Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring housing consumption adjustment of pre-retirees after retirement using ordered probit model in terms of different housing size

순위프로빗모형을 이용한 예비은퇴자의 주택소비 조정 의향 결정요인 분석 - 주택규모의 변화를 중심으로 -

  • Lee, So-Young (Department of Real Estate, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hyun (Department of Real Estate, Hanyang Cyber University) ;
  • Choi, Youn-Young (Department of Youth Studies, Hanyang Cyber University)
  • 이소영 (건국대학교 부동산학) ;
  • 김지현 (한양사이버대학교 부동산학과) ;
  • 최윤영 (한양사이버대학교 청소년상담학과)
  • Received : 2018.04.24
  • Accepted : 2018.06.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, there is a growing interest in housing policy to prepare for the aging society. The purpose of this study is exploring the factors that explain housing consumption and adjustment of pre-retirees after retirement. 1,351 samples were collected from A bank and analyzed. There categories of housing consumption adjustment were considered including downsizing, maintain, and upsizing. Gender, educational level, housing size, housing type, asset size, and willingness to work after retirement were examined to see if they can explain the housing consumption adjustment of pre-retirees using orderd- probit model. The finding of this study is that housing size, asset size, and willingness to work after retirement statistically significantly explain the housing consumption adjustment. At specific, firstly, if the current size of the housing is relatively large, it is highly likely to downsize housing after retirement. Second, pre-retiree whose assets exceeded 1 billion won were more likely to scale up housing than assets of over 300 million to less than 500 million won. Lastly, unless there is absolutely no willingness to work after retirement, it is indicated that it intends to up-sizing consumption rather than down-sizing adjustment. The results of this study can provide useful information for the housing policy in order to prepare for the (post) aged society.

