DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis and Adjustments of LOSA Program Codes Types for Pilot Error Managements

조종사 Error 대응을 위한 LOSA 프로그램 코드유형 분석 및 변환

  • Choi, Jin KooK (Department of Aeronautical Science and Flight Operation, Far East University) ;
  • Kim, Dae Ho (Safety Research Department, the Republic of Korea Air Force Aviation Safety Agency)
  • Received : 2018.04.29
  • Accepted : 2018.06.12
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Objective: The Purpose of this paper is to analyze and adjust the LOSA codes types in consideration of the characteristics and environment for the aviation organization with proactive aviation safety. Background: It may be required to analyze and adjust the LOSA codes for effective collection standards. It could better serve to identify the threats and Errors of the characteristics of the organizations for effective data collection. Method: It is analyze and adjusted for the threats and Errors codes on transportation purpose through the monitoring the flight operation and consulting from aviation safety specialists. The qualitative verifications are done by the domestic and international subject matter experts. Results: The analysis and adjustments on the threats and Errors codes types are made through in consideration of the flight environments. Conclusion: The LOSA has been promoted by international organizations as ICAO, IATA, FAA and IFAPA. It is required to implement LOSA as proactive safety tool to identify actual threats and Error of the cockpit for better management of human factors in safety management system with adjusted types of threats. Application: The aviation organizations are expected to manage aviation safety efficiently implementing LOSA by enhancing the safety change process before the accidents and incident occurs. The actual behavior of the crew can be identified explained through the narrations for improvements on standard procedures and training based on the evidence using types adjusted on this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Air Canada, Corporative sustainability Report 2013, 16, 2014.
  2. Choi, J.K. and Kim, C.Y., A study on the characteristics on the Error of the flight crew, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 17(2), 62-67, 2009.
  3. Choi, J.K. and Kim, C.Y., A Study of the Threats towards the Flight Crew, Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation & Aeronautics, 18(2), 54-59, 2010.
  4. Choi, J.K., Kim, D.H. and Choi, Y.C., Safety Change Process with LOSA, Spring Conference Proceedings of the Korean Society for Aviation & Aeronautics, 90-92, 2017.
  5. FAA, AC 120-90 Line Operations Safety Audits (LOSA), 2006.
  6. Helmreich, R. and Klinect, J., System Safety and Threat and Error Management: LOSA, 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio, 2001.
  7. ICAO, Doc 9803 Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA), International Civil Aviation Organization, 2-2, 2-3 2002.
  8. ICAO, Safety Report, 2016.
  9. Kim, D.H., Effort and Development Direction of Aviation Organization against Human Errors, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(1), 29-39, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.29
  10. Klinect, J., Murray, P., Merrit, A. and Helmreich, R., LOSA: Definition and Operation Characteristics, the University of Texas Human Factors Research Project, TLC, Austin Texas, 2003.
  11. KOTI, Development Plan for Accident Prevention Technology for Transportation Aircraft, 2013.
  12. Maurino, D., LOSA now central focus of ICAO's flight safety and human factors programme, ICAO Journal Vol. 57, p.5, 2002.
  13. Maurino, D., Threat and Error Management, Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar, Vancouver, BC, p.1, 2005.
  14. The LOSA Collaborative, http://www.losacollaborative.org/civil-aviation-airlines/
  15. US AF, AFI 11-290, Cockpit/Crew Resource Management Training Program, 2012.