Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (기술혁신학회지)

Korea Technology Innovation Society (한국기술혁신학회)
권호 표지

The Effects of Input Additionality and Behavioural Additionality on the Output Additionality

투입부가성과 행동부가성이 산출부가성에 미치는 영향 : 연구개발특구 입주기업의 정부R&D보조금 조절효과를 중심으로

  • 곽민수 (한국기술교육대학교/한국광기술원) ;
  • 김병근 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부)
  • Received : 2018.07.14
  • Accepted : 2018.09.05
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the effects of Government R&D subsidies. We analyse the effects of inputs and behavioral additionality on the output additionality. We also measure the moderate effects of the experiences of benefiting from government R&D on the relationship between inputs and behavioral additionality and the output additionality. We conducted a structured questionnaire on the companies who have participated in promotion program of the Korea Innovation Cluster. 126 responses were collected and alnalysed using the OLS technique. Empirical results show that the relationship between input/behavioral additionality (management, follow-up, cognitive capacity) and output additionality had positive effect. The moderating effects of experiences of R&D subsidy on the relationship between input additionality and output additionality and the relationship between cognitive additionality and the output additionality appear to be statistically significant.

본 연구는 정부 R&D보조금의 정책적 효과를 규명하기 위해 투입, 관리, 후속, 인지부가성이 산출부가성에 미치는 영향을 규명한다. 또한 투입, 관리, 후속, 인지부가성과 산출부가성의 관계에 대해 정부 R&D보조금 수혜 경험의 조절효과를 분석한다. 실증분석을 위해 연구개발특구 입주기업 중 연구개발특구육성사업에 참여한 경험이 있는 기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 시행하여 수집한 126개 기업의 응답 자료를 분석하였다. 분석결과 투입, 관리, 후속, 인지부가성과 산출부가성의 관계는 모두 긍정적 효과가 있는 것으로 확인되었고, R&D보조금 수혜경험의 조절효과에서는 투입효과성(R&D보조금 ${\times}$ 투입부가성)과 인지효과성(R&D보조금 ${\times}$ 인지부가성)에서 긍정적인 조절효과를 확인하였다. 추가적으로, 종업수가 많을수록, 업력이 낮을수록, NT와 ST산업에서, 첨단기술기업일수록 산출부가성에 긍정적인 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 그 동안 국내에서 진행되지 않았던 미시적 관점의 행동부가성에 대한 실증을 실시하여 국내 혁신클러스터 단위에서 투입 행동부가성과 산출부가성관의 관계, R&D보조금 수혜경험의 조절효과를 새롭게 규명하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가과학기술위원회 (2012), 2012년도 국가연구개발사업 상위평가보고서, 서울 : 국가과학기술위원회.
  2. 권석균 (1995), "조직학습의 이론적 조망", 인사.조직연구, 3(1): 121-164.
  3. 강석민 (2013), "국내중소기업의 R&D 노력이 혁신에 미치는 영향 : 정부정책지원의 조절효과를 중심으로", 경영과 정보연구, 32(1): 1-18.
  4. 과학기술부 (2008), 과학기술 행정 40년사, 경기도 : 과학기술부.
  5. 김기완 (2008), 정부 R&D 보조금의 기업성과에 대한 효과분석, 정책연구시리즈 2008-07, 서울 : 한국개발연구원.
  6. 김동준.이종하.김동립 (2014), "정부보조금이 기업의 연구개발투자에 미치는 영향 : 지역산업 지원사업 수혜기업을 중심으로", 재정정책논집, 16(4): 77-101.
  7. 김민정 (2013), "정부 재정지원이 기업의 협력네트워크 구성과 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 분석", 국가정책연구, 27(2): 55-74.
  8. 김윤선.김병근 (2009), "정부 기술지원사업의 성과 영향요인에 관한 실증 연구 : 광(光)산업 기술력향상사업의 사례를 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 특별호: 267-293.
  9. 김호.김병근 (2012), "정부보조금의 민간 R&D 투자에 대한 관계 : 계량경제학적 문헌에 대한 메타회귀분석", 기술혁신연구, 19(3): 141-174.
