Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.38.1-38.9
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases

  • Tzimas, Konstantinos (Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) ;
  • Tsiafitsa, Maria (Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) ;
  • Gerasimou, Paris (Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) ;
  • Tsitrou, Effrosyni (Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.13
  • 심사 : 2018.07.09
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 2008;39:117-129.
  2. Rocca GT, Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth: from direct composite to endocrowns. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013;8:156-179.
  3. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:83-94.
  4. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:255-265.
  5. Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:446-455. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.00.0601
  6. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-136. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-105-L
  7. Bindl A, Richter B, Mormann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:219-224.
  8. Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:646-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023
  9. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Roig M, Krejci I. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth: analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2013;38:663-673. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-208-L
  10. Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc 2013;79:d140.
  11. Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent 2017;63:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009
  12. Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance. J Prosthodont 2017 Oct 6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12671. [Epub ahead of print]
  13. Jotkowitz A, Samet N. Rethinking ferrule--a new approach to an old dilemma. Br Dent J 2010;209:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.580
  14. Ma PS, Nicholls JI, Junge T, Phillips KM. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60159-1
  15. Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, Mehl AC, Probst FA. Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians' design. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:491-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0714-4
  16. Dias MC, Martins JN, Chen A, Quaresma SA, Luis H, Carames J. Prognosis of indirect composite resin cuspal coverage on endodontically treated premolars and molars: an in vivo prospective study. J Prosthodont 2016 Sep 23. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12545. [Epub ahead of print]
  17. da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: a functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:131-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.006
  18. Mahesh B, Vandana G, Sanjay P, Jaykumar G, Deepika C, Aatif N. Endocrown: conservative treatment modality for restoration of endodontically treated teeth - a case report. Endodontology 2015;27:188-191.
  19. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.018
  20. Gaintantzopoulou MD, El-Damanhoury HM. Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture endocrowns. Oper Dent 2016;41:607-616. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-146-L
  21. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
  22. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40:201-210. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-143-L
  23. Gresnigt MM, Ozcan M, van den Houten ML, Schipper L, Cune MS. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater 2016;32:607-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.004
  24. Shin Y, Park S, Park JW, Kim KM, Park YB, Roh BD. Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.025
  25. Bernhart J, Brauning A, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Cerec3D endocrowns--two-year clinical examination of CAD/CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars. Int J Comput Dent 2010;13:141-154.
  26. Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00704.x
  27. Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: a boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014;4:200-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2014.11.008
  28. Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40:125-133.
  29. Magne P, Knezevic A. Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40:729-737.
  30. Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Munchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016;52:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005
  31. Otto T, Mormann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:147-161.

피인용 문헌

  1. Indications and Success Rate of Endo Crowns - A Systematic Review vol.9, pp.43, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/712
  2. A Thorough Analysis of the Endocrown Restoration: A Literature Review vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3075
  3. Full‐Crown Versus Endocrown Approach: A 3D‐Analysis of Both Restorations and the Effect of Ferrule and Restoration Material vol.30, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13244
  4. Fractography of clinical failures of indirect resin composite endocrown and overlay restorations vol.37, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.02.002