Korea and Global Affairs (한국과 국제사회)

Korea Institute of Politics and Society (한국정치사회연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Geopolitical Interpretation of China's Island Chain Strategy

중국의 도련선(島摙線) 전략에 대한 지정학적 해석

  • Received : 2018.01.31
  • Accepted : 2018.03.08
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper covers the issues including geopolitical effects of sea power on sea space in East Asia and its nature in a perspective of the past and the present. This paper analyzes the significance of Sea Power which is emphasized in Mahan's Theory of Insular Dominance and grasps the geopolitical nature of Sea Power. Along with this awareness, it deals with the problem of designated strategic phenomenon that is spreading to the Pacific Ocean with the concept of the Island Chain in China in the 21st century. Around the turn of 20th century, Japan materialized the policy of Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere which was planned to expand power sphere in sea space in the East Asia based on sea power and China took shape of the concept of Island Chain in the 21st century, which has divided sea space in East Asia. Under the circumstance that China's policy of island chain faced the resistance from countries in the East Asia as well as the USA, the question about whether Korea's policy of depending on sea power is valuable even in the 21st century has been raised.

본 논문은 해양력이 동아시아 해양공간에 미치는 지정학적 파장과 그 성격의 문제를 다룬다. 마한의 도서국가지배론에서 강조되고 있는 해양력이 갖는 의미를 분석하고, 해양력의 지정학적 성격을 파악한다. 이러한 인식과 함께, 21세기 현재 중국이 도련선 전략을 통해 태평양으로 진출하고 있는 지정전략적 성격과 그 파장의 문제를 조사한다. 지난 20세기를 전후한 시기에 일본이 해양력에 기초해서 동아시아 해양공간에서 세력권 확장을 기획하는 대동아공영권 정책을 구체화했고, 21세기에는 중국이 도련선 개념을 구체화하면서 동아시아 해양공간을 관리하려는 지정전략을 구사하고 있다. 중국의 도련선 전략이 미국을 비롯한 동아시아 국가들의 반발에 직면해 있는 상황에서 한국외교의 해양세력 의존정책이 21세기 현재에도 유용한가에 대한 질문을 던진다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성준. 1998. "알프레드 마한(A.T.Mahan)의 해양력과 해양사에 관한 인식: 그 의의와 한계를 중심으로." 해운물류연구 제26호. 331-370.
  2. 김순규. 2000. 현대국제정치학. 서울: 박영사.
  3. 김열수. 2012. "미국의 신국방전략과 한국의 대비 전략." 국가전략 제18권 2호. 171-194.
  4. 김우현. 2001. 세계정치질서. 서울: 한울.
  5. 김주식 옮김. 1999. 해양력이 역사에 미치는 영향 2. 서울: 책세상.
  6. 남문희. 2011. "중국의 나진 진출을 경계하라." 시사IN 제175호.
  7. 이기탁. 1997. 현대국제정치이론. 서울: 博英社.
  8. 이영형. 2006. 지정학. 서울: 엠애드.
  9. 정재흥. 2013. "중국의 부상과 해양군사전략 재편," INChinaBrief. vol.253, 1-12.
  10. 최연구. 1999. "동유럽.발칸 문제의 지정학적 고찰." 동유럽발칸학 창간호, 327-342.
  11. 필립 모로 드파르쥐 지음, 이대희.최연구 옮김. 1997. 지정학 입문. 공간과 권력의 정치학. 서울 : 새물결.
  12. K.A.베슬러 저, 安在鶴 역. 1995. 정치지리학. 서울: 명보문화사.
  13. Z. Brzezinski 지음, 김명섭 옮김. 2003. 거대한 체스판. 21세기 미국의 세계 전략과 유라시아. 서울: 삼인.
  14. Brzezinski, Z. 1986. Game Plan. N.Y.: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
  15. Cha Chun-ming. 1999. "Chinese Navy Heads Toward Modernization." Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong: 11 April 1999), B6, in Foreign Broadcast Information Serive-China (FBIS-CHI)-1999-0418.
  16. Cliff, R. et al. 2007. Entering the dragon's lair: Chinese antiaccess strategies and their implications for the United States. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
  17. Cohen, S.B. 1963. Geography and Politics in a World Divided. N.Y.: Random House.
  18. Cole, B.D. 2011. "Drawing Lines at Sea," United States Naval Institute Proceedings. Vol.137, No.11, 48-51.
  19. Cuyvers, L. 1993. Sea Power: A Global Journey. Maryland: Naval Institute Press.
  20. Dean Cheng. 2015. "China's Pivot to the Sea: The Modernizing PLA Navy." BACKGROUNDER, NO. 3084: 1-8; http://thf-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/2015/BG3084.pdf(2017/08/18)
  21. Department of Defense. 2012. Joint Operational Access Concept, Version1.0. Washington D.C.: Department of Defense.
  22. Dooley. H.J. 2012. "The Great Leap Outward: China's Maritime Renaissance." The Journal of East Asian Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 1. 53-76.
  23. Dougherty J.E. and Phaltzgraff, R.L. Jr. 1990. Contending Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publishers.
  24. Duus, P. 2008. "The Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Dream and Reality." Journal of Northeast Asian History, Volume 5, number 1, 143-154.