  10. 김호.김병근 (2014), "정부의 기업연구개발지원의 부가성 효과에 관한 정성적 연구", 기술혁신연구, 22(4): 199-234. https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2014.22.4.199
  11. 미래창조과학부 (2017), 2018년도 정부연구개발투자방향 및 기준, 경기도 : 미래창조과학부.
  12. 미래창조과학부 (2016), 제3차 연구개발특구 육성종합계획(2016-2020), 경기도 : 미래창조과학부.
  13. 박오수.백윤정 (1997), "조직학습에 관한 이론적 고찰", 경영논집, 31(3-4): 93-130
  14. 박정수.허문구 (2015), "R&D협력이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 : 흡수능력의 조절효과", 인적자원관리연구, 22(2): 193-207.
  15. 서창적.이찬형 (2007), "정부의 연구개발지원제도가 중소기업 기술경영수준에 미치는 조절효과에 관한 연구", 한국생산성관리학회지, 18(3): 23-52.
  16. 성지은.박인용 (2013), 핀란드 R&D 성과관리의 특징과 시사점 : Tekes를 중심으로, Issue & Policy 2013, 제66호, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  17. 손수정 (2007), "혁신정책 평가시스템의 새로운 패러다임 모색 : 행동부가성 관점에서", 과학기술정책, 18(1): 18-31.
  18. 송기헌 (2007), "R&D기술개발 사업화 성공률 22.8%", 송기헌 국회의원 보도자료.
  19. 송종국.김혁준 (2009), "R&D 투자 촉진을 위한 재정지원정책의 효과분석", 기술혁신연구, 17(1): 1-48.
  20. 신진교.최영애 (2008), "중소기업의 R&D와 혁신 : 정부정책지원의 조절효과", 기업경영연구, 15(1): 119-132.
  21. 오준병.장원창 (2008), "정부 직접보조금, 기업 R&D 투자 그리고 대체 또는 보완효과의 결정요인 분석", 산업조직연구, 16(4): 1-33.
  22. 이공래 (2000), 기술혁신이론 개관, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  23. 이무원 (2015), "조직학습이론의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래", 인사조직연구, 23(4): 11-23.
  24. 이병헌.이수욱.위세안 (2014), "정부의 기술개발 지원이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 9(5): 157-171.
  25. 이우성.변인수.김보현.박종혜 (2009), R&D투자 HDP 대비 5%달성을 위한 민간R&D 투자촉진방안, 정책연구 2009-29, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  26. 정미애.김만진.이남희.조상혁 (2014), 기업 내.외부 연구개발과 성과와의 관계에 관한 연구, 조사연구 2014-12, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  27. 조가원 (2009), 연구개발 정부보조금과 기업의 혁신성과, 경기도 : 교육과학기술부.
  28. 조훈상.이철규 (2012), "로봇산업의 정부 R&D보조금 효과에 관한 연구 : 행동부가성을 중심으로", 대한경영학회지, 25(7): 3019-3039.
  29. 주홍신.김점수.박중구 (2011), "청정생산R&D 정부출연금의 기업 R&D투자에 대한 효과분석 : 민간기업R&D투자의 보완.대체효과를 중심으로", Clean Technology, 17(2): 181-1888. https://doi.org/10.7464/KSCT.2011.17.2.181
  30. 최대승 (2014), 기업에 대한 정부 R&D 투자지원의 정책효과 분석 연구, 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  31. 최석준.김상신 (2007), "정부 연구개발 보조금의 기업자체 R&D투자에 대한 효과 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 10(2): 706-726.
  32. 홍필기.서환주 (2011), "정부의 연구개발투자 보조금은 기업의 연구개발 투자를 촉진하는가?", 재정정책논집, 13(2): 85-111.
  33. 황남웅.이정민.김연배 (2014), "기술협력 활동이 기업의 제품혁신 성과에 미치는 영향 : 전유성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 22(1): 60-87.
  34. 황성수 (2011), "중소기업 R&D 정책자금 효과분석 : R&D지원기업과 미지원기업간의 R&D지원 효과성 실증분석", 중소기업금융연구, 59-85.
  35. 황용수.양창훈.조가원.손수정.임지선.김성진 (2011), 과학기술혁신정책의 증거기반 평가의 접근방법과 적용, 정책연구 2011-27, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  36. Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  37. Andersson, T. (1998), "Managing a Systems Approach to Technology and Innovation Policy", STI Review, 22: 9-29.
