DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업의 지식경영시스템이 학습지향성에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Corporate Knowledge Management System on Learning Orientation

  • Choi, Seung-Il (Dept. of International Trade, Changwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Il (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.06
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28

초록

경쟁에서 살아남기 위해서 기업들은 새로운 지식을 개발하고, 적용 및 전달하며 수많은 지식경영활동을 축적해 오고 있다. 그러므로 효과적인 지식경영을 도입 및 홀용을 위해서는 효율적인 지식경영시스템의 구축과 운영이 중요한 요인으로 볼 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 지식경영에서 주요한 결과로 나타나는 조직의 학습지향성과 지식경영과의 관계를 확인 하는데 있다. 즉, 본 연구는 기업의 지식경영시스템이 기업구성원의 학습지향성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지를 살펴 봄으로써 향후 기업의 지식경영의 방향설정에 기초가 되고자 연구하였다. 본 연구는 이론 및 선행 연구를 종합하고 가설과 연구모형을 개발하고 설문지조사를 통해 실증분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구는 지식경영시스템은 학습 성장의지에 유이한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 지식경영시스템은 내부개선의지에 통계적으로 유의한 관계에 있는 것으로 확인 되었다. 그러므로 지지경영시스템의 성공적인 운영과 관리를 위해서는 조직의 전략적이고 적합한 학습모형과 조직 구성원의 역할에 초점을 맞출 수 있는 시스템의 유지 관리가 중요한 변수로 볼 수 있다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 실무분야에서 뿐만 아니라 조직의 지식경영시스템의 연구에도 유의한 지침을 제공 할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

In order to survive the competition, companies are developing new knowledge, applying and communicating, and accumulating numerous knowledge management activities. Therefore, it is important to establish and operate an effective knowledge management system to introduce and utilize effective knowledge management. So, the purpose of this study is to confirm the relation between the learning orientation of the organization and the knowledge management which are the main results in the knowledge management. In other words, this study investigated how the knowledge management system of a company affects the learning orientation of the corporate members, so as to be a basis for establishing the direction of knowledge management in the future. This study synthesized theory and previous studies, developed hypotheses and research models, and conducted empirical analysis through questionnaire surveys. This study is analyzed that knowledge management system has a positive effect on learning growth will. In addition, it was confirmed that the knowledge management system has a statistically significant relationship with the intention of internal improvement. Therefore, for the successful operation and management of the support management system, maintenance of the system that can focus on the strategic and appropriate learning model of the organization and the role of the organization member is an important variable. The results of this study are expected to provide meaningful guidance not only in the practical field but also in the study of the organization's knowledge management system.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

Table 1. Analysis of Basis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Factor, Reliability analysis of Entrepreneurship

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Factor, Reliability analysis of study directivity

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Factor, Reliability analysis of study directivity

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Verification of Hypothesis 1

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Verification of Hypothesis 2

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0006.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. C. H. Kim & S. W. Byun. (2002). A Study on Prerequisite Factors of Knowledge Management and Mediating Effects on the Organizational Behavior. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 5, 217-235.
  2. P. H. Gray. (2000). The Effects of Knowledge Management System on Emergent Teams : Towards a Research Model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00040-8
  3. W. E. Baker & J. M. Sinkula. (1999). Learning Orientation, Market Orientation, and Innovation; Integration and Extending Model of Organizational Performance. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009830402395
  4. H. Sujan, B. A. Weitz & N. Kumar. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800303
  5. C. S. Dweck & E. L. Leggett. (1989). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
  6. R. L. Ruggles. (1997). Tools for Knowledge Management: Introduction, in Knowledge Management Tools, Butterworth-Heiemann, Newton: MA, 1-8.
  7. E. S. Jung. (2000). Knowledge Management Strategy in R & D: Case Study of R & D Activities in Heavy Industry, KAIST Master Thesis.
  8. S. G. Kim. (2014). Study on the effect of knowledge management success factors impact on the knowledge management activities of R&D center, Sungkyunkwan University Master of business Administration.
  9. S. F. Slater & J. C. Narver. (1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization, Journal of Marketing, 59(Jul), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900106
  10. Y. Zhao, Y. Li, S. H. Li & L. B. Chen. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organizational Learning and Performance: Evidence from China, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042-2587.
  11. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  12. D. J. Shin & D. Y. Cho. (2017). The Moderating Effect of Critically Reflective Work Behavior on Relationship between Learning Orientation and Innovative Behavior in A Company. Korea HRD Review, 12(2), 165-190.
  13. S. G. Song. (2017). Relationship between Technology Innovation Capability, R&D Knowledge Management and Technological Innovation Performance. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 30(3), 1905-1925.
  14. J. M. Chou & S. H. Bae. (2017). The Usage Patterns of MCSs, and the Activation of Knowledge Management Processes for Corporate Innovations: Innovation Openness. Korean Management Science Review, 9(34), 43-60.
  15. C. W. Park. (2016). A Study on the Effect of Entrepreneurship and Self-Efficacy on Knowledge Management : Focusing on Female CEO. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(11), 11-26.