Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Basic Study on the Evaluation Index of Village Wetland Ecosystem Services Using Function Evaluation Methods

기능평가를 이용한 마을습지 생태계서비스 평가지표 기초연구

  • Received : 2018.02.08
  • Accepted : 2018.02.24
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to suggest an assessment indices to evaluate the ecosystem services of the unique functions of wetlands as well as economic value provided by the village wetlands. The assessment indicators applied in this study were used by the RAM indices. The results of RAM assessment on the village wetlands in Cheonan city were analyzed by item and critical functions of the village wetland. They were derived by assessment indicators of ecosystem services, and the village wetland ecosystem were presented by Focus Group Interview (FGI). The 20 critical indices were selected from 52 different indices by analyzing the wetland function assessment items. 13 indicators excluding duplicate indexes by function, were selected as ecological service impact indicators. Finally, ecosystem services were evaluated by using AHP analysis to calculate the weight of each assessment indices and apply it to the 9 village wetlands. The results of this study confirmed that the functions of the village wetlands are compliant with the ecosystem services. Based on this assessment of the unique functions of wetlands, it will serve as a methodology for assessing ecosystem services. The study was also conducted on 49 wetlands in Cheonan. The detailed assessment of wetland ecosystem services based on the wetland ecosystem function proposed by this study, was further developed as a follow-up study. It suggested that the wetland areas should be compared and be used as a general standard. In addition to the assessment of the economic value of ecosystem services provided by the village wetlands, it would be useful to assess the unique features and convert them into value.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn SE AND Bae DH. 2014. The Economic Value of Freshwater Ecosystem Services Based on the Evidences from the Environmental Valuation Information System. Journal of KOREA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION SOCIETY 22(4) : 27-54. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2014.22.4.27
  2. Hwang YR. 2018. A Study on Analysis of Wetland Function Assessment Factors and Research on the National Environmental Assessment Improvement - Focused on the Village Wetlands in Cheonan City -. M.S dissertation, SangMyung University. (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Jeon SW, Kim JU, Jung HC. 2013. A Study on the Forest Classification for Ecosystem Services Valuation - Focused on Forest Type Map and Landcover Map -. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration Technology 16(3) : 31-39. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.3.031
  4. Kim DG, Kim JG, Kim HS, Yoo BG, Ahn GS, Jang SW, Shin HG. 2011. Functional Assessment of Yongdam Dam-wetland by HGM. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 13(3) : 665-675. (in Korean with English summary)
  5. Kim EY, Kim JY, Jung HJ, Song WK. 2017. Development and Feasibility of Indicators for Ecosystem Service Evaluation of Urban Park. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 26(4) : 227-241. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2017.26.4.227
  6. Kim JU, Lee BE, Kim JG, Oh SH, Lee MJ, Kim HS. 2017. Functional Assessment of Gangcheon Replacement Wetland Using Modified HGM. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 19(3) : 318-326. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Kim YH, Li R, Moon SG, Koo BH. 2013. Functional Assessment of Jilnalnup Wetland by HGM. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration Technology 16(2) : 13-22. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.2.013
  8. Kong MJ, Lee BM, Kim NC, Son JK. 2014. The Analysis of Function and Factors for the Value Assessment of Ecosystem Service at Rice Paddy Wetland. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 16(2) : 251-259. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Koo BH, Kim GG. 2001. Classifying and Identifying the Characteristics of Wetlands in Korea -Cases on the Inland Wetlands-. Journal of The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 4(2) : 11-25. (in Korean with English summary)
  10. Koo BH, Kim KG. 2001. A Study on the Assessment for the Functions of Inland Wetlands Using RAM(Rapid Assessment Method). Journal of The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 4(3) : 38-48. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Koo BH. 2001. A Study on the Functional Evaluation of the Wetlands in the River Floodland - Application of the HGM Method. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Conference. (in Korean)
  12. Koo BH. 2002. A Study on the Classification and Mapping Methods of Wetlands in Korea. Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  13. Koo BH. 2003. Wetland Type Classification and Functional Assessment of an Abandoned Rice Paddy Ja-un Wetland. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 6(1): 65-70. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. Koo BH. 2007. Korea National Wetland Inventory. MOE, National Wetland Center, UNDP/ GEF. (in Korean with English summary)
  15. Koo BH. 2009. Wetland ecology. (in Korean)
  16. Lim WR. 2014. A study on the parks and green space policy as an ecosystem service considering public welfare: focusing on the case of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul. Ph.D dissertation, SangMyung University. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Ministry of Environment. 2001. Assessment Technique and Management Study of Inland Wetlands Depending on Their Types. (in Korean)
  18. Ministry of Environment. 2009. Discoveries and Conservation Measures of Village Wetlands at Geumgang River basin. (in Korean)
  19. National Academy of Agricultural Science. 2012. Facts and Utilization of Farming Village Small Scale Wetlands. (in Korean)
  20. NIE. 2014. National ecosystem assessment for the sustainable land management. (in Korean)
  21. NIE. 2015. Methodological Development of the Ecosystem Services Assessment and Valuation. (in Korean)
  22. Park MO, Kim HN, Koo BH. 2009. Characteristics and Function Assessment of Inland Wetlands in Chungnam Province. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 12(5): 92-100. (in Korean with English summary)
  23. Park MO, Lim SH, Li R, Kim BH, Yang SB, Koo BH. 2014. Village Wetlands Inventory and Conservation Strategy in Cheonan. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration Technology 17(6): 39-50. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.6.39
  24. Park MO, Park ML, Koo BH. 2007. A Study on Function Assessment of Coastal Wetlands for Ecological Network Establishment-Focused on the Westcoast of Chungnam Province-. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 10(6): 70-80. (in Korean with English summary)
  25. Park MO, Yang SB, Koo BH. 2015. A Study on Development of Village Wetlands Inventory Using GIS and Establishment of Management Methods in Asan City, Korea. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration Technology 18(6): 167-177. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.6.167
  26. Park MO, Hwang YR, Yang SB, Seo HS, Koo BH. 2017. A Study on the Application of National Environmental Assessment Map Using the Functional Evaluation of Wetlands. (in Korean)
  27. Park MO. 2018. A Study on Identification and Distribution of the Village Wetland Inventory Based on GIS -Focused on Seocheon-gun Province, Chungnam, Korea-. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 20(6). (in press)
  28. Ryu EH, Lee DG. 2013. Evaluation on Economic Value of the Greenbelt's Ecosystem Services in the Seoul Metropolitan Region. Journal of Korea Planning Association 48(3): 279-292. (in Korean with English summary)
  29. Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Services Sciences 1(1): 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  30. Sagong JH, Jung OS, Yeo HB. 2015. Appraising the Worth of Ecosystem Services of Ricefields in Chungcheongnam-do Region. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 21(3): 1-18. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.3.001
  31. Son JG, Kim NC, Kang BH. 2010. The Type Classification and Function Assessment at Small Palustrine Wetland in Rural Area. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration Technology 13(6): 117- 131. (in Korean with English summary)
  32. Yang BH, Cho US, Koo BH. 2005. Type Classification and Functional Assessment of a Dam Lake - In the Case of the Boryung Lake -. Journal of The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 8(6): 80-91. (in Korean with English summary)
  33. Yi GC. 2012. Development, value and use of wetland inventory. Journal of Korean Wetlands Society 14(2): 303-315. (in Korean with English summary)
  34. http://map.daum.net
  35. http://kras.chungnam.go.kr
  36. http://map.naver.com

Cited by

  1. 습지보호지역을 대상으로 한 문화서비스 평가 연구 vol.22, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2019.22.6.139