  38. Aschhoff, B., Fier, A. and Lohlein, H., (2006), "Detecting Behavioural Additionality: An Empirical Study on the Impact of Public R&D Funding on Firm's Cooperative Behaviour in Germany", ZEIW - Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper, 06-037.
  39. Bach, L. and Matt, M. (2002), "Rationale for Science and Technology Policy", in Georghiou, L., Rigby, J. and Cameron, H. (eds), Assessing the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Framework Programme, Report to DG Research.
  40. Bach, L., Conde-Molist, N., Ledoux, M. J., Matt, M. and Schaeffer, V. (1995), "Evaluation of the Economic Effects of Brite-Euram Programmes on the European Industry", Scientometrics, 34(3): 325-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018003
  41. Bakhshi, H., Edwards, J. S., Roper, S., Scully, J., Shaw, D., Morley, L. and Rathbone, N. (2013), "An Experimental Approach to Industrial Policy Evaluation: The Case of Creative Credits", Enterprise Research Centre, 4.
  42. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations", Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  43. Bergman, K ., E jermo, O., Fischer, J., Hallonsten, O., Hansen, H. K. and Moodysson, J. (2009), "Effects of VINNOVA Programmes on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: the Cases of Forska & Vax and VINN-NU", VINNOVA Analysis, VA, 2010: 09.
  44. Branstetter, L. and Sakakibara, M. (2002), "When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data", The American Economic Review, 92(1): 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015649
  45. Braein, L., Hervik, A., Nesset, E. and Rye, M. (2002), "The Norwegian Systematic Approach to Impact Estimation of R&D Subsidies: Focus on Additionality and the Contra-Factual Problem", IWT-Studies, 40: 67-85.
  46. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M. and Georghiou, L. (1995), "What Difference Does It Make? Additionality in the Public Support Of R&D in Large Firms", International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-6): 587-600.
  47. Busom, I. and Fernandez-Ribas, A. (2008), "The Impact of Firm Participation in R&D Programmes on R&D Partnerships", Research Policy, 37(2): 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.002
  48. Chudnovsky, D., Lopez, A., Rossi, M. and Ubfal, D. (2006), Evaluating a Program of Public Funding of Scientif ic Activity: A Case Study of FONCYT in Argentina, Working Paper: OVE/WP-12/06, Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
  49. Clarysse, B., Bilsen, V. and Steurs, G. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of the R&D Subsidies Programme of IWT-Flanders(Belgium)", in OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 91-114.
  50. Clarysse, B., Bilsen, V., Steurs, G. and Larosse, J. (2004), "Measuring Additionality of R&D Subsidies with Surveys: Towards an Evaluation Methodology for IWT-Flanders", Innovation Science Technology IWT-Observatory, 48: 23-56.
  51. Clarysse, B., Wright, M. and Mustar, P. (2009), "Behavioural Additionality of R&D Subsidies: A Learning Perspective", Research Policy, 38(10): 1517-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003
  52. Clausen, T. H. (2009), "Do Subsidies have Positive Impacts on R&D and Innovation Activities at the Firm Level?", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
  53. Consultrans (2005), Evaluacion del Programa de Fomento de la Investigacion Tecnica Profit(2000-2003) en el area de Tecnologias de Informacion y las Telecomunicaciones, Madrid: Consultrans.
  54. Cowling, M. (2010), Economic Evaluation of the Small Firms Loan Guarantee (SFLG) Scheme, Urn 10/512, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Institute for Employment Studies.
  55. Crepon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J. (1998), "Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7: 115-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031
  56. Czarnitzki, D. and Licht, G. (2006), "Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy. The Case of Eastern Germany", The Economics of Transition, 14(1): 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x
  57. Davenport, S., Grimes, C. and Davies, J. (1998), "Research Collaboration and Behavioral Additionality: A New Zealand Case Study", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524304
  58. David, P. A., Hall, B. H. and Toole, A. A. (2000), "Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence", Research Policy, 29: 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
  59. De Negri, J., Borges, M. and De Negri, F. (2006), The Impact of University Enterprise Incentive Program on the Performance and Technological Efforts of Brazilian Industrial Firms, Working Paper: OVE/WP-13/06, Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
  60. Dimos, C. and Pugh, G. (2016), "The Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies: A Meta-regression Analysis of the Evaluation Literature", Research Policy, 45: 797-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002
  61. DITR (Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia) (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of Business R&D Grant Programmes in Australia", In OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 39-57.
