디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권11호
  • /
  • Pages.221-230
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보기술과 기업조직의 관계에 관한 연구

Relationship Between Information Technology and Corporate Organization

  • 김락상 (청주대학교 경상대학 경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.13
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기업의 창업가들과 경영자들은 글로벌 대기업들에 의해 지배되고 있는 산업들에서 성공하기 위해 필요한 규모 및 능력을 달성하기 위해서 협력업체들과의 확장된 네트워크를 잘 이용할 줄 알아야 한다는 사실을 목격하게 된다. 기업의 경영자들은 간소하지만 민첩한 기업을 만들고자 한다면, 그들은 어떻게 기업의 조직구조 모델이 운영효율성, 유연성에 영향을 미치게 되는지, 그리고 어떻게 기업 조직을 기업환경과 전략(기회와 위협을 감지하고 대응할 수 있는)에 맞게 조정해야 하는지를 이해해야 한다. 본 연구는 요즘처럼 빠르게 변하고 불확실한 기업 환경에서 생존하고 번창할 수 있는 기업을 만들기 위해 필요한 역량들을 검토한다. 본 논문에 제시된 것 들은 빠르게 변하는 글로벌 경제의 수요에 대처하려 했던 수백 명의 경영자들과 기업창업자들의 지난 20년 동안의 노력의 결과들이다[1]. 본 연구의 결과는 정보기술(IT)이 기업의 성공을 위해 필요한 역량 및 조직구조를 개발하는데 있어서 필요한 가이드라인을 제공한다. 본 연구는 계량적인 연구 모델을 제시하지 못하는 한계점을 가지고 있으나, 최근의 정보기술 환경에서 기업들이 조직의 구조를 설계하는데 있어 고려해야할 점들과 지침을 제공하는 것이 연구의 목적이다.

Most of researchers and business futurists agree that traditional organizational designs are inadequate for coping with today's turbulent and increasingly networked world. Executives in small firms find that their organizations must tap into an extended network of partners to achieve the scale and power needed to succeed in industries dominated by large, global firms. As they attempt to build lean yet agile businesses, these executives are finding that they no longer rely on gut instinct alone. Neither can they simply copy organizational model that worked in the past. They must understand how organizational design choices influence operational efficiency and flexibility and, even more important, how to best align the organization with the environment and the strategy chosen to quickly and effectively sense and respond to opportunities and threats This research examines the capabilities required to build businesses that can survive and prosper in today's fast-faced and uncertain environment. The insights presented in this research have emerged from over 30 years of work with hundreds of executives and entrepreneurs as they struggled to build businesses that could cope with the demands of a rapidly changing, networked global economy. The insights from this research suggest that IT is an important enabler for developing the best capabilities required for success.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_221_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Change of Organizational Structure

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_221_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Redefinition of Authority Systems*

참고문헌

  1. L. M. Applegate. (1999). In search of a New Organization. in Shaping Organizational Form: Communication, Connection, and Community. eds. G. DeSanctis and J. Fulk (Newbury Park, CA:Sage).
  2. J. Welch. (1988). Managing in the 90s, GE Report to Shareholders.
  3. C. Bartlett & S. Ghoshal. (1991). Managing across Borders: The Transactional Solution(Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
  4. R. Stevenson. (1995. 2. 27). Markets Shaken as a British Bank Takes a Big Loss. New York Times
  5. G. Millman. (1995. 2. 28). Barings Collapses: Financial System Bears Up Well. Wall Street Journal.
  6. S. Lypin & G. B. Krecht. (1995. 2. 28). How Many Other Barings Are There? Wall Street Journal.
  7. G. Morgan. (1997). Images of Organizations(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications). p. 78.
  8. P. Lawrence & J. Lorsch. (1966). Organization and Environment (Boston: Harvard Business School Press)
  9. J. Galbraith. (1977). Organization Design (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
  10. R. Miles & C. Snow. (1986). Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms. California Management Review 28, pp. 62-73
  11. M. Hammer & J. Champy. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation (New York Harper Business)
  12. J. Collins and J. Porras, Built to Last (New York Harper Business).
  13. R. Walton. (1988). Up and Running (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
  14. P. Shrivastava. (1983). A Topology of Organizational Learning Systems, Journal of Management Studies, 20, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00195.x
  15. Walsh and Ungson. (1991). "Organizational Memory," Academy of Management Review, 16, 57-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278992
  16. H. Simon. (1991). "Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, 1, 133.
  17. Garvin. (1993. 7). "Building a Learning Organization," Harvard Business Review.
  18. M. Jensen & W. Meckling. (1973). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 305-360.
  19. E. Fama. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economics, 288-307.
  20. T. Kim & M. Rhee. (2009). Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100125
  21. P. Madsen & V. Desai. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51467631
  22. M. v. (2009), Does reputation contribute to reducing organizational errors? A learning approach. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 676-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00830.x
  23. W. K. Smith & M. W. Lewis. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
  24. S. M. Lee & K. J. Seok. (2012). The Impact of Introducing Factor in the ERP Systems on Management Performance-Mediating Effects of Internal Performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(5), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.5.155
  25. S. J. Oh & Y. Y. Kim. (2015). A Study on Organizations Adopting Convergence-based Smart Work for Overcoming Constraints and Achieving Performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(6), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.6.113