References
- Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-20. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0096
- Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20:329-39.
- Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F. The Cerec system: computer-assisted preparation of direct ceramic inlays in 1 setting. Quintessenz 1987;38:457-70.
- Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
- van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
- Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:542-51.
- Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
- Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x
- Ghazal M, Kern M. Mounting casts on an articulator using interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:408-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60247-4
- Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting. J Prosthodont 2004;13:42-6.
- Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont 2004;13:150-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04024.x
- Lassila V. Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:215-8.
- Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: polyether, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90225-2
- Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: plaster, impression compound, and wax. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:263-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90192-F
- Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:816-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01870.x
- Skurnik H. Accurate interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 1969;21:154-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(69)90088-2
- Balthazar-Hart Y, Sandrik JL, Malone WF, Mazur B, Hart T. Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:586-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90416-9
- Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B, Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:152-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90251-8
- Balthazar YM, Ziebert GJ, Donegan SJ. Effect of interocclusal records on transverse axis position. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:804-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80008-6
- Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Kinderknecht KE. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:265-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90465-0
- Vergos VK, Tripodakis AP. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:365-8.
- Frank E, Frank S. Bite registration in Cerec and in lab. Int J Comput Dent 2012;15:149-158.
- Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:361-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90346-C
- Ruge S, Quooss A, Kordass B. Variability of closing movements, dynamic occlusion, and occlusal contact patterns during mastication. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:119-27.
- Ruge S, Kordass B. 3D-VAS-initial results from computerized visualization of dynamic occlusion. Int J Comput Dent 2008;11:9-16.
- Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
- Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
- Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-94.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
- Sorensen JA. Accuracy of Full-Arch Scanning With Intra-Oral Scanners. Available from: https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/abstract/43am-185064/accuracy-of-full-arch-scanning-with-intra-oral-scanners (updated 2018 Mar 16).
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp 2014 Apr 29;(86).
- Keeling AJ, Brunton PA, Holt RJ. Optical inter-oc-clusal records are repeatable and accurate. Available from: https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/abstract/14iags-188378/optical-interocclusal-records-arerepeatable-and-accurate (updated 2018 Mar 16).
- Solaberrieta E, Arias A, Brizuela A, Garikano X, Pradies G. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:52-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.013
- Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A, Otegi JR, Pradies G, Szentpetery A. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:7173824.
Cited by
- 치과용 모형의 모형 부착 과정에서 발생하는 오차에 대한 문헌 고찰 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.146