Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an Integrated Evaluation Method for National Protected Areas Based on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11

아이치 생물다양성 목표 11에 기초한 국가 보호지역의 통합 평가 체계 개발

  • Received : 2018.01.22
  • Accepted : 2018.02.26
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study presents an integrated evaluation method to assess the level of achievement of quantitative expansion goals and qualitative improvement goals based on the Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 for quantitatively expanding and qualitatively improving national protected areas. The quantitative evaluation indicators for national protected areas are the percentage of terrestrial and inland water areas protected and the percentage of marine and coastal areas protected. The quantitative evaluation indicators for national protected areas are selected as 6 indicators: 1) ecologically important areas, 2) ecological representativeness, 3) management effectiveness, 4) connectivity, 5) social equity and 6) integration. Ecologically important areas are an indicator which evaluates how many areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services are included in national protected areas. Ecological representativeness is to assess how well national protected areas represent the ecosystem. Management effectiveness is an indicator which evaluates how effectively national protected areas are conserved and managed, and connectivity is an indicator to assess how well national protected areas are connected. Social equity is evaluating how equitably national protected areas are managed and the integration is assessing how much national protected areas are integrated into the wilder landscape and seascape. This study is significant in that it provides a perspective of qualitative improvement as well as quantitative expansion of national protected areas for biodiversity conservation through accurately understanding Aichi Biodiversity Target 11.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn YJ․Lee DK․Kim HG and Mo YW. 2014. Applying Connectivity Analysis for Prioritizing Unexecuted Urban Parks in Sungnam. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(3): 75-86. (in Korean with English summary)
  2. Bertzky B.․C . Corrigan․J. Kemsey․S. Kenney․C. Ravilious․C. Besancon and N. Burgess. 2012. Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland and UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK. pp. 25.
  3. Butchart, S. H.․J. P. Scharlemann․M. I. Evans ․S. Quader․S. Arico․J. Arinaitwe and T. M. Boucher. 2012. Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PloS one 7(3): e32529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032529
  4. Forman, R. T. T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York, USA: John wiley & Sons. pp. 420.
  5. Gray, C. L.․S. L. L. Hill․T. Newbold․L. N. Hudson․L. Borger․S. Contu․A. J. Hoskins․ S. Ferrier․A. Purvis and J. P. W. Scharlemann. 2016. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat Commun 7: 12306. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306
  6. Heo HY․Cho DG․Shim YJ . Ryu YJ . Hong JP and Shim GW. 2017. A Study on the Expanding Protected Areas through Identifying Potential Protected Areas. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 31(6): 586-594. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.6.586
  7. Hong JP․Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017a. A Study on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(5): 43-58. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Hong JP․Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017b. Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Expanding National Protected Areas. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(6): 79-91. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Jonas, H. and S. Lucas. 2012. Legal preparedness for achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, IDLO: Rome, Italy. pp. 5-8.
  10. Juffe-Bignoli, D.․N. D. Burgess․H. Bingham․ E. M. S. Belle․M.G. De Lima․M. Deguignet․B. Bertzky․A. N. Milam․J. Martinez-Lopez․E. Lewis․A. Eassom․S. Wicander․J. Geldmann․A. Van Soesbergen․ A. P. Arnell․B. O'Connor․S. Park․ Y. N. Shi․F. S. Danks․B. MacSharry and N. Kingston. 2014. Protected Planet Report 2014. UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK.
  11. Laurance, W. F. 2012. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489(7415): 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11318
  12. Lee DW. 2001. Landscape Ecology-Space Physiology for Environmental Planning, Design and Management. Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University Press. pp. 141-145, 240- 241. (in Korean)
  13. Lee SJ․Lee HW․Kim CK, Hong HJ․Kim SY․Kang KR and Kim BH. 2015. Strategy and Measures to Enlarge the Protected Area in Korea. Research report to Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. Lester, S. E.․B. S. Halpern․K. Grorud-Colvert ․J. Lubchenco․B. I. Ruttenberg․S. D. Gaines and R. R. Warner. 2009. Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 384: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08029
  15. McDermott, M.․S. Mahanty and K. Schreckenberg. 2013. Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy 33: 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
  16. Oh KS․Lee DW․Jung SH and Park CS. 2009. A Spatial Decision Support System for Establishing Urban Ecological Network: Based on the Landscape Ecology Theory. The Journal of GIS Association of Korea 17(3): 251-259. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Oh WS․Andy S. Choi․Kwon HS․Lee YK․ Jung PM․Shin JS․Jeon SH․Bang EJ․ Kim BR․Lee TH․Kim JI․Park HJ․ Song HR․Kim JM and Choe JC. 2015. National ecosystem assessment for the sustainable land management. Research report to National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean)
  18. Oldekop, J. A.․G. Holmes․W. E. Harris and K. L. Evans. 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology 30(1): 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568
  19. Olson, D. M.․E. Dinerstein․E. D. Wikramanayake․ N. D. Burgess․G. V. N. Powell․ E. C. Underwood and C. J. Loucks. 2001. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51(11): 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
  20. Pascual, U.․J. Phelps․E. Garmendia․K. Brown․E. Corbera․A. Martin and R. Muradian. 2014. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. BioScience 64(11): 1027-1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146
  21. Rodrigues, A. S.․S. J. Andelman․M. I. Bakarr ․L. Boitani․T. M. Brooks․R. M. Cowling and J. S. Long. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428(6983): 640-643. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422
  22. Song WK․Kim EY and Lee DK. 2012. Measuring Connectivity in Heterogenous Landscapes: a Review and Application. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 21 (3): 391-407. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2012.21.3.391
  23. Spalding, M. D.․H. E. Fox․G. R. Allen․N. Davidson․Z. A. Ferdana․M. A. X. Fin- layson and K. D. Martin. 2007. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 57(7): 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570707
  24. Spalding M. D.․V. N. Agostini․J. Rice and S. M. Grant. 2012. Pelagic provinces of the world: a biogeographic classification of the world's surface pelagic waters. Ocean and Coastal Management 60: 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.12.016
  25. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2016. Protected Planet Report 2016. UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK. and IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. pp. 7, 30, 40.
  26. Venter, O.․R. A. Fuller․D. B. Segan․J. Carwardine․T. Brooks․S. H. Butchart and H. P. Possingham. 2014. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biology 12(6): e1001891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891
  27. http://www.biodiversitya-z.org/content/centresof- plant-diversity-cpd
  28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centres_of_ Plant_Diversity://www.molit.go.kr