DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computational Analysis of the Effects of Spray Parameters and Piston Shape on Syngas-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Combustion Process

  • Ali, Abubaker Ahmed M.M. (Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kabbir, Ali (Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Changup (Green Power Laboratory, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) ;
  • Lee, Yonggyu (Green Power Laboratory, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) ;
  • Oh, Seungmook (Green Power Laboratory, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) ;
  • Kim, Ki-seong (Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2018.10.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.22
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

In this study, a 3D CFD analysis method for the combustion process was established for a low calorific value syngas-diesel dual-fuel engine operating under very lean fuel-air mixture condition. Also, the accuracy of computational analysis was evaluated by comparing the experimental results with the computed ones. To simulate the combustion for the dual-fuel engine, a new dual-fuel chemical kinetics set was used that was constituted by merging two verified chemical kinetic sets: n-heptane (173 species) for diesel and Gri-mech 3.0 (53 species) for syngas. For dual-fuel mode operations, the early stage of combustion was dominated by the fuel burning inside or near the spray plume. After which, the flame propagated into the syngas in the piston bowl and then proceeded toward the syngas in the squish zone. With the baseline injection system and piston shape, a significant amount of unburned syngas was discharged. To solve this problem, effects of the injection parameters and piston shape on combustion characteristics were analyzed by calculation. The change in injection variables toward increasing the spray plume volume or the penetration length were effective to cause fast burning in the vicinity of TDC by widening the spatial distribution of diesel acting as a seed of auto-ignition. As a result, the unburned syngas fraction was reduced. Changing the piston shape with the shallow depth of the piston bowl and 20% squish area ratio had a significant effect on the combustion pattern and lessened the unburned syngas fraction by half.

Keywords

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Piston bowl geometry

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Computational mesh

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Experimental and numerical comparison of the incylinder pressure and HRR of syngas-diesel dual-fuel mode using new mechanism and n-heptane chemical kinetics set.

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4 Comparison of Experimental and numerical in-cylinder pressure and HRR of diesel only and dualfuel mode

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5 Comparison between the molar fraction of n-Heptane, OH, and CH with changes in crank angle

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 7 Velocity vector plot at Syngas35, IMEP5, and 6G (center plane of the 72° sector mesh)

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 9 Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure and HRR of dual-fuel mode at a different SMD

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 10 Diesel spray penetration for syngas45, IMEP5, and 8G at a different SMD

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 11 Velocity vector plot at Syngas45, IMEP5, and 8 G (center plane of the 72° sector mesh)

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 12 CO emissions and unburned syngas fraction at a different SMD

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 13 Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure and HRR of dual-fuel mode at a different spray cone angle

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 14 Diesel spray penetration for syngas45, IMEP5, and 8G at a different spray cone angle

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0013.png 이미지

Fig. 15 CO emissions and unburned syngas fraction at a different spray cone angle

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0014.png 이미지

Fig. 18 CO emissions and unburned syngas fraction at a different fuel injection rate

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0015.png 이미지

Fig. 20 Diesel spray penetration at a different crank angle for syngas45, IMEP5, and 8G at small nozzle diameter

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0016.png 이미지

Fig. 19 Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure and HRRof dual-fuel mode at a different nozzle diameter

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0017.png 이미지

Fig. 22 CO emissions and unburned syngas fraction at a different nozzle diameter

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0018.png 이미지

Fig. 26 Velocity vector plot for Syngas45, IMEP5, and 8 G at a different piston bowl (center plane of the 72° sector mesh)

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0019.png 이미지

Fig. 6 In-cylinder temperature distribution at Syngas35, IMEP5, and 6G

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0020.png 이미지

Fig. 8 CO emission and unburned syngas fraction at IMEP 5 bar

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0021.png 이미지

Fig. 16 Comparison of injection rate

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0022.png 이미지

Fig. 17 Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure and HRR of dual-fuel mode at a different fuel injection rate

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0023.png 이미지

Fig. 21 Comparison of the in-cylinder temperature distribution for different nozzle diameter (center plane of the 72° sector mesh)

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0024.png 이미지

Fig. 23 Piston bowl geometry A and B

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0025.png 이미지

Fig. 24 Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure and HRR of dual-fuel mode at a different piston bowl geometry

