DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic response variation of multistory base-isolated buildings applying lead rubber bearings

  • Islam, A.B.M. Saiful (Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Al-Kutti, Walid A. (Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University)
  • Received : 2017.04.13
  • Accepted : 2018.01.24
  • Published : 2018.05.25

Abstract

The possibility of earthquakes in vulnerable regions indicates that efficient technique is required for seismic protection of buildings. During the recent decades, the concept is moving towards the insertion of base isolation on seismic prone buildings. So, investigation of structural behavior is a burning topic for buildings to be isolated in base level by bearing device. This study deals with the incorporation of base isolation system and focuses the changes of structural responses for different types of Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) isolators. A number of sixteen model buildings have been simulated selecting twelve types of bearing systems as well as conventional fixed-base (FB) scheme. The superstructures of the high-rise buildings are represented by finite element assemblage adopting multi-degree of freedoms. Static and dynamic analyses are carried out for FB and base isolated (BI) buildings. The dynamic analysis in finite element package has been performed by the nonlinear time history analysis (THA) based on the site-specific seismic excitation and compared employing eminent earthquakes. The influence of the model type and the alteration in superstructure behavior of the isolated buildings have been duly assessed. The results of the 3D multistory structures show that the lateral forces, displacement, inertia and story accelerations of the superstructure of the seismic prone buildings are significantly reduced due to bearing insertion. The nonlinear dynamic analysis shows 12 to 40% lessening in base shear when LRB is incorporated leading to substantial allowance of horizontal displacement. It is revealed that the LRB isolators might be potential options to diminish the respective floor accelerations, inertia, displacements and base shear whatever the condition coincides. The isolators with lower force intercept but higher isolation period is found to be better for decreasing base shear, floor acceleration and inertia force leading to reduction of structural and non-structural damage. However, LRB with lower isolator period seems to be more effective in dropping displacement at bearing interface aimed at reducing horizontal shift of building structure.

