DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Different Marination Conditions on Quality, Microbiological Properties, and Sensory Characteristics of Pork Ham Cooked by the Sous-vide Method

  • Jeong, Kiyoung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Korea University) ;
  • O, Hyeonbin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, So Yeon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Korea University)
  • Received : 2018.01.26
  • Accepted : 2018.04.30
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of marinade under different conditions (temperature and vacuum) on pork ham cooked by the sous-vide method ($61^{\circ}C$ and 98.81% vacuum for 45 min). Control group was non-marinade pork ham. The samples were marinated under 1 of 4 conditions: $4^{\circ}C$, 98.81% vacuum (treatment group $T_1$); $4^{\circ}C$, atmospheric pressure ($T_2$); $20^{\circ}C$, 98.81% vacuum ($T_3$); and $20^{\circ}C$, atmospheric pressure ($T_4$). The pH value was higher in the control (6.02) than in the treatment groups (4.30-4.42, p<0.001). Shear force was the lowest in the control: 18.14 N. Lightness and redness values were higher in the control (p<0.001). The chroma value significantly decreased from 12.74 to 7.55 with marinade (p<0.001). Total viable and coliform counts of raw meat were 84.6 and 3.67 Log CFU/g, respectively. After the marinade, the total viable count decreased to 3.00-14.67 Log CFU/g (p<0.001). Coliforms were not detected. After sous-vide cooking, no viable microorganisms were detected in any group. Treatment groups generally showed high scores on consumer preference. The marinade and sous-vide cooking had a positive effect on sensory characteristics. They provided safe conditions for sanitary evaluation. As a result, it appears that marinade at refrigeration temperature is better than that at room temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. Alahakoon AU, Jayasena DD, Yong HI, Bae YS, Kang HJ, Moon SS, Lee KH, Jo C. 2014. Effects of different natural antimicrobial agents on marinated chicken breast during storage at different temperatures. Korean J Food Nutr 27:164-174. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.2.164
  2. American Meat Science Association. 1995. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, USA. p 8.
  3. Bourne MC. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol 32:62-66.
  4. Burke RM, Monahan FJ. 2003. The tenderisation of shin beef using a citrus juice marinade. Meat Sci 63:161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00062-1
  5. Christensen L, Ertbjerg P, Aaslyng MD, Christensen M. 2011. Effect of prolonged heat treatment from $48^{\circ}C$ to $63^{\circ}C$ on toughness, cooking loss and color of pork. Meat Sci 88:280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.035
  6. Creed PG. 1998. Sensory and nutritional aspects of sous vide processed foods. In Sous vide and cook-chill processing for the food industry. Ghazala S (ed). Aspen Publishers Inc., Maryland, USA.
  7. Gao T, Li J, Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ma R, Song L, Gao F, Zhou G. 2015. Effect of different tumbling marination treatments on the quality characteristics of prepared pork chops. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 28:260-267.
  8. Gault NFS. 1984. The linfluence of acetic acid concentration on the efficiency of marinading as a process for tendering beef. Proceedings of the 30th European Meeting of Meat Research Workers. Bristol, UK. pp 184-185.
  9. Goli T, Bohuon P, Ricci J, Collignan A. 2012. Evolution of pH during immersion of meat protein matrices in acidic marinades. Meat Sci 90:618-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.10.003
  10. Harold MG. 2010. On food and cooking: The science and lore of the kitchen. Scribner, USA, p 131.
  11. He FY, Kim HW, Hwang KE, Song DH, Kim YJ, Ham YK, Kim SY, Yeo IJ, Jung TJ, Kim CJ. 2015. Effect of ginger extract and citric acid on the tenderness of duck breast muscles. Korean J Food Sci An 35:721-730. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.721
  12. Honikel KO. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 49:447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
  13. Jeon MS, Shim JW, Yoon S. 2013. Effect of different cooking methods and temperatures on physicochemical and sensory properties of pork hams: Ocoo, sous-vide, steaming, and boiling. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 29:309-316. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.3.309
  14. Jin SK, Choi JS, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Hur SJ. 2016. Effect of thyme and rosemary on the quality characteristics, shelf-life, and residual nitrite content of sausages during cold storage. Korean J Food Sci An 36:656-664. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.5.656
  15. Jouki M. Khazaei N. 2011. Effects of storage time on some characteristics of packed camel meat in low temperature. Int J Anim Vet Adv 3:460-464.
  16. Ju HW. 2011. Quality evaluation of marinade mackerel with rosemary extract. Culi Sci Hos Res 17:221-230.