  62. DITR (Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia) (2007), How R&D Assistance Influences Company Behaviour: A Survey Investigating Behavioural Additionality Effects of the R&D Tax Concession Programme, Australia: Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
  63. Dodgson, M. (1993), "Organizational Learning: a Review of Some Literatures", Organization Studies, 14(3): 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
  64. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gok, A. and Shapira, P. (2012), Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  65. Falk, R. (2004), "Behavioural Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies: Empirical Evidence from Austria", Austrian Institute of Economic Research, 1: 1-16.
  66. Falk, R. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of Austria's Industrial Research Promotion Fund (FFF)", In OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 59-74.
  67. Falk, R. (2007), "Measuring the Effects of Public Support Schemes on Firms Innovation Activities", Research Policy, 36(5): 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.005
  68. Fiol, C. M. and Lyles, M. A. (1985), "Organizational Learning", Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 803-813. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279103
  69. Frazier, P. A., Tix A. P. and Barron K. E. (2004), "Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1): 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
  70. Garcia, J. and Afcha-Chavez, S. (2009), El Impacto del Apoyo Publico a la I+D Empresarial: Un Analisis Comparativo entre las Subvenciones Estatalesy Regionales, Journal of Regional Research, 15: 277-294.
  71. Garcia-Quevedo, J. (2004), "Do Public Subsidies Complement Business R&D? A Meta-Analysis of the Econometric Evidence", Kyklos, 57(1): 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00244.x
  72. Gelabert, L., Fosfuri, A. and Tribo, J. A. (2009), "Does the Effect of Public Support for R&D Depend on the Degree of Appropriability?", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4): 736-767 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00396.x
  73. Georghiou, L. and Clarysse, B. (2006), "Introduction and Synthesis", In OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 9-38.
  74. Georghiou, L. (2002), "Impact and Additionality of Innovation Policy", IWT-Studies, 40: 57-65.
  75. Georghiou, L. (2004), "Evaluation of Behavioural Additionality. Concept Paper", IWT-Studies, 48: 7-22.
  76. Gok, A. (2010), "An Evolutionary Approach to Innovation Policy Evaluation: Behavioural Additionality and Organisational Routines", PhD Thesis, The University of Manchester.
  77. Gok, A. and Edler, J. (2012), "The Use of Behavioural Additionality Evaluation in Innovation Policy Making", Research Evaluation, 21(4): 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs015
  78. Hakim, C. (2000), Research Design: Successful Designs for Social and Economic Research, 2nd Edition, Routledge: London.
  79. Hsu, F. M., Horng, D. J. and Hsueh, C. C. (2009), "The Effect of Government-sponsored R&D Programmes on Additionality in Recipient Firms in Taiwan", Technovation, 29: 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001
  80. Hyvarinen, J. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of Public R&D Funding in Finland", In OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 115-126.
  81. IWT(Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders) (2002), Innovation Policy and Sustainable Development: Can I Innovation Incentives Makes a Difference?, IWT-studies 40, Brussels, IWT-Observatory.
  82. IWT(Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders) (2004), 'Making the Difference', The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additioinality' of R&D Subsidies, IWT-studies 48, Brussels, IWT-Observatory.
  83. Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A. and Clarysse B. (2014), "The Impact of Technology Intermediaries on Firm Cognitive Capacity Additionality", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81: 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.007
  84. Kochhar, R. and David, P. (1996), "Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Competing Hypotheses", Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199601)17:1<73::AID-SMJ795>3.0.CO;2-N
  85. KOF (2004), Evaluation of the Austrian Industrial Research Promotion Fund (FFF) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), Joanneum Research, Technopolis, Universiteit Twente, WIFO, Synthesis Report, April 2004.
  86. Larosse, J. (2004), "Conceptual and Empirical Challenges of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Innovation Policies with 'Behavioural Additionality' (The Case of IWT R&D Subsidies)", IWT-studies, 48: 57-69.
  87. Madsen, E. and Brastad, B. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of Innovation Norway's Financial Support Programmes", in OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 181-203.
