Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Foot-and-mouth Disease Vaccination Location and Injection Device on the Incidence of Site Lesions in Pork

  • Ko, Eun Young (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Samooel (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Hyun Kyu (Dodram Pig Farmers' Cooperative) ;
  • Han, Jeong Hee (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Son, Jung Ho (Noah Biotech Inc.)
  • Received : 2018.04.03
  • Accepted : 2018.04.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of the type O foot-and-mouse disease vaccine (FMDV) on the incidence of abnormal meat such as granuloma or abscess formation at the injection site in pork and its associated economic losses. At 56 d of age, piglets were inoculated with FMDV by one of three administration routes: N-Neck (a conventional needle-syringe injection into the neck), N-Ham (a conventional needle-syringe injection into the ham), and Non-Neck (injection with a needle-free device into the neck). The injection sites were visually examined for the presence of a granuloma or abscess, and the incidence rate of abnormal meat was calculated. The gross weight of the portion of the pork carcasses condemned because of granuloma or abscess formation was measured and multiplied by the weekly sales price to calculate the total economic losses. After implementation of FMDV, the economic losses were approximately six times higher than before implementation. Granuloma or abscess formation was significantly higher in the N-Neck and Non-Neck groups, in which the vaccine was inoculated into the neck area, than in the N-Ham group (N-Neck and N-Ham vs Non-Neck, p<0.05). These results suggest that the incidence of lesions could be reduced if the ham route was used for vaccination.

Keywords

References

  1. Batista-Duharte A, Portuondo D, Carlos IZ, Perez O. 2013. An approach to local immunotoxicity induced by adjuvanted vaccines. Int Immunopharmacol 17:526-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.07.025
  2. Chong H, Brady K, Metze D, Calonje E. 2006. Persistent nodules at injection sites (aluminum granuloma): Clinicopathological study of 14 cases with a diverse range of histological reaction patterns. Histopathology 48:182-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02312.x
  3. Gerlach BM, Houser TA, Hollis LC, Tokach MD, Nietfeld JC, Higgins JJ, Anderson GA, Goehring BL. 2012. Incidence and severity of Arcanobacterium pyogenes injection site abscesses with needle or needle-free injection. Meat Sci 92:805-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.07.004
  4. Houser T, Sebranek JG, Thacker BJ, Baas TJ, Nilubol D, Thacker EL, Kruse F. 2004. Effectiveness of transdermal, needlefree injections for reducing pork carcass defects. Meat Sci 68:329-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.016
  5. Kim DH, Chung CH, Lee DK, Jeong PS, Roh MK, Lee SY. 2012. The injection site lesions after using FMD vaccination. 22nd. Int Pig Vet Society Cong (abstract).
  6. King D, Painter T, Holtkamp D, DuBois P, Wang C. 2010. Effect of injection tool on incidence of head and neck abscesses at slaughter. J Swine Health Prod 18:290-293.
  7. McKercher PD, Gailiunas P, Burrows R, Capstick PB. 1971. Reactions of swine to oil-adjuvanted inactivated foot-and mouth disease virus vaccine inoculated by intramuscular and subcutaneous routes. Archiv fur die gesamte Virusforschung 35:364-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241917
  8. OIE. 2017. Terrestrial manual Paris. Chapter 2.1.8. Foot and mouth disease.
  9. Parida S. 2009. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus: Strategies and effectiveness. Expert RevVaccines 8:347-365. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.8.3.347
  10. Parker R, Deville S, Dupuis L, Bertrand F, Aucouterier J. 2009. Adjuvant formulation for veterinary vaccines: MontanideTM Gel safety profile. Procedia Vaccinol 1:140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.provac.2009.07.026
  11. SAS. 2009. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  12. Van den Broeke A, Leen F, Aluwe M, Ampe B, Van Meensel J, Millet S. 2016. The effect of GnRH vaccination on performance, carcass, and meat quality and hormonal regulation in boars, barrows, and gilts. J Anim Sci 94:2811-2820. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0173
  13. Vatulini S, Macchi C, Ballanti P, Cherel Y, Laval A, Theaker JM, Bak M, Ferretti E, Morvan H. 2005. Aluminum hydroxideinduced granulomas in pigs. Vaccine 23:3999-4004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.06.058

Cited by

  1. Reduction in Lesion Incidence in Pork Carcass Using Transdermal Needle-free Injection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine vol.38, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e46
  2. Reducing lesion incidence in pork carcasses by heating foot-and-mouth disease vaccine before injection vol.33, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0237