DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multicultural education shown in elementary school mathematics textbook based on 2015 revised curriculum

2015 개정 교육과정을 반영한 초등학교 1, 2학년 수학교과서에 나타난 다문화 교육

  • Received : 2017.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.01.20
  • Published : 2018.01.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the multicultural mathematics education factor shown in mathematics textbook. For this purpose, 2015 revised curriculum, mathematics textbook and teacher's guide book of first and second grade were analyzed using framework for multicultural mathematics education factor. The results of this study revealed that the general guideline of the national curriculum included 'culture identity', 'diversity of knowledge' and 'social problem solving' but the curriculum of mathematics excluded 'culture identity'. Nevertheless, mathematics textbook showed various multicultural mathematics education factor except 'social problem solving'. But there are several kinds of problem. Fist, application level of multicultural mathematics education factor was mostly low. Second, history of mathematics and culture aspects were Europocentric. Thirds, characters in mathematics text book were excessively standard. there weren't other ethnicity, the disabled, multicultural students. On the basis of these results, this paper includes several implications for the future multicultural mathematics education in elementary school.

본 연구는 1, 2학년 수학교과서에 반영된 다문화 교육요소를 분석하기 위해 다문화 수학교육 요소 분석 틀을 개발하여 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정과 이를 바탕으로 한 교과서와 교사용 지도서를 분석하였다. 교육과정 총론에서는 '우리 문화의 정체성'이나 '지식의 다양성', '사회적 문제 해결'에 대한 다문화 교육 요소가 비교적 명확하게 드러나 있었지만, 수학과 교육과정에서는 '우리 문화의 정체성'이 나타나지 않았다. 그럼에도 불구하고 수학교과서에는 '사회적 문제해결'을 제외한 다문화 교육요소가 고루 나타나 있었다. 그러나 교과서에 적용된 다문화 교육 요소의 적용 수준은 대부분 낮게 나타났으며 교과서에 제시된 다른 나라의 수학사나 문화가 지나치게 유럽 중심이라는 문제점이 있었다. 또한 교과서에는 다문화 학생이나 장애인, 타인종은 찾아볼 수 없었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 수학 교과에서 다문화 교육이 활성화 될 수 있도록 다음 교과서를 제작하는데 있어서 시사점을 제공하고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2015). 초 ․ 중등학교 교육과정 총론. 교육부고시 제2015-80호 [별책1].(Ministry of Education (2015). the general guideline of the national curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-80[supplement 1].)
  2. 교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74 [별책8].(Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74[supplement 8].)
  3. 교육부 (2017). 수학 1-1, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics 1-1, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  4. 교육부 (2017). 수학 1-2, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics 1-2, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  5. 교육부 (2017). 수학 2-1, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics 2-1, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  6. 교육부 (2017). 수학 2-2, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics 2-1, Seoul:Chunjae Education,INC.)
  7. 교육부 (2017). 수학 교사용 지도서 1-1, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics guidebook for teacher 1-1, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  8. 교육부 (2017). 수학 교사용 지도서 1-2, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics guidebook for teacher 1-2,, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  9. 교육부 (2017). 수학 교사용 지도서 2-1, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics guidebook for teacher 2-1,, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  10. 교육부 (2017). 수학 교사용 지도서 2-2, 서울: 천재교육(주)(Ministry of Education (2017). mathematics guidebook for teacher 2-2,, Seoul: Chunjae Education,INC.)
  11. 김무정 (2011). 초등학교 통합 교과서의 다문화 교육내용 분석 : 2009 개정 교육과정을 중심으로. 한국초등도덕교육학회, 36, 335-350.(Kim, M. J. (2011). Analysis of Content Elementary Integration Textbook in terms of Multicultural Education: with 2009 revised curriculum as the central figure. Korean Elementary Moral Education Society, 36, 335-350.)
  12. 김혜미 (2013). 수학 교과서의 다문화적 요소 비교 연구 : 2007, 2009 개정 중학교 1학년 교과서를 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.(Kim, H. M. (2013). Comparative Study of Multiculural Content Elements in the $7^{th}$ Grade Math Textbook. Master dissertation, Ewha Womans UniversityGraduate School of Education, Soeul.)
  13. 오성배.김성식 (2016). 다문화 학생의 학력부진 실태와 영향 요인 탐색. 한국교육사회학회 학술대회 자료집, 62, 79-97.(Oh, S. B. & Kim, S. S. (2016). Exploration of Real Condition of Low Achievement and Influence Factor.The Korean Society for Sociology of Education Conference Sourcebook, 62, 79-97)
  14. 윤미정.김경식 (2013). 2009 개정 교육과정 교과서의 다문화 교육적 요소 분석 : 초등학교 1, 2학년 교과서를 중심으로. 한국교육사회학회 학술대회 자료집, 54, 141-168.(Yoon, M. J. & Kim, K. S. (2013). Analysis of Multiculural Education factor : Centered in First and Second Grade of Elementary School. The Korean Society for Sociology of Education Sourcebook, 54, 141-168.)
  15. 이화진.오상철.김태은.김영빈(2011). 학력향상형 창의 경영학교 운영 성과 분석 및 기초학력 미달 학생지도.지원 체제. 한국교육과정평가원.(Lee, H. J., Oh, S. C. & Kim, Y. B. (2011). PerformanceAnalysis of Creative School for Learning Improvement and Support System for Students of Underachievementto Basic Level. KICE.)
  16. 장사형 (2017). 다문화사회 및 다문화교육에 대한 논의와 그 적용의 적절성 고찰. 교육철학, 62, 99-126(Jang, S. H. (2017). A Critical I vestigation on Relevance of Discussion and Its Application about Multi-culturalSociety and Multi-cultural Education. Philosophy of Education, 62, 99-126.)
  17. 장윤영, 고상숙 (2009). 다문화권 학생들의 초등수학학습과정에 관한 사례연구. 수학교육, 48(4), 419-442.(Jang, Y. Y. & Go, S. S. (2009). A Case Study on the Instructional Dimensions in Teaching Mathematics to the Elementary School Students from Multi-cultural Backgrounds. The Mathematical Education, 48(4), 419-442.)
  18. 한국교육개발원 (2016). 교육통계분석자료집. 유.초.중등 교육통계편.(KEDI (2016). Information Package of Educational Statistics. Educational Statistics Part of Preschool.Elementary School.Secondary School.)
  19. KEDI (2016). Information Package of Educational Statistics. Educational Statistics Part of Preschool. Elementary School. Secondary School.
  20. Ascher, M. (1991). Ethnomathematics : A multicultural view of mathematical ideas. NY: Chapman & Hall.
  21. Banks,
J. (2008). Introduction to multicultural education (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  22. Bennett, C. I. (2007). Comprehensive multicultural education (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  23. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  24. D'Ambrosio, U. (1997). Ethnomathematics and its place in history and pedagogy of mathematics. In Powell, A. B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 13-24). NY: SUNY Press.
  25. Gibson, M. A. (1976). Approaches to multicultural education in the United States. Anthropology &Education Quarterly, 7(4), 7-18.
  26. Gollnick, D. M., & Chinn, P. C. (2006). Multicultural education in a plural society (7th Ed.). NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  27. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
  28. Leonard, J. (2008). Culturally secific pedagogy in the mathematics classroom. NY: Routledge.
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The author.
  30. Nieto, S. & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming Diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education,Inc.
  31. Nelson, D., Joseph, G. G., & Williams, J. (1993). Multicultural mathematics: Teaching mathematics from a global perspective. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  32. Sleeter, C. E. (1997). Mathematics, multicultural education, and professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 680-696. https://doi.org/10.2307/749637