International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology

Research Institute for Knowledge Content Development & Technology (건국대학교 지식콘텐츠연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Challenges of Accessibility to Information Resources by Prison Inmates

  • Received : 2018.04.10
  • Accepted : 2018.05.18
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Prisons are mostly filled with social deviants and like other correctional institutions, deserve organized information (provision) centers such as library. A study on library resource needs and accessibility by prison inmates was conducted at Kuje prison, Abuja and Kaduna prison, Kaduna, Nigeria, both of which have functional libraries. A sample of 898 inmates was randomly selected from all the convicted inmates in the two prisons. A total of 106 inmates were selected from Kuje prison and 792 from Kaduna prison. A well-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the inmates. All the 898 inmates responded. A total of 786 (87.9%) males and 112 (12.4%) females were involved in the study. With regards to the educational level attained by the inmates, 347 (38.6%) had Junior Secondary School Certificate while 323 (30.0%) had Senior School Certificate both accounting for 74.6% of the sampled population. In areas of information needs, 94.5%, 96.1%, 98.7%, 99.4%, 100%, and 100% of the respondents indicated that information on current affairs, survival and coping, educational support, legal aid, skill acquisition, and health, respectively were highly needed by the inmates. Out of the 12 information resources listed, only newspaper, novel, handbook and manual, and bulletin were readily accessible with percentage accessibility of 60.7, 7.8, 6.8, and 1.9, respectively. One major reason adduced by the respondents for limited access to information resources was the very strict rules and regulations in the prison. Providing more library resources and granting the inmates more access to the library would assist in character reformation and rehabilitation of the inmates.

Keywords

References

  1. Agolu, C. C., & Aguolu, I. E. (2002). Libraries and Information Management in Nigeria. Maiduguiri: EdLinform Services.
  2. American Library Association (2010). Prisoners right to read. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/prisonersrightoread
  3. Andenaes, J. (1968). Does punishment deter crime? Criminal Law Quarterly, 11, 76-93.
  4. Araromi M. A. (2015). Prisoners' Right under the Nigerian Law: legal pathways to progressive realization and protection. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 6(1), 170-198.
  5. Budd, R. W. (1987). Limiting access to information: A view from the leeward side. The Information Society, 5, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1987.9960043
  6. Campbell, D. K. (2005). The Context of the Information behavior of Prison inmates. Progressive Librarian, 26. Retrieved from http://libr.org/pl/26_campbell.html.
  7. Chiemezie, E. A. (2005). Penological Parliament. The Reformer, 2(1), 8.
  8. Gbashima, N. C., Akpe, P. D., & Iorfa, T. (2016). Information Needs and Resources Utilization by Inmates in Medium Security Prison, Makurdi, Benue State. International Journal of Academic Library and Information Science, 4(10), 299-306.
  9. Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2006). The implementation and maintenance of quality services in offender rehabilitation programmes. Offending behaviour programmes: Development, application, and controversies, 209-246.
  10. Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1989). Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(6), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198911)40:6<386::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-V
  11. Hudson, H. E. (1988). Ending the tyranny of distance: the impact of new America. In Schement, J. R. & Lievrouw, L. A. (eds). Competing Visions, Complex Realities: Social Aspect of the Information Society. Norwood, New Jersy: Ablex, 91-104. Retrieved from http://www.aallnet.org/mm/Publications/spectrum/archives/Vol-20/No-4/Feature-Right-Of-Access-For-Prisoners.pdf
  12. Iyoro, A. O. (2004). Serial availability, accessibility and utilisation: perceptions of in-training information professionals in a Nigerian Universities. The Nigerian Library Link, 11(2), 66-71.
  13. Jordet, J. (2008). Reading and Prison Libraries.Corrections.com. (9) 2008. Retrieved from http://www.corrections.com/news/article/19578.
  14. Kantor, P. B. (1982). Evaluation of and feedback in information storage and retrieval systems. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 17, 99-120.
  15. Kraut, R. E. (1989). Telecommunicating: The trade-offs of homework. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01038.x
  16. Lee, J., Burneth, J. H. B., Vandegrift, M., & Morris, R. J. (2015). Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository: A case study. Faculty Publications The School of Information. Retrieved from https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:252681/datastream/PDF
  17. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Crossdisciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 45-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00037-5
  18. Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In M. Tonry Eds. Crime and justice: a review of research, 23, 1-42 Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Neelamegham, A. (1981). Some issues in information transfer: a Third World perspective. IFLA Journal, 7(1), 9-13.
  20. Ogunesan, F. O. (2005). Public access to government information: socio-political contexts and initiatives. In Tiamiyu, M. A. (ed). Information Science: Concepts, Models and Applications, 1, 169-205. Ibadan: African Regional Centre for Information Science.
  21. Omagbemi, C. O., & Odunewu, A. O. (2008). An apraisal of library services provisions to prison inmates in Nigeria. Journal of Information, Society, Justice, 1(2), 245-254.
  22. Orsagh, T., & Chen, J. R. (1988). The effect of time served on recidivism: an interdisciplinary theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062871
  23. Prisoners' Right to Read (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/prisonersrightoread.
  24. Pyle, D. J. (1995). Cutting the cost of crime: the economics of crime and criminal justice. London, U. K.: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  25. Strasbourg (1990). Education in Prison. Legal Affairs. (89) 12. Retrieved from www.exocop.eu/sixcms/media.php/13/CoE_1989_Education_In_Prison.pdf
  26. Turn, R. (1985). Privacy Protection. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20, 27-41.
  27. Ugah, A. D. (2008). Availability and accessibility of information resources and use of library services at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal).
  28. United Nations (1995). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36e8.html.
  29. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E. Bumey. E., & Wikstrom, P. O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: an analysis of recent research. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
  30. Wikipedia (2012). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights
  31. Womboh, B. H. S. (1991). Nigerian Prison library services: status and needs. Focus on International and Comparative Librarianship, 22(1), 10-15.
  32. Wood, P., & Grasmick, H. (1999). Towards the development of punishment equivalences. Justice Quarterly, 16, 19-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094041