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0026.png 이미지

Fig. 25 CO emissions and unburned syngas fraction at a different piston bowl

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_f0027.png 이미지

Fig. 27 Comparison of the in-cylinder temperature distribution at a piston bowl (center plane of the 72° sector mesh)

Table 1 Engine specifications

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Syngas composition

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 Engine operating conditions

OMHHBZ_2018_v23n4_192_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. B. B. Sahoo, N. Sahoo, and U. K. Saha, "Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuel on the performance of dual-fuel gas diesel engines-A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Nos. 6-7, pp. 1151-1184, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.003
  2. M. Y. E. Selim, "Effect of engine parameters and gaseous fuel type on the cyclic variability of dual fuel engines," Fuel, Vol. 84, Nos. 7-8, pp. 961-971, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.11.023
  3. E. Elnajjar, M. Y. E. Selim, and M. O. Hamdan, "Experimental study of dual fuel engine performance using variable LPG composition and engine parameters," Energy conversion and Management, Vol. 76, pp. 32-42, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.050
  4. A. Bilcan, O. Le Corre, M. Tazerout, A. Ramesh, and S. Ganesan, Characterization of the LPG-diesel dual fuel combustion, 0148-7191, SAE Technical Paper, 2001.
  5. D. B. Lata, A. Misra, and S. Medhekar, "Investigations on the combustion parameters of a dual fuel diesel engine with hydrogen and LPG as secondary fuels," International journal of hydrogen energy, Vol. 36, No. 21, pp. 13808-13819, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.142
  6. P. Saxena, and F. A. Williams, "Testing a small detailed chemical-kinetic mechanism for the combustion of hydrogen and carbon monoxide," Combustion and Flame, Vol. 145, Nos. 1-2, pp. 316-323, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.10.004
  7. A. Maghbouli, R. K. Saray, S. Shafee, and J. Ghafouri, "Numerical study of combustion and emission characteristics of dual-fuel engines using 3D-CFD models coupled with chemical kinetics," Fuel, Vol. 106, pp. 98- 105, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.055
  8. F. Claudio, C. Cristian, C. Giulio, B. G. Marco, F. Stefania, B. Federico, V. Alessandro, and S. Stefano, "Numerical evaluation of the applicability of steady test bench swirl ratios to diesel engine dynamic conditions," Energy Procedia, Vol. 81, pp. 732-741, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.079
  9. G. P. Smith, D. M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C. T. Bowman, R. K. Hanson, S. Song, and W. C. Gardiner Jr, "GRImech 3.0 reaction mechanism, Berkeley", 2012.
  10. Y. Li, H. Li, H. Guo, H. Wang, and M. Yao, "A numerical study on the chemical kinetics process during autoignition of n-heptane in a direct injection compression ignition engine," Applied Energy, Vol. 212, pp. 909-918, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.067
  11. F. Maroteaux, "Development of a two-part n-heptane oxidation mechanism for two stage combustion process in internal combustion engines," Combustion and Flame, Vol. 186, pp. 1-16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.07.031
  12. W. Liang, R. Mével, and C. K. Law, "Role of low-temperature chemistry in detonation of n-heptane/oxygen/diluent mixtures," Combustion and Flame, Vol. 193, pp. 463-470, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.035
  13. B. Yang, M. Yao, W. K. Cheng, Y. Li, Z. Zheng, and S. Li, "Experimental and numerical study on different dual-fuel combustion modes fuelled with gasoline and diesel," Applied Energy, Vol. 113, pp. 722-733, 2014/ 01/01/, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.034
  14. J. E. Dec, and C. Espey, Chemiluminescence imaging of autoignition in a DI diesel engine, 0148-7191, SAE technical Paper, 1998.
  15. N. Stylianidis, U. Azimov, A. Maheri, E. Tomita, and N. Kawahara, "Chemical kinetics and CFD analysis of supercharged micro-pilot ignited dual-fuel engine combustion of syngas," Fuel, Vol. 203, pp. 591-606, 2017/ 09/01/, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.125
  16. H. J. Curran, "Developing detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for fuel combustion," Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2018/07/01/, 2018.
  17. K.-U. Munch, "Prediction of Spray Penetration for DI Engines by Means of a New Application Tool."