Fig 1. Schematic of the experimental apparatus.
Fig. 3. The variation of geometry of the discharge electrode for the comparison of the particle removal efficiency.
Fig. 4. The results of the experiment of the particle removal efficiency by the variation of flow velocity. (a) average oil particle size distribution of upstream, (b) V-I characteristics, (c) mass concentration and particle removal efficiency of the downstream by the variation of the applied voltage, and (d) the comparison of the particle removal efficiency by the particle size.
Fig. 5. The results of the experiment of the particle removal efficiency by the variation of the gap between the collection plates. (a) V-I characteristics, and particle removal efficiency (b) by power/flow rate, (c) by electric field strength.
Fig. 6. The results of the experiment of the particle removal efficiency by the variation of horizontal distance between spiked edges. (a) V-I characteristics, and particle removal efficiency (b) by the variation of horizontal distance between spiked edges, (c) by the particle size.
Fig. 7. The results of the experiment of the particle removal efficiency by the variation of vertical distance between spiked edges. (a) V-I characteristics, and particle removal efficiency (b) by the variation of vertical distance between spiked edges, (c) by the particle size.
Fig. 8. The results of the experiment of the particle removal efficiency by the variation of height of the discharge pin support. (a) V-I characteristics, and particle removal efficiency (b) by the variation of height of the discharge pin support, (c) by the particle size.
Fig, 2. The basic form of the discharge electrode.
References
- Azzopardi, B.J., Hughes, J.P., James, P.W., and Wang, W. (2003). The role of drainage channels in the performance of wave-plate mist eliminators, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 81, 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603322150499
- Banitabaei, S.A., Rafee, R., and Rahimzadaeh. H. (2012). Determination of minimum pressure drop at different plate spacings and air velocity in a wave-plate mist eliminator, Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 7, 590-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.611
- Castanas, E., and Kampa, M. (2008). Human health effects of air pollution, Journal of Environmental Pollution, 151, 362-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
- Cho, M.H., Fang, G.C., Huang, C.Y., Tsai, K.H., Xiao, Y.F., and Zhuang, Y.J. (2018). Review of total suspended particles (TSP) and PM2.5 concentration variations in Asia during the years of 1998-2015, Journal of Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 40(3), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9992-8
- Choi, W., and Kim, J.J. (2018). Characteristics of Ultrafine Particles in Urban Areas Observed Worldwide and in Korea: Sources and Emissions, Spatial and Temporal Distributions, and Health Effects, Atmosphere, 28(3), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.14191/ATMOS.2018.28.3.337
- Czech, T., Jaworek, A., Krupa, A., Marchewicz, A., and Sobczyk, A.T. (2018). Two-stage electrostatic precipitators for the reduction of PM2.5 particle emission, Journal of Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 67, 206-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.03.003
- Guerra, V.G., and Oliveira, A.E. (2018). Influence of particle concentration and residence time on the efficiency of nanoparticulate collection by electrostatic precipitation, Journal of Electrostatics, 96, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2018.08.006
- Hamedi Estakhrsar, M.H., and Rafee, R. (2016). Effects of wavelength and number of bends on the performance of zigzag demisters with drainage channels, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, 685-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.08.023
- James, P.W., and Wang, Y. (1998). The calculation of wave-plate demister efficiencies using numerical simulation of the flow field and droplet motion, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 76(8), 980-985. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387698525630
- Jiang, J., Liu, Y., Xu, M., Yao, H., Yu, D., and Yu, X. (2017). Experimental and numerical evaluation of the performance of a novel compound demister, Desalination, 409, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.022
- Jo, Y.M., and Park, H. (2013). Regulation Standard of Fine Particles and Control Techniques of Emission Sources, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 29(4), 486-503. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.4.486
- Kulasekharan, N., Iniyan, S., and Venkatesan, G. (2013). Influence of turbulence models on the performance prediction of flow through curved vane demisters, Desalination, 329, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.001
- Melaaen, M.C., and JOsang, A.I. (2002). Fluid flow simulations of a vane separator, Modeling, Identification and Control, 23(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.2002.1.1
- Mizuno, A. (2000). Electrostatic precipitation, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 7(5), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1109/94.879357
- Yuan, S., Fan, Y., and Lin, H. (2016). Influence of Discrete Particle Diameter and Separating Velocity on the Separation Efficiency of Wave-Plate separator Including Coalescence and Breakup Model, Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 37, 1324-1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2015.1092876