DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maximum number of total born piglets in a parity and individual ranges in litter size expressed as specific characteristics of sows

  • Freyer, Gertraude (Leibniz Institute of Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute for Genetics and Biometry)
  • Received : 2017.07.25
  • Accepted : 2018.05.01
  • Published : 2018.05.31

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to underline that litter size as a key trait of sows needs new parameters to be evaluated and to target an individual optimum. Large individual variation in litter size affects both production and piglet's survival and health negatively. Therefore, two new traits were suggested and analyzed. Two data sets on 5509 purebred German Landrace sows and 3926 Large White and crossing sows including at least two parental generations and at least five parities were subjected to variance components analysis. Results: The new traits for evaluating litter size were derived from the individual numbers of total born piglets (TBP) per parity: In most cases, sows reach their maximum litter size in their fourth parity. Therefore, data from at least five parities were included. The first observable maximum and minimum of TBP, and the individual variation expressed by the range were targeted. Maximum of TBP being an observable trait in pig breeding and management yielded clearly higher heritability estimates ($h^2{\sim}0.3$) than those estimates predominantly reported so far. Maximum TBP gets closer to the genetic capacity for litter size than other litter traits. Minimum of TBP is positively correlated with the range of TBP ($r_p=0.48$, $r_g$ > 0.6). The correlation between maximum of TBP and its individually reached frequency was negative in both data sets ($r_p=-0.28$ and - 0.22, respectively). Estimated heritability coefficients for the range of TBP comprised a span of $h^2=0.06$ to 0.10. Conclusion: An optimum both for maximum and range of total born piglets in selecting sows is a way contributing to homogenous litters in order to improving the animal-related conditions both for piglets' welfare and economic management in pig.

Keywords

References

  1. Lawlor PG, Lynch PB. A review of factors influencing litter size in Irish sows. Irish Veterinary J. 2007;60:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-60-6-359
  2. Nguyen K, Cassar G, Friendship RM, Dewey C, Farzan A, Kirkwood RN. An investigation of induced parturition, birth weight, birth order, litter size, and sow parity on piglet serum concentrations of immunoglobulin G. J Swine Health Prod. 2013;21(3):139-43.
  3. Tribout T, Caritez JC, Gogue J, Gruand J, Billon Y, Dividich JLE, Quesnel H, Bidanel JP. Estimation of realized genetic trend in French large white pigs from 1977 to 1998 using frozen semen. J de la Rech Porcine en France. 2003;35:85-292.
  4. Barbosa L, Lopes PS, Regazzi AJ, Torres RD, Santana JR, Veroneze R. Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in pigs using multi-trait analyses. Revista Brasileira Zootecnia. 2008;37:1947-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001100007
  5. Freyer G, Mayer M. Analysis of selected fecundity traits in two German pig breeds Landrasse and Edelschwein and their crossings. Zuchtungskunde. 2012;84:500-10.
  6. Kovac M, Groeneveld E, Garcia-Cortez A. VCE 5.1.2. Computer Programme, FAL Neustadt/Mariensee. Germany. 2003.
  7. Groeneveld E. PEST User's manual. FAL Neustadt/Mariensee, 1998.
  8. Szulc K, Knecht D, Jankowska-Makosa A, Skrzypczak E, Nowaczewski S. The influence of fattening and slaughter traits on reproduction in polish large white sows. Italian J Anim Sci. 2013;12:e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e3
  9. Sell-Kubiak E, Duijvesteijn N, Lopes MS, Janss LLG, Knol EF, Bijma P, Mulder HA. Genome-wide association study reveals novel loci for litter size and its variability in a large white pig population. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1049)
  10. Argente MJ. Major Components in Limiting Litter Size, Insights from Animal Reproduction, Rita Payan Carreira (Ed.), InTech. 2016; https://doi.org/10.5772/62280.
  11. Distl O. Mechanisms of regulation of litter size in pigs on the genome level. Reprod Domestic Animal. 2007;42:10-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00887.x
  12. Munoz M, Fernandez AI, Olivo C, Munoz G, Rodriguez C, Fernandez A, Alves E, Silio L. Non-additive effects of RBP4, ESR1 and IGF2 polymorphisms on litter size at different parities in a Chinese-European porcine line. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-23
  13. Dall'Olio S, Fontanesi L, Tognazzi L, Buttazzoni L, Gallo M, Russo V. ESR1 and ESR2 gene markers are not associated with number of piglets born alive in Italian large white sows. Italian J Anim Sci. 2011; https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2011.e35.

Cited by

  1. Selecting for changes in average “parity curve” pattern of litter size in Large White pigs vol.136, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12372
  2. The Use of Vagina-Cervix Length Measurement in Evaluation of Future Reproductive Performance of Sows: A Preliminary Study under Commercial Conditions vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040158
  3. Estimation of litter size variability phenotypes in Large White sows vol.137, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12465
  4. Selection for litter size and litter birthweight in Large White pigs: Maximum, mean and variability of reproduction traits vol.15, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100352