Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improvement for Classification of Fiction to Enhance to Accessibility for Middle School Students

중학생의 소설 접근성을 증진시키기 위한 소설 분야 분류 개선 방안에 관한 연구

  • 조혜전 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학) ;
  • 정연경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학)
  • Received : 2018.02.18
  • Accepted : 2018.03.14
  • Published : 2018.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fiction is a collection that most students read and borrow in school libraries. KDC has several limitations when students look for fiction books they need. In line with this, we surveyed various cases of fiction classifications used in libraries, bookstores, and publishers and use behaviors of fiction of middle school students. Based upon the result of the surveys, we proposed a better way of classifying fiction books according to user needs. In addition to the KDC number, color bands were attached according to genres so that users could easily find the desired books. These suggestions and other information will enhance the accessibility and discoverability to fiction books for middle school students and may be used as reference materials for fiction classification in libraries, bookstores, and publishers in the future.

소설은 학교도서관에서 학생들이 가장 많이 열람하고 대출하는 장서이다. KDC는 학생들이 원하는 다양한 소설을 찾는데 제한점을 가진다. 이에 본 연구는 도서관과 서점, 출판사 등에서 사용하고 있는 소설 분류의 다양한 사례와 중학생의 소설 이용 행태를 설문 조사하여 이용자 요구에 맞게 소설 분류 개선안을 제안하였다. KDC 기호에 더하여 소설의 장르별 색띠를 부착하여 이용자들이 손쉽게 원하는 소설을 찾을 수 있도록 하였으며 추가적인 사항은 중학생들의 소설 접근성과 발견성을 향상시키고 향후 도서관이나 서점, 출판사에서 사용하는 소설 분야 세분에 대한 참고자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2016). 학교도서관 장서관리 실태조사 및 장서관리지침. 충남: 공주대학교. Ministry of Education (2016). A survey on school archives with a research on their guidelines (including criteria for material selection). Chungnam: Kongju National University.
  2. 김나름, 김태수 (2006). 소설 주제 접근체계의 확장 연구: 상징과 모티프를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 69-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.069 Kim, Na-Reum, & Kim, Tae-Soo (2006). A study on enhancing subject access to fiction focused on symbol and motif. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 69-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.069
  3. 김성원 (2012) 한국십진분류법(KDC) 한국소설항목의 세분방안에 대한 연구: 공공도서관을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(3), 57-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.3.057 Kim, Sungwon (2012). A research on close classification for Korean fiction in KDC: Focusing on public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(3), 57-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.3.057
  4. 노지현 (2010). 장르 분류의 사례를 통해 본 도서관 분류의 의미: 북미 공공도서관을 중심으로. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(4), 151-170. Rho, Jee-Hyun (2010). The meanings of genre classification in library classification: the case of American public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(4), 151-170.
  5. 미래출판전략연구소 (2015). 독자의 도서발견 채널과 국내외 책의 발견성 강화 동향. 전주: 한국출판문화산업진흥원. Institute of Future Publishing Strategy (2015). The discovery channel of the readers and the discovery strength of domestic and foreign books. Jeonju: Korea Publishing Culture Industry Promotion Agency.
  6. 박지영 (2010). 시소러스를 연계한 문학류 패싯 분류체계 개발. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3), 77-89. Park, Ziyoung (2010). Developing a faceted classification scheme integrated with a thesaurus for literature. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(3), 77-89.
  7. 백지원 (2010). 주제어 기반 분류에 관한 연구: 미국 공공도서관의 사례를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4), 179-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.179 Baek, Ji-Won (2010). Analysis of word based classification of U.S. public libraries and its implication. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4), 179-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.179
  8. 백지원 (2011). 이용자 중심의 주제어 기반 분류를 위한 주제명 개발에 관한 연구: 지식조직체계 분석을 바탕으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 171-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.171 Baek, Ji-Won (2011). A study on construction of subject headings for the word based classification. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 171-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.171