  25. Erickson, A.S. Goldstein, L.J. and Lloyd, C. eds. 2009. China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.
  26. Etzold, T.H. 1915. Is Mahan still Valid?, Proceeding, Jan-Feb. US. Naval Institute
  27. Gorshkov, S. 1979. The Sea Power of the State. Pergamon Press.
  28. "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere." https://www.wikiplanet.click/enciclopedia/en/(2017/08/24).
  29. "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere." http://www.bill-gordon.net/papers/coprospr.htm(2017/08/29).
  30. Kearsley, H.J. 1992. Maritime Power in the Twenty-first Century. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing.
  31. Kulshrestha, S. 2016. "OPINION ${\mid}$ Tonga and the Third Island Chain" IndraStra Global, no. 02: http://www.indrastra.com/2016/02/OPINIONTonga-and-Third-Island-Chain-002-02-2016-0070.html (2017/08/10).
  32. Mahan, A.T. 1907. From Sail to Steam. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  33. Mahan, A.T. 1905. The Problem of Asia and Its Effect upon International Policies. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
  34. Mahan, A.T. 1925. The Influence of Sea Power upon History. 1660-1783. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
  35. Mahan, A.T. 1962. "The Influence of seapower upon history"in Harold and Margaret Sprout, Foundations of International politics. New York: D.Van Nostrand Co.. 320-325.
  36. Mahan, A.T. 1970. The Interest of American in Sea Power: Present and Future. Kennikat Press.
  37. Modelski, G. & Thompson, W. 1988. Sea power in Global Politics, 1494-1993 (Macmillan).
  38. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2011, ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2011.
  39. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2012. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS: Military and Security Developments Involving the People''s Republic of China 2012.
  40. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2013. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2013.
  41. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2015. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2015.
  42. Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2017. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017.
  43. Pehrson, C.J. 2006. String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China's Rising Power across the Asian Littoral (Strategic Studies Institute).
  44. Pugh, M. 1996. "Is Mahan Still Alive? State Naval Power in the International System," Journal of Conflict Studies, Vol 16, No 2; https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/article/view/11817/12641(2017/08/30)
  45. Tan Rukun. 2012. Operational Strength Construction Teaching Materials. Beijing: Military Science Publishing House.
  46. Tanguy Struye de Swielande. 2012. "The Reassertion of the United States in the Asia-Pacific Region," Parameters, Spring, 75-89.
  47. Umetsu, H. 1996. "Communist China's entry into the Korean hostilities and a US proposal for a collective security arrangement in the Pacific offshore island chain," Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol 15, No, 2, 98-118.
  48. Xu Jian. 2014. "Rethinking China's Period of Strategic Opportunity," China Institute of International Studies, May 28; http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2014-05/28/content_6942258.htm(2017/09/25)
  49. Yoshihara, T. 2012. "China's Vision of Its Seascape: The First Island Chain and Chinese Seapower," Asian Politics & Policy, Volume 4, Issue 3, 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01349.x
  50. Zhang Jing. 2014. Maritime Military Strategic Concepts. Beijing: National Defense University Publishing House.
  51. Zheng Weiping and Liu Minfu. 2005. Discussions on the Military's New Historic Missions. Beijing: People's Armed Police Publishing House.
  52. Гаджиев, К.С. 1996. "Геополитика: История и совреме нное содержание дисциплин ы," Полис, no 2, 169-183.
  53. Дугин, А. 1997. Основы геополитики: Геополит ическое будущее Росси и. М.: Арктогея.
  54. Тихонравов, Ю.В. 2000. Геополитика. М.: ИНФРА-М.