DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Suitable REDD+ Sites Based on Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Case Study of Myanmar

  • Park, Jeongmook (Department of Forest Management, Division of Forest Sciences, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Sim, Woodam (Department of Forest Management, Division of Forest Sciences, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jungsoo (Department of Forest Management, Division of Forest Sciences, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2018.12.10
  • Accepted : 2018.12.17
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

In this study, the deforestation and forest degradation areas have been obtained in Myanmar using a land cover lamp (LCM) and a tree cover map (TCM) to get the $CO_2$ potential reduction and the strength of occurrence was evaluated by using the geostatistical technique. By applying a multiple criteria decision-making method to the regions having high strength of occurrence for the $CO_2$ potential reduction for the deforestation and forest degradation areas, the priority was selected for candidate lands for REDD+ project. The areas of deforestation and forest degradation were 609,690ha and 43,515ha each from 2010 to 2015. By township, Mong Kung had the highest among the area of deforestation with 3,069ha while Thlangtlang had the highest in the area of forest degradation with 9,213 ha. The number of $CO_2$ potential reduction hotspot areas among the deforestation areas was 15, taking up the $CO_2$ potential reduction of 192,000 ton in average, which is 6 times higher than that of all target areas. Especially, the township of Hsipaw inside the Shan region had a $CO_2$ potential reduction of about 772,000 tons, the largest reduction potential among the hotpot areas. There were many $CO_2$ potential reduction hot spot areas among the forest degradation area in the eastern part of the target region and has the $CO_2$ potential reduction of 1,164,000 tons, which was 27 times higher than that of the total area. AHP importance analysis showed that the topographic characteristic was 0.41 (0.40 for height from surface, 0.29 for the slope and 0.31 for the distance from water area) while the geographical characteristic was 0.59 (0.56 for the distance from road, 0.56 for the distance from settlement area and 0.19 for the distance from Capital). Yawunghwe, Kalaw, and Hsi Hseng were selected as the preferred locations for the REDD+ candidate region for the deforestation area while Einme, Tiddim, and Falam were selected as the preferred locations for the forest degradation area.

Keywords

References

  1. American Carbon Registry. 2010. Methodology for REDD Avoiding Planned Deforestation. American Carbon Registry, Arlington.
  2. Bae JS, Kim YH, Han GJ. 2013. Trends in the forest carbon market and new opportunities for forest management. KREI, Naju, E04-2013. pp 523-557.
  3. Bae JS, Seol MH. 2012. Selection of Bilateral Cooperative Countries between Korea and Developing Countries for REDD+: Based on Forest Coverage Rate and Deforestation Rate. J Korean Soc Int Agric 24: 397-403.
  4. Bhagwat T, Hess A, Horning N, Khaing T, Thein ZM, Aung KM, Aung KH, Phyo P, Tun YL, Oo AH, Neil A, Thu WM, Songer M, LaJeunesse Connette K, Bernd A, Huang Q, Connette G, Leimgruber P. 2017. Losing a jewel-Rapid declines in Myanmar's intact forests from 2002-2014. PLoS One 12: e0176364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176364
  5. FAO. 2015. Global forest resources assessment 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp 7.
  6. Fuller DO, Meijaard EM, Christy L, Jessup TC. 2010. Spatial assessment of threats to biodiversity within East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Appl Geogr 30: 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.11.004
  7. Jo HW, Chi KH, Cha S, Kim E, Lee WK. 2017. Relationship Analysis between Lineaments and Epicenters using Hotspot Analysis: The Case of Geochang Region, South Korea. Korean J Remote Sens 33: 469-480. https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.5.1.2
  8. Kim DK, Kin YW, Lee SM. 2007. Assessment of tourism resource development by the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Focusing on the Planning Process. Korea J Tour Hosp Res 21: 5-18.
  9. Korea Forest Service. 2014. REDD+ Textbook. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, pp 23-25.
  10. Lee JH, Kim SI, Han KS, Lee YW. 2011. Hotspot Detection for Land Cover Changes Using Spatial Statistical Methods. Korean J Remote Sens 27: 601-611. https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2011.27.5.601
  11. Lin L, Pattanayak SK, Sills EO, Sunderlin WD. 2012. Site selection for forest carbon projects. Center for International Forestry Research(CIFOR), Bogor, pp 209-232.
  12. Lin L, Sills E, Cheshire H. 2013. Targeting areas for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) projects in Tanzania. Glob Environ Change 24: 277-286.
  13. Park J, Park J, Lee J. 2017. Prediction of Land Use/Land Cover Change in Forest Area Using a Probability Density Function. J For Environ Sci 33: 305-314.
  14. Park JM, Seo HS, Lee JS. 2016. Implications for Japan's National REDD+ Strategies - Focused on Joint Credit Mechanism (JCM) -. J Korean For Soc 105: 238-246. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2016.105.2.238
  15. Seok HD, Yoon BS. 2010. Understanding of the UNFCCC REDD+ Mechanism and Prospect of REDD+ Negotiations. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Seoul. Policy Research Report - P127. pp 144.
  16. Shahid M, Joshi SP. 2017. Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Carbon Stock Density in Moist Deciduous Forest of Western Himalayas, India. J For Environ Sci 33: 39-48.
  17. Sin YG. 2003. R&D Prioritization for Nuclear Power Plant Operation Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. DR thesis. Ajou University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. (in Korean)
  18. Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Creed A, Nguyen N, Sunnenberg G, Miles L, Lovett A, Joppa L, Ashton R, Scharlemann JPW, Cronenberger F, Iribarrem A. 2013. Biophysical suitability, economic pressure and land-cover change: a global probabilistic approach and insights for REDD+. Sustain Sci 9: 129-141.
  19. Tanaka R. 2014. Incorporating carbon and biodiversity based on topographic heterogeneity for REDD suitability analysis: a case study of the Central Highlands, Vietnam. MS thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  20. Verified Carbon Standard(VCS). 2017. Methodology for Imple mentation of REDD+ Activities in Landscapes Affected By Mosaic Deforestation and Degradation. Verra, Washington, pp 7.