  17. Khan MI, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Young HI, Lee H, Jo C. 2016. Marination and physicochemical characteristics of vacuum-aged duck breast meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 29:1639-1945. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.1053
  18. Kim DJ, Lee DH, Lee YG, Park DW, Kim GD, Jung EY, Seo HW, Jeong JY, Joo ST, Yang HS. 2012. The relationship between carcass color grade and instrumental values. J Agri Life Sci 46:133-139.
  19. Kim HY, Kim KJ, Lee JW, Kim GW, Choe JH, Kim HW, Yoon Y, Kim CJ. 2015. Quality characteristics of marinated chicken breast as influenced by the methods of mechanical processing. Korean J Food Sci An 35:101-107. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.1.101
  20. Kim SW, Cha GH. 2015. Comparative analysis on the effect of beef tenderizers in Joseon Dynasty. J Korean Soc Food Cult 30:313-323. https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2015.30.3.313
  21. Kim IS, Jang AR, Jin SK, Lee MH, Jo CR. 2008. Effect of marination with mixed salt and kiwi juice and cooking methods on the quality of pork loin-based processed meat product. J Korea Soc Food Sci Nutr 37:217-222. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.2.217
  22. Kim JH, Kwon HJ, Lee KH, Chun SS, Kwon OJ, Woo HS, Cho YJ, Cha WS. 2006. Inhibitory effect against Helicobacter pylori and biological activity of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) extracts. Appl Biol Chem 49:243-247.
  23. Knispel G. 1991. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 22:525-531.
  24. Lombard R, Lanier T. 2011. Marinade composition and vacuum effects on liquid uptake and retention in tumbled fish portions. J Aquat Food Prod T 20:117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2010.549605
  25. Lytou AE, Panagou EZ, Nychas GJE. 2017. Effect of different marinating conditions on the evolution of spoilage microbiota and metabolomic profile of chicken breast fillets. Food Microbiology 66:141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.04.013
  26. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2013. Korean food code. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong, Korea.
  27. Nimeroff I 1968. Colorimetry. National Bureau of Standards Monograph, Washington, USA. pp 4-32.
  28. Sanchez del Pulgar J, Gazquez A, Ruiz-Carrascal J. 2012. Physico-chemical, textural and structural characteristics of sousvide cooked pork cheeks as affected by vacuum, cooking temperature, and cooking time. Meat Sci 90:828-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.024
  29. Seong PN, Kim JH, Cho SH, Kang GH, Park BY, Park KM, Kim DH, Kim DJ. 2012. The effects of marinating with commercial vinegars on the quality characteristics of biceps femoris muscle on Hanwoo. Ann Anim Resour Sci 23:26-32.
  30. Tokifuji A, Matsushima Y, Hachisuka K, Yoshioka K. 2013. Texture, sensory and swallowing characteristics of highpressure-heat-treated pork meat gel as a dysphagia diet. Meat Sci 93:843-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.050
  31. Topuz OK, Yerlikaya P, Ucak I, Gumus B, Buyukbenli HA. 2014. Effects of olive oil and olive oil-pomegranate juice sauces on chemical, oxidative and sensorial quality of marinated anchovy. Food Chem 154:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.103
  32. Tornberg E. 2005. Effects of heat on meat proteins - Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci 70:493-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.021
  33. U-chupaj J, Malila Y, Petracci M, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W. 2017. Effect of tumbling marination on marinade uptake of chicken carcass and parts quality. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 19:61-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0380
  34. Vaudagna SR, Pazos AA, Guidi SM, Sanchez G, Carp DJ, Gonzalez CB. 2008. Effect of salt addition on sous vide cooked whole beef muscles from Argentina. Meat Sci 79:470-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.11.001
  35. Wang SH, Chang MH, Chen TC. 2004. Shelf-life and microbiological profiler of chicken wing products following sous vide treatment. Int J Anim Vet Adv 3:326-332.
  36. Wheeler TL, Savell JW, Cross HR, Lunt DK, Smith SB. 1990. Mechanisms associated with the variation in tenderness of meat from Brahman and Hereford cattle. J Food Sci 68:4206-4220.
  37. Yusop SM, O'Sullivan MG, Kerry JF, Kerry JP. 2010. Effect of marinating time and low pH on marinade performance and sensory acceptability of poultry meat. Meat Sci 85:657-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.020
  38. Zochowska-Kujawska J, Lachowicz K, Sobczak M. 2012. Effects of fibre type and kefir, wine lemon, and pineapple marinades on texture and sensory properties of wild boar and deer longissimus muscle. Meat Sci 92:675-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.06.020

Cited by

  1. Effect of Different Storage-Temperature Combinations on Longissimus dorsi Quality upon Sous-vide Processing of Frozen/Thawed Pork vol.39, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e19