Keywords

References

  1. Ates, S. (2012), "Investigation of effectiveness of double concave friction pendulum bearings", Comput. Concrete, 9(3), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2012.9.3.195
  2. Ates, S. and Yurdakul, M. (2011), "Site-response effects on RC buildings isolated by triple concave friction pendulum bearings", Comput. Concrete, 8(6), 693-715. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2011.8.6.693
  3. Avossa, A.M. and Pianese, G. (2017), "Damping effects on the seismic response of base-isolated structures with lrb devices", Ingegneria Sismica, 34(2), 3-30.
  4. Casciati, F. and Hamdaoui, K. (2008), "Modelling the uncertainty in the response of a base isolator", Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(4), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.014
  5. Chen, Z.Y., Zhao, H. and Lou, M.L. (2016), "Seismic performance and optimal design of framed underground structures with leadrubber bearings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(2), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.2.259
  6. Computer & Structures Inc. (CSI) (2004), SAP 2000, Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis of Three-Dimensional Structures, Berkeley, CA.
  7. Deb, S. (2004), "Seismic base isolation-an overview", Curr. Sci., 87(10), 1426-1430.
  8. Dicleli, M. and Buddaram, S. (2007), "Comprehensive evaluation of equivalent linear analysis method for seismic-isolated structures represented by sdof systems", Eng. Struct., 29(8), 1653-1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.013
  9. Faal, H.N. and Poursha, M. (2017), "Applicability of the N2, extended N2 and modal pushover analysis methods for the seismic evaluation of base-isolated building frames with lead rubber bearings (LRBs)", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 98, 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.036
  10. Fan, J., Long, X.H. and Zhang, Y.P. (2015), "Optimum design of lead-rubber bearing system with uncertainty parameters", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(6), 959-982. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.6.959
  11. Ganji, M. and Kazem, H. (2017), "Comparing seismic performance of steel structures equipped with viscous dampers and lead rubber bearing base isolation under near-field earthquake", Civil Eng. J. Tehran, 3(2), 124-136.
  12. Gharehbaghi, S., Moustafa, A. and Salajegheh, E. (2016), "Optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete frame structures", Comput. Concrete, 17(6), 761-786. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.6.761
  13. Hosen, M.A., Jumaat, M.Z., Islam, A.B.M.S., Kamruzzaman, M., Huda, M.N. and Soeb, M.R. (2015), "Eliminating concrete cover separation of NSM strengthened beam by CFRP end anchorage", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(6), 899-916. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.6.899
  14. Hu, K., Zhou, Y., Jiang, L., Chen, P. and Qu, G. (2017), "A mechanical tension-resistant device for lead rubber bearings", Eng. Struct., 152, 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.006
  15. Islam, A.B.M.S., Jameel, M., Rahman, M.A. and Jumaat, M.Z. (2011), "Earthquake time history for Dhaka, Bangladesh as competent seismic record", Int. J. Phys. Sci., 6(16), 3921-3926.
  16. Islam, A.B.M.S., Hussain, R.R., Jameel, M. and Jumaat, M.Z. (2012a), "Non-linear time domain analysis of base isolated multi-storey building under site specific bi-directional seismic loading", Auto. Constr., 22, 554-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.017
  17. Islam, A.B.M.S., Hussain, R.R., Jumaat, M.Z. and Darain, K.M. (2014), "Implication of rubber-steel bearing nonlinear models on soft storey structures", Comput. Concrete, 13(5), 603-619. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.13.5.603
  18. Islam, A.B.M.S., Hussain, R.R., Jumaat, M.Z. and Rahman, M.A. (2013a), "Nonlinear dynamically automated excursions for rubber-steel bearing isolation in multi-storey construction", Auto. Constr., 30(0), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.010
  19. Islam, A.B.M.S., Jameel, M., Jumaat, M.Z. and Rahman, M.M. (2013b), "Optimization in structural altitude for seismic base isolation at medium risk earthquake disaster region", Disast. Adv., 6(1), 23-34.
  20. Islam, A.B.M.S., Jameel, M., Uddin, M.A. and Jumaat, M.Z. (2012b), "Competent building elevation for incorporating base isolation in aseismic structure", Procedia Eng., 50, 882-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1877-7058(14)00002-2
  21. Islam, A.B.M.S., Jumaat, M.Z., Hussain, R.R., Hosen, M.A. and Huda, M.N. (2015), "Incorporation preference for rubber-steel bearing isolation in retrofitting existing multi storied building", Comput. Concrete, 16(4), 503-529. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.4.503
  22. Ismail, M., Rodellar, J. and Ikhouane, F. (2010), "An innovative isolation device for aseismic design", Eng. Struct., 32(4), 1168-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.043
  23. Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Optimum lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions", Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2503-2513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.010
  24. Kelly, T.E. (2001), Base Isolation of Structures: Design Guidelines, Holmes Consulting Group Ltd.
  25. Kelly, T.E., Robinson, W.H. and Skinner, R.I. (2006), Seismic Isolation for Designers and Structural Engineers: Robinson seismic Ltd.
  26. Kilar, V. and Koren, D. (2009), "Seismic behaviour of asymmetric base isolated structures with various distributions of isolators", Eng. Struct., 31(4), 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.12.006
  27. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2004), "Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures", Eng. Struct., 26(12), 1735-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.011
  28. Micheli, I., Cardini, S., Colaiuda, A. and Turroni, P. (2004), "Investigation upon the dynamic structural response of a nuclear plant on aseismic isolating devices", Nucl. Eng. Des., 228(1-3), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.06.028
  29. Oncu, M.E. and Yon, M.S. (2016), "Assessment of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses for RC structures", Comput. Concrete, 18(6), 1195-1211. https://doi.org/10.12989/CAC.2016.18.6.1195
  30. Ounis H.M. and Ounis, A. (2013), "Parameters influencing the response of a base-isolated building", Slovak J. Civil Eng., 21(3), 31-42.
  31. Ozdemir, G. and Gulkan, H.P. (2016), "Scaling legitimacy for design of lead rubber bearing isolated structures using a bounding analysis", Earthq. Spectra, 32(1), 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1193/123113EQS300M
  32. Pocanschi, A. and Phocas, M.C. (2007), "Earthquake isolator with progressive nonlinear deformability", Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2586-2592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.016
  33. Providakis, C. (2008), "Effect of LRB isolators and supplemental viscous dampers on seismic isolated buildings under near-fault excitations", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1187-1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.020
  34. Rahman, M.M., Jumaat, M.Z. and Islam, A.B.M.S. (2017), "Weight minimum design of concrete beam strengthened with glass fiber reinforced polymer bar using genetic algorithm", Comput. Concrete, 19(2), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.2.127
  35. Ras, A. and Boumechra, N. (2017), "Dissipation's capacity study of lead-rubber bearing system in seismic steel structures design", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 42(9), 3863-3874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2489-z
  36. Saha, S.K., Matsagar, V.A. and Jain, A.K. (2015), "Reviewing dynamic analysis of base-isolated cylindrical liquid storage tanks under near-fault earthquakes", IES J. Part A: Civil Struct. Eng., 8(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2014.979518
  37. Sayin, E. and Calayir, Y. (2015), "Comparison of linear and nonlinear earthquake response of masonry walls", Comput. Concrete, 16(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.1.017
  38. Spyrakos, C.C., Koutromanos, I.A. and Maniatakis, C.A. (2009). Seismic response of base-isolated buildings including soilstructure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29(4), 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.07.002
  39. Uniform Building Code (UBC) (1997), "Earthquake regulations for seismic isolated structures", International Conference of Building Officials, Whitter, CA, USA.
  40. Wilkinson, S. and Hiley, R. (2006), "A non-linear response history model for the seismic analysis of high-rise framed buildings", Comput. Struct., 84(5-6), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.021
  41. Wu, Y.F., Wang, H., Li, A.Q., Feng, D.M., Sha, B. and Zhang, Y.P. (2017), "Explicit finite element analysis and experimental verification of a sliding lead rubber bearing", J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, 18(5), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1600302
  42. Zordan, T., Liu, T., Briseghella, B. and Zhang, Q. (2014), "Improved equivalent viscous damping model for base-isolated structures with lead rubber bearings", Eng. Struct., 75, 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.044