  9. 오경은, 김기영 (2008). 문헌분류방식에 따른 도서탐색용이성에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.025 Oh, Kyong-Eun, & Kim, Gi-Yeong (2008). A study on the convenience in finding books according to classifications: Focused on the classifications in public libraries and bookstores. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.025
  10. 장지숙 (2006). 뉴베리 수상작 주제 분석을 통한 어린이 독서자료 선정 효율화 방안에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 17(1), 63-79. Jang, Ji-sug (2006). A study on selection efficiency scheme in children's books through subject analysis of the Newbery medal winner's books. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 17(1), 63-79.
  11. 정해성 (2003). 문학류를 위한 새로운 분류체계에 대한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 34(2), 273-296. Chung, Hae-Sung (2003). A study on the proposed faceted scheme for literature. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(2), 273-296.
  12. 최석두 (2001). 이용자지향 소설검색시스템의 설계에 대한 연구. 지식처리연구, 2(2), 1-38. Choi, Sukdoo (2001). A study on under-oriented fiction retrieval system design. Journal of Knowledge Processing and Management, 2(2), 1-38.
  13. 최지영 (2011). 소설의 접근점 확장에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. Choi, Ji Young (2011). A study of expanding access points for fiction. A master's thesis in Ewha Womans University.
  14. 한국출판문화산업진흥원 (2016). 국내도서분류체계 표준화 방안 연구. 전주: 한국출판문화산업진흥원. Book Trade Promotion (2016). A study on standardization method of Korean book classification system. Jeonju: Publication Industry Promotion Agency of Korea.
  15. 한만성 (2000). 한국소설 주제색인 연구. 석사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. Han, Mahn Soung (2000). A study on subject indexing of Korean fiction. A master's thesis in Yonsei University.
  16. Batley, S. (2014). Classification in the theory and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Chandos.
  17. Dumas, E. P. (2005). Give'em what they want! Reorganizing your fiction collection by genre. Library Media Connection, 24(2), 20-22.
  18. Saarti, J. (1997). Feeding with the spoon, or the effects shelf classification on fiction on the loaning of fiction. Information Service and Use, 17, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-1997-172-312
  19. 국립어린이청소년도서관 (2017, November). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from https://www.nlcy.go.kr/menu/12110/program/50009/searchSimple.do
  20. 교보문고 (2017, November). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://www.kyobobook.co.kr/categoryRenewal/categoryMain.laf?linkClass=01&mallGb=KOR&orderClick=daa
  21. 교하도서관 (2018, January). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://www.pajulib.or.kr/ghlib/search/search.aspx
  22. 느티나무도서관 (2018, January). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://www.neutinamu.org/sub/sub_04.html?mNum=0
  23. 신주쿠 중앙도서관 (2018, January). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from https://www.library.shinjuku.tokyo.jp/WebOpac/webopac/selectsearch.do?searchkbn=2&histnum=1
  24. 알라딘 (2017, November). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://www.aladin.co.kr/shop/wbrowse.aspx?CID=1&start=we_header
  25. 에비나시립중앙도서관 (2018, January). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from https://ebina.city-library.jp/library/ja/library_search/conditions
  26. 예스24 (2017, November). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://www.yes24.com/24/Category/Display/001001017001
  27. 독서교육종합지원시스템 서울디지털자료실지원센터 전농중학교 (2018, January). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from http://reading.ssem.or.kr/r/reading/search/schoolSearchForm.jsp
  28. 한국민족문화대백과사전 (2018, January). Definition of Fiction. Retrieved from http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=557709&cid=46645&categoryId=46645
  29. 한국출판문화산업진흥원 (2018, January). Retrieved from http://www.kpipa.or.kr
  30. Amazon (2017, November). Classification of Fiction. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/books-used-books-textbooks/b/ref=nav_shopall_bo_t3?ie=UTF8&node=283155
  31. Book Industry Communication (2018, January). Retrieved from http://www.bic.org.uk
  32. Book Industry Study Group (2018, January). Retrieved from http://bisg.org/page/BISACSubjecCode
  33. Booknet Canada (2018, January). Retrieved from http://www.booknetcanada.ca/classification-schemes/
  34. EDItEUR (2018, January). Retrieved from http://www.editeur.org