  88. Malik, K., Georghiou, L. and Cameron, H. (2006), in OECD (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of the UK SMART and LINK Schemes", in OECD (eds), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 205-218.
  89. Magro, E., Aranguren, M. and Navarro, M. (2010), "Does Regional S&T Policy Affect Firms' Behaviour", In Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference, 24-26.
  90. Mole, K. F., Roper, S., Hart, M., Storey, D. and Saal, D. (2006), Economic Impact Study of Business Link Local Service, in Department for Business Enterprise & Regulation Reform, URN 07/1169, UK.
  91. Myers, R. H. (1990), Classical and Modern Regression with Applications (Vol. 2), Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
  92. Meuleman, M. and Maeseneire, W. D. (2012), "Do R&D Subsidies Affect SMEs' Access to External Financing?", Research Policy, 41: 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.001
  93. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
  94. OECD (2006), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, France: OECD Publishing.
  95. OMB (2010), Small Firms Loan Guarantee (SFLG) Scheme Recipient and Comparison Group Survey Results, URN 10/511, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Institute for Employment Studies.
  96. Ozcelik, E. and Taymaz, E. (2008), "R&D Support Programmes in Developing Countries: The Turkish Experience", Research Policy, 37: 258-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.001
  97. Peng, H. and Liu, Y. (2018), "How Government Subsidies Promote the Growth of Entrepreneurial Companies in Clean Energy Industry: An Empirical Study in China", Journal of Cleaner Production, 188: 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.126
  98. Perez, C. R. (2016), "Designing a Behavioural Additionality Evaluation Methodology for the Knowledge Transfer Partnerships Scheme Employing Case-Based Methods and Theory-Based Evaluation Approaches", PhD Thesis, The University of Manchester.
  99. Polt, W. and Psarra, F. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of the EU's 5th Framework Programme", in OECD (eds.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 235-246.
  100. Polt, W. and Streicher, G. (2005), "Trying to Capture Additionality in Framework Programme 5-main findings", Science and Public Policy, 32(5): 367-373. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154305781779344
  101. Roper, S. and Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2016). "The Legacy of Public Subsidies for Innovation: Input, Output and Behavioural Additionality Effects", ERC (Enterprise Research Centre), 21.
  102. Rossi, P. and Freeman, H. E. (1985), Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (Third Edition), Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
  103. Rye, M. (2002), "Evaluating the Impact of Public Support on Commercial Research and Development Projects: Are Verbal Reports of Additionality Reliable?", Evaluation, 8(2): 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358902002008002515
  104. Schibany, A., Streicher, G., Gretzmacher, N., Falk, M., Falk, R., Knoll, N., Schwarz, G. and Worter, M. (2004), Evaluation FFF - Impact Analysis: Background Report 3.2, Institute of Technology and Regional Policy, InTeReg Research Report Series 22.
  105. Shin, T. (2006), Behavioural Additionality of Public R&D Funding in Korea, Chapter 9 in OECD, Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour Measuring Behavioural Additionality, France: OECD.
  106. Shipp, S., Wisniewski, L., Wang, A. and Campbell, S. (2006), "Behavioural Additionality of the US Advanced Technology Programme", in OECD (eds), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, Paris: OECD Publishing, 219-233
  107. Shrivastava, P. (1983), "A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems", Journal of Management Studies, 20(1): 7-28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00195.x
  108. Simachev, Y., Kuzyk, M. and Zudin, N. (2017), "Assessing the Impact of Public Funding and Tax Incentives in Russia: Recipient Analysis and Additionality Effects Evaluation", Fteval Journal, 44: 17-34.
  109. Spithoven, A., Knockaert, M. and Vereertbrugghen, C. (2009), Collective Research Centres: A Study on R&D and Technology Transfer Involvement, R&D and Innovation in Belgium Research Series 11, Belgian: Belgian Science Policy.
  110. Wanzenbock, I., Scherngell, T. and Fischer, M. M. (2013), "How do Firm Characteristics Affect Behavioural Additionalities of Public R&D Subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian Transport Eector", Technovation, 33(2-3): 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.006
  111. Yelle, L. E. (1979), "The Learning Curve: Historical Review and Comprehensive Survey", Decision Sciences, 10: 302-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00026.x