Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Theory on 'antisocial' of Social Economy

사회적 경제의 '반사회적(antisocial)'인 것에 대한 시론

  • Hong, Sung-Woon (Division of Police, Law and Public Administration, Gwangju University)
  • 홍성운 (광주대학교 경찰법행정학부)
  • Received : 2018.09.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In our society, recently, the concept of social economy stands out as an alternative to the mainstream economy in the market. It is noteworthy that although the social economy has the nature of practical field of civil society, the government has a willingness to actively support the social economy as a means of getting visible result of job creation. The social economy in Korea is being fostered by the government and understood within the framework of a very limited policy goal of providing jobs for the vulnerable. The problem is that the social value and community implications of the social economy are disappearing while the social economic organizations have higher policy status and become more and more dependent on the government's financial support. This paper suggests that the discourse on the social economy should be reconstructed while holding the problem of this situation.

최근 우리나라의 사회영역에서는 주류 경제에 대한 대안으로 사회적 경제라는 개념이 두각을 나타내고 있다. 주목할 부분은 사회적 경제가 시민사회의 실천 영역이라는 본성을 지니고 있음에도 불구하고, 정부가 일자리 창출이라는 가시적 성과를 얻는 수단으로 적극 지원육성하려는 의지를 지니고 있다는 것이다. 이처럼 우리나라에서 사회적 경제는 정부 주도로 육성되고 있으며, 사회적 약자 및 취약계층 일자리 제공이라는 매우 한정된 정책목표 속에서 이해되고 있다. 그러나 사회적 경제 조직들의 정책적 위상이 높아지는 동시에 정부의 재원에 의존하는 비중이 커지면서, 사회적 경제가 지향하는 사회적 가치와 공동체적 함의도 사라지는 문제점이 대두되고 있다. 본 논문은 이러한 상황에 대한 문제의식을 견지하면서 사회적 경제에 대한 담론을 재구성할 것을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Money Today. (2018). W. S. Park, Mayor of GSEF, 'Addressing Urban Issues with Social Economy'. 2018.10.2.
  2. Daegu Newspaper. (2018) 'The good social economy that can not get sympathy'. 2018.10.15.
  3. H. S. Um. (2010). Present and implication of social enterprise in rural areas in Europe. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  4. Y. C. Kim. (2011). Social Economy and Endogenous Local Development. Journal of regional studies, 19(2), 25-49. http://uci.or.kr/G704-001492.2011.19.2.004.
  5. H. S. Jin & J. R. Song. (2013). A Study on Karl Polanyi's 'Transformational' Social Economic Idea-Focusing on the Social Values in the Market Economy. Journal of Social Thoughts and Culture, (28), 267-315.
  6. J. M. Na, G. R. Kim, S. Lee, Y. S. Yun & C. M. Oh. (2013). National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences.
  7. J. W. Kim. (2014). Social Economy and Reciprocity : Reconstruction of Society by Economic Activity. Journal of regional studies, 22(2), 285-308.
  8. K. H. Kim. (2013). The Local Innovation through the Activation of Social Economy, and Its Expectation and Limitation : centered on Community Businesses and Cooperatives, Journal of Public Society, 3(2), 126-150.
  9. E. S. Lee & H. J. Lee. (2017). The Concept, Development and Institutionalization of Social Economy: Focusing on Polanyi's Double Movement. Korean Social and Administrative Studies, 28(1), 100-138.
  10. J. W. Kim. (2016). Social Enterprise and Neoliberal Governmentality in South Korea - Focusing on Governing the Social. Economy and Society, (110), 164-200.
  11. M. H. Shin. (2009). A study of conceptualizing 'social economy' in the context of Korean society. Journal of Korean Social Trend and Perspective, (75), 11-46.
  12. N. Y. Sun & N. H. Park. (2011). Analysis of Influencing Factors on Socio-Economic Performance of Social Enterprise. Local Government Research, 15(2), 141-164.
  13. J. I. Kim. (2012). Growth model for social enterprises in local government : Focused on practices of social enterprises in Jeju. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 16(1), 67-88.
  14. H. S. Kim. (2012). Analysing the Sustainability of Social Enterprises in the Community. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 16(1), 259-277.
  15. S. K. Rhee & J. Y. Rha. (2010). Measuring the Socioeconomic Value of Social Enterprises : Social Return on Investment Revisited. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 13(3), 41-56.
  16. J. H. Kim & J. K. Lee. (2012). An Analysis on the Economic and Social Performance of the Social Enterprises in Korea : Focusing on the Effects of Governmental Subsidies. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 1037-1064.
  17. G. G. Kim & Y. S. Yun. (2015). Possibilities and Limits of Community Movement in Relation to the Social Economy : Focused on social enterprises, community businesses and cooperative associations in Gwangju. Journal of regional studies, 23(2), 1-25.
  18. S. W. Hong & C. M. Oh. (2017). Final Report on the study of social funding for the development of social ecosystem. Gwangju Support Center for Social Economy.
  19. J. W. Bae. (2011). A Study on the Expansion of Social Enterprises from the Marketization of Social Services. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 1(1), 31-58.
  20. S. K. Nam. (2015). A Study on Social Economy and Endogenous Local Development. The Journal of Incheon Studies, 1(23), 85-124.
  21. S. Y. Kim. (2013). Association and cultural independence - The problem of social in the social economy -. The Journal of Culture and Science, (73), 110-128.
  22. M. H. Ryu. (2012). The development of regional and market formation of Social enterprise : focused on socio-economic cooperation framework in Won-ju. Journal of Critical Social Policy, (36), 76-104.
  23. J. Y. Choi, B. H. Lee, Y. K. Kim., J. S. Kim & S. E. Yoon. (2015). A Case Study on Local Community and Social Economy for the DDABOK Community Promotion. Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  24. H. S. Jin & J. R. Song. (2013). A Study on Karl Polanyi's 'Transformational' Social Economic Idea- Focusing on the Social Values in the Market Economy. Journal of Social Thoughts and Culture, (28), 267-315.
  25. H. S. Kim. (2016). Trends and Issues in Social Economics Research: Centering on Domestic Journal Articles, 2001-2015. Democracy and Human Rights, 16(1), 51-87.