Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application of QFD Application Model for Target Performance and Cost Setting of The Weapon System

무기체계 목표성능과 목표비용 설정을 위한 품질기능전개(QFD) 응용모델 연구

  • Lee, Tae Hwa (Development team, Ptolemy System Corp.) ;
  • Hong, Sung Hoon (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuck Moo (Division of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Min Koo (Department of Information and Statistics, Chungnam National University)
  • 이태화 ((주)톨레미) ;
  • 홍성훈 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 권혁무 (부경대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 이민구 (충남대학교 정보통계학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.19
  • Accepted : 2018.11.14
  • Published : 2018.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To derive key requirements and key technologies for weapon system acquisition business by using Qualify Function Deployment (QFD), and to reduce business cost by setting the target performance and key expense of weapon system. Methods: We propose a QFD methodology that can induce rational decision-making by translating analyst's subjective opinions into quantitative values when analyzing requirements at the initial stage of weapon system development project. Based on QFD methodology, QFD application model combining house of quality, value engineering, and analogy cost estimating technique is presented. Results: It was possible to analyze the specific requirements necessary for the development of the weapon system, to solve the communication problem of the participants, to set clear development direction and target. Conclusion: By applying the QFD application model at the early stage of the weapon system acquisition project, it is possible to reduce the business cost by establishing clear development direction and goal through the procedural analysis process.

Keywords

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Configuration of the proposed QFD application model

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. HOQ of QFD Model

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 4. Configuration of HOQ (Functional Performance Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 6. Configuration of HOQ(Improvement Estimation Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 7. Configuration of HOQ(Alternative Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 8. Example(HOQ of Functional Performance Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 9. Example(HOQ of Component Performance Analysis & Cost Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0008.png 이미지

Figure 10. Example(Improvement Estimation Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0009.png 이미지

Figure 11. Example(Alternative Analysis)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0010.png 이미지

Figure 3. HOQ of the proposed QFD

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_f0011.png 이미지

Figure 5. Configuration of HOQ (Component Performance Analysis)

Table 1. Decision of Requirements & KPPs

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of interim target performance and target cost settings

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Results of final target performance and target cost settings

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_821_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Kim, K. J. 1995. "Improved quality in the design phase via QFD." ie Magazine. 2(1):16-21.
  2. Kim, J. R., and Kim, D. H. 1999. "Application of QFD and Taguchi method for product design." Chosun University Production technology research. 21(1):103-121.
  3. Woo, T. H., and Park, J. H. 2002. "A Model of Quality Function Deployment with Cost-Quality Trade offs." Korea Safety Management & Science Conference. 4(2):169-178.
  4. Kim, D. H., Lee, M. S., and Kim, K. J. 2004. "A Systematic Method for Generating EC Candidates in QFD." The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Spring Conference. 2004(2):483-486.
  5. Min, D. K., and Kim, K. J. 2004. "Variability Analysis in QFD : Prioritizing Engineering Characteristics." Korea Safety Management & Science, Spring Conference. 2004(S):466-469.
  6. Kim, D. H., Kim, K. J., and Min, D. K. 2005. "Considertaion of Uncertainty in Input Information of QFD." Korea Safety Management & Science/Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Spring Conference. 2005(5):543-550.
  7. Lee, H. S., Yoo, C. B., Lee, M. Ju., and Choi, Y. J. 2005. "A Study on the Method of Implementing QFD Considering Cost." Institute of Industrial Technology, A collection of essays. 30:47-55.
  8. Kim, K. J., and Min, D. K. 2007. "An extended QFD planning model for goal attainment considering longitudinal effect." Korea Safety Management & Science/Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Spring Conference. 2007(5):834-838.
  9. Choi, Y. J., Lee, P. J., and Han, W. Chul. 2007. "A Study on Method for Realization of Cost-based Quality Function Deployment(QFCD)." korean society of computer and information, A collection of essays. 12(4):221-228.
  10. Lee, T. H. 2013. "On the Risk Mitigation with Requirements Analysis based on the QFD Method." Ajou University, Department of Systems Engineering. 1-121.
  11. Won, J. H., Han, B. Y., and Kim, S. H. 2011. "A Study on Effective Model of Estimation of Acquisition Costs Based on Analogy Method." Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies 18(2):262-281.
  12. Kim, J. H. 2013. "A Study on the Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Survivability Design Optimization of Light Armed Helicopter." The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Science, Autumn Conference. 2013(11):861-865.
  13. Lee, H. S., Ha, K. Y., and Kwak, S. W. 2009. "Theory and practice of cost analysis." Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.