalan R. Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002;4:423-430.
  51. Beau A, Bossard D, Gebeile-Chauty S. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. Orthod Fr 2017;88:131-138. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2017004
  52. Blankenstein FH, Asbach P, Beuer F, Glienke J, Mayer S, Zachriat C. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:281-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1788-1
  53. Zhylich D, Krishnan P, Muthusami P, Rayner T, Shroff M, Doria A, Tompson B, Lou W, Suri S. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:484-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.020
  54. Smeets R, Schollchen M, Gauer T, Aarabi G, Assaf AT, Rendenbach C, Beck-Broichsitter B, Semmusch J, Sedlacik J, Heiland M, Fiehler J, Siemonsen S. Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20160267. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160267
  55. Hilgenfeld T, Prager M, Schwindling FS, Heil A, Kuchenbecker S, Rammelsberg P, Bendszus M, Heiland S. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns - Impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI. Eur J Oral Implantology 2016;9:301-308.
  56. Lan G, Yunmin L, Pu W, Haili H. Contrastive analysis of artifacts produced by metal dental crowns in 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging with six sequences. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2016;34:277-280.
  57. Xu Y, Yu R. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of five common dental materials. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015;33:230-233.
  58. Cortes AR, Abdala-Junior R, Weber M, Arita ES, Ackerman JL. Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20150136. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150136
  59. Shalish M, Dykstein N, Friedlander-Barenboim S, Ben-David E, Gomori JM, Chaushu S. Influence of common fixed retainers on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.022
  60. Zachriat C, Asbach P, Blankenstein KI, Peroz I, Blankenstein FH. MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140416. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140416
  61. Wylezinska M, Pinkstone M, Hay N, Scott AD, Birch MJ, Miquel ME. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:610-617. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju103
  62. Blankenstein F, Truong BT, Thomas A, Thieme N, Zachriat C. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging. J Orofac Orthop 2015;76:14-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0258-0
  63. Duttenhoefer F, Mertens ME, Vizkelety J, Gremse F, Stadelmann VA, Sauerbier S. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1195-1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12430
  64. Fang Y, Xin L, Qingyun M, Lu W, Ye S. Effect of oral alloy post and core on magnetic resonance imaging. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2014;32:588-591.
  65. Taniyama T, Sohmura T, Etoh T, Aoki M, Sugiyama E, Takahashi J. Metal artifacts in MRI from nonmagnetic dental alloy and its FEM analysis. Dent Mater J 2010;29:297-302. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-116
  66. Elison JM, Leggitt VL, Thomson M, Oyoyo U, Wycliffe ND. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.038
  67. Blankenstein FH, Truong B, Thomas A, Schroder RJ, Naumann M. Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials. Rofo 2006;178:787-793. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-926817
  68. Harris TM, Faridrad MR, Dickson JA. The benefits of aesthetic orthodontic brackets in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning. J Orthod 2006;33:90-94. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021465
  69. Okano Y, Yamashiro M, Kaneda T, Kasai K. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:255-263. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.37
  70. Hubalkova H, Hora K, Seidl Z, Krasensky J. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:125-130.
  71. Savane S, N'Dindin AC, N'Dindin GB, Kouame PA, Doyon D. Artifacts induced by dental reconstruction materials: the case of titanium. Odontostomatol Trop 2001;24:33-37.
  72. Tetsumura A, Honda E, Sasaki T, Kino K. Metallic residues as a source of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:186-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600429
  73. Borris TJ, Weber CR. Ferromagnetic MRI artifact secondary to a previous mandibular modified condylotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37:104-105. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1997.0082
  74. Behr M, Fellner C, Bayreuther G, Leibrock A, Held P, Fellner F, Handel G. MR-imaging of the TMJ: artefacts caused by dental alloys. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1996;4:111-115.
  75. Iimuro FT. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts and the magnetic attachment system. Dent Mater J 1994;13:76-88. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.76
  76. Oikarinen KS, Nieminen TM, Makarainen H, Pyhtinen J. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80818-5
  77. Laurell KA, Gegauff AG, Rosenstiel SF. Magnetic resonance image degradation from prosthetic magnet keepers. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90347-8
  78. Sadowsky PL, Bernreuter W, Lakshminarayanan AV, Kenney P. Orthodontic appliances and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and temporomandibular joint. Angle Orthod 1988;58:9-20.
  79. Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls RH. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier/Saunders; 2013. Chapter 15.
  80. Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA, Zamiri B, Sadeghi AR, Bagheri MH, Javadpour S. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:470-474. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30077669
  81. Bates LF, Tai LC. The magnetic properties of amalgams. Proc Phys Soc 1936;48:795-809. https://doi.org/10.1088/0959-5309/48/5/312
  82. Bates LF, Ireland AW. The magnetic properties of silver amalgams. Proc Phys Soc 1937;49:642-645. https://doi.org/10.1088/0959-5309/49/6/302

피인용 문헌

  1. Imaging of root canal treatment using ultra high field 9.4T UTE-MRI - a preliminary study vol.49, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190183
  2. Implications and Considerations of Dental Materials in MRI: A Case Report and Literature Review vol.2020, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8891302
  3. Magnetic resonance imaging based COMPUTER‐GUIDED dental implant surgery-A clinical pilot study vol.22, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12939
  4. Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry vol.49, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00333f
  5. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries vol.49, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200121
  6. An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review vol.7, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7050075
  7. Implant-supported overdentures: part 1 vol.231, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3224-4
  8. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for periodontal disease: A prospective study with correlation to standard clinical findings—Is there added value? vol.48, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13458
  9. The interaction and interference of preformed metal crowns on magnetic resonance imaging: a scoping review with a systematic methodology vol.22, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00644-z
  10. Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods vol.14, pp.24, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247829
  11. Techniques, Tricks, and Stratagems of Oral Cavity Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging vol.12, pp.3, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031473