본 연구에서는 예비 은퇴자의 은퇴 후 주택소비 조정 의향에 대한 결정요인을 탐색하였다. 연구방법으로 전국의 A은행에서 수집된 1,351명의 은퇴 후 주택소비 조정 의향에 대한 설문자료를 활용하여 분석을 실시하였다. 주택소비 조정의 범주는 다운사이징, 유지, 업사이징으로 구분하였고 이를 설명하기 위한 요인으로 성별, 교육수준, 주택규모, 주택유형, 자산규모, 은퇴 후 근로의지 등을 고려하여 순위프로빗 모형으로 추정하였다. 연구결과, 은퇴 후 주택소비 조정은 주로 주택 규모, 자산 규모, 은퇴 후 근로의지에 의해 영향을 받는 것으로 추정되었다. 구체적으로 첫째, 현재 주택 규모가 상대적으로 크면 은퇴 후 주택 소비를 하향 조정(다운사이징)할 가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 자산 규모가 10억원을 초과하는 응답자는 3억원 초과~5억원 이하의 자산을 보유한 응답자에 비해 주택 소비를 상향 조정(업사이징)할 가능성이 높은 것으로 추정되었다. 셋째, 은퇴 후 근로의지가 전혀 없는 경우가 아니라면 주택소비를 하향 조정하기보다 상향 조정하고자 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 고령화에 따른 향후 주택시장의 정책을 위한 정보를 제공할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YJ. 2013. A Study on Factors that affect the Housing Downsizing of the Elderly Households. Korea Real Estate Review. 23(3): 235-254.
  2. Kim YJ, Son JY. 2014. Determinants of Housing Downsizing among the Older Homeowners. Housing Studies. 22(1): 29-57.
  3. Kim HS, Sung JH, Yoon YS. 2016. A Study on the Determining factor of Living Area Fluctuation in the Metropolitan Area Resident Retirees. Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association. 29(3): 39-62.
  4. Kim HS, Choi MS. 2013. Study on Residential Satisfaction According to the Retired Population's Recent Changes in Residential Area: Focus on retirees mainly between the 50-60 years old, living in Seoul and metropolitan areas. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea. 12(1): 19-37.
  5. Jang IS. 2017. Challenges for stable job security for the elderly and expansion of labor demand. Labor Review. 144: 22-30.
  6. Chung EC. 2013. Housing Tenure Transition Decisions of Older Homeowners in Korea. The Korea Spatial Planning Review. 77: 119-136. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2013.77..008
  7. Chung EC. 2016. Do They Trade Down or Trade Up? Housing Adjustments of Older Homeowners in Korea. Housing Studies. 24(2): 129-154.
  8. Chung EC, Lee KA. 2013. Residential Mobility and Housing Tenure Choice Decisions of Older Homeowners. Housing Studies. 21(3): 37-60.
  9. Statistics Korea. 2017. Population Projections(2015-2065).
  10. Ando A, Modigliani F. 1963. The "life cycle" hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. The American Economic Review. 53(1): 55-84.
  11. Artle R, Varaiya P. 1978. Life Cycle Consumption and Homeownership. Journal of Economic Theory. 18(1): 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90041-8
  12. Banks J, Blundell R, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. 2007. Housing price volatility and downsizing in later life. NBER Working Paper W13496. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  13. Banks J, Blundell R, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. 2010. Housing price volatility and downsizing in later life. Research findings in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press. 337-379.
  14. Beer A, Faulkner D, Gabriel M. 2006. 21st Century housing careers and Australia's housing future: Literature review. AHURI Research Paper No. NRV2-1. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.
  15. Berheim BD. 1991. How Strong Are Bequest Motives? Evidence Based on Estimates of the Demand for Life Insurance and Annuities. Journal of Political Economy. 99(5): 899-927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261783
  16. Bradbury B. 2010. Asset rich, but income poor: Australian housing wealth and retirement in an international context. Social Policy Research Paper No. 41. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
  17. Calvo E, Haverstick K, Zhivan NA. 2009. Determinants and consequences of moving decisions for older Americans. 11th Annual Joint Conference of the Retirement Research Consortium Working Paper. Boston: Center for Retirement Research.
  18. Chiuri MC, Jappelli T. 2010. Do the Elderly Reduce Housing Equity? An international comparison. Journal of Population Economics. 23(2): 643-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0217-4
  19. Clark W, Deurloo M, Dieleman, F. 1994. Tenure changes in the context of micro-level family and macro-level economic shifts. Urban Studies. 31(1): 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420080081
  20. Ermisch JF, Jenkins SP. 1999. Retirement and Housing Adjustment in Later Life: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Labour Economics. 6(2): 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(99)00018-4
  21. Faulkner D. 2001. Linkages among housing assistance, residential (re)location and use of community health and social care among old-old adults: shelter and non-shelter implications for housing policy development. AHURI Positioning Paper No. 15. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.
  22. Faulkner D. 2007. The Older Population and Changing Housing Careers: Implications for Housing Provision. Australian Journal on Ageing. 26(4): 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2007.00245.x
  23. Feinstein J, McFadden D. 1989. The Dynamics of Housing Demand by the Elderly: Wealth, Cash Flow, and Demographic Effects. The Economics of Aging. University of Chicago Press. 55-92.
  24. Ferraro KF. 1981. Relocation desires and outcomes among the elderly: A longitudinal analysis. Research on Aging. 3(2): 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/016402758132003
  25. Gobillon L, Wolff FC. 2011. Housing and Location Choices of Retiring Households: Evidence from France. Urban Studies. 48(2): 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010363493
  26. Heiss F, Hurd MD, Borsch-Supan AH. 2005. Healthy, wealthy, and knowing where to live. Analyses in the economics of aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 241-280.
  27. Helderman AC. 2007. Once a homeowner, always a homeowner? An analysis of moves out of owner-occupation. Journal of housing and the built environment. 22(3): 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-007-9085-6
  28. Hurd MD. 1990. Research on the Elderly: Economic Status, Retirement, and Consumption and Saving. Journal of Economic Literature. 28(2): 565-637.
  29. Jones LD. 1997. The Tenure Transition Decision For Elderly Homeowners. Journal of Urban Economics. 41(2): 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.1099
  30. Judd B, Bridge C, Davy L, Adams T, Liu E. 2012. Downsizing amongst older Australians. AHURI Positioning Paper No. 150. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.
  31. Kazi PM. 2008. Essays on retirement and the residential choice of the elderly. Michigan State University, Economics.
  32. Lehnert A. 2004. Housing, Consumption, and Credit Constraints. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Divisions of Research and Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board.
  33. Levin L. 1998. Are Assets Fungible? Testing the Behavioral Theory of Life-Cycle Saving. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 36(1): 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00070-5
  34. Luborsky M, Lysack C, Van Nuil J. 2011. Refashioning One's Place in Time: Stories of Household Downsizing in Later Life. Journal of Aging Studies. 25(3): 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.009
  35. Megbolugbe I, Sa-Aadu J, Shilling JD. 1997. Oh, Yes, the Elderly Will Reduce Equity under the Right Circumstances. Journal of Housing Research. 8(1): 53-74.
  36. Megbolugbe I, Sa-Aadu J, Shilling JD. 1999. Elderly female-headed households and the decision to trade down. Journal of Housing Economics. 8(4): 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhec.1999.0255
  37. Merrill S. 1984. Home equity and the elderly. Retirement and economic behavior. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. 197-225.
  38. Meyer JW, Speare Jr A. 1985. Distinctively elderly mobility: Types and determinants. Economic Geography. 61(1): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/143676
  39. Munnell A, Soto M, Aubry JP. 2007. Do People Plan to Tap Their Home Equity in Retirement?. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
  40. Painter G, Lee K. 2009. Housing Tenure Transitions of Older Household: Life Cycle Demographic, and Familial Factors. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 39(6): 749-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.07.006
  41. Painter G, Lee K. 2010. Housing Choices in Aging Households: The Influence of Life Cycle, Demographics, and Family. Research Brief. USC LUSK Centre for Real Estate.
  42. Reschovsky J. 1990. Residential immobility of the elderly: An empirical investigation. Real Estate Economics. 18(2): 160-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00515
  43. Sheiner L, Weil DN. 1992. The Housing Wealth of the Aged. NBER Working Paper No. 4115. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  44. Skinner JS. 1996. Is Housing Wealth a Sideshow?. Advances in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago. 241-272.
  45. Tastiramos K. 2006. Residential Mobility and Housing Adjustment of Older Household in Europe. IZA Discussion Papers No. 2435. Institute for the Study of Labor.
  46. Thaler RH. 1990. Anomalies Savings, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 4(1): 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.1.193
  47. Venti SF, Wise DA. 1989. Aging, Moving, and Housing Wealth. The Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago. 9-54.
  48. Venti SF, Wise DA. 1990. But They Don't Want to Reduce Housing Equity. Issues in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  49. Venti SF, Wise DA. 2004. Aging and Housing Equity: Another Look. Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago. 127-180.