Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Change of Spatial Structures of Shared Space at Urban Campuses - The opposite concept of Gridlock upon the change to shared campuses -

도심 캠퍼스 공유공간의 공간 구조 변화에 대한 연구 - 그리드락의 반대 개념으로서의 공유 캠퍼스로의 변화에 대하여 -

  • 강은기 (서울대학교 대학원) ;
  • 백진 (서울대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.27
  • Accepted : 2018.11.09
  • Published : 2018.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Urban campus, one of the main urban facilities, is the representative place that is struggling with 'gridlock'. Due to privatization of space among different departments and space shortages, gridlock has been occurring as a result. The urban campus trying to solve this problem by changing the quality of space, especially the structure of the shared space, which is expected to be the solution to the grid lock problem. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the structural change in the university's shared space based on paradigm transition. The theoretical consideration is to analyze the spatial characteristics of university shared space that appear at different stages through a new perspective that compares the gridlock phenomenon and the shared paradigm. The framework of the analysis of the shared space, which has recently been restructured, is classified into the spatial characteristics of collaborative space, the creative space, and the common/complex space. In addition, these spatial characteristics are again analyzed through the division of legislative facility classification, management governance subject, area, building location and layout, exposure to the outside as well as the analysis of student and staff entry and exit, sharing structure of site and space, and the classification of program characteristics. The results are as follows: The restructured space is systemized so that the management governance of each space would be connected to each other to share information and space. Furthermore, the spatial boundary between colleges or between campus spaces are not only physically, but categorically clear. The restructured space has semi (or in-between)-spatial characteristics such as the intersection in inside and outside of the pedestrian's circulation and the mixture of programs. This study could serve as principal references in presenting the systematic analysis of directions of the shared spatial structure for the urban campus where new educational space is required due to the changes in the university system.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 서울대학교 건설환경종합연구소

References

  1. Allen, T. (1971). Communication network in R &D Laboratories, Management 1.
  2. Cho, H., & Lim, H. (2012). A Study on the Payment for the Space Charging System of University Facilities, Journal of Korea facility management association, 7(2), 5-12.
  3. Choi, S., Kim, J., Ban, S., Lee, G., Lee, S., & Choi, H. (2011). Future Strategies of Education for Cultivating Creative Talents in the 21st Century, Korean Educational Development Institute, RR 2011-01.
  4. Han, G., Lee, H., & Kim, H. (2005). The Changing Boundary of University Campus A Case Study of the University California at Berkeley, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 2(19)
  5. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  6. Heller. M. (2008). The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives, Basic Books.
  7. Jang, Y., & Kang, S. (2016). A Study on the Theory and Implementing Measures of Sharing City, Gyeonggi Research Institute, 1-127.
  8. Kerr, C. (1995). The Idea of a Multiversity, Harvard University Press.
  9. Ko, G. (2006) [Projects] Hana Square of the Korea University, Architecture and Culture , 307.
  10. Kim, C. (2012). Study on the operational proposals of space chargeback in university campus, Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 14(4), 85-96.
  11. Kim, C., & Park, D. (2009). [Construction Record] EWHA CAMPUS COMPLEX. The Korea Institute of Building Construction, 9(2)
  12. Kim, E., Cha, M., Kim, S., & Park, M. (2015). A Study of Enhancing Urban Space Utilization based on the Sharing Economy, KRIHS.
  13. Kim, Y. (2017). Fablab and Fabcity, Korean Studies information.
  14. Lee, H. (2008). Study on Development of Evaluation Indicators for Effective Utilization of University Facility Space, Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST).
  15. Lee, H., Cho, C., Ryu, S., Kim, T., Ryu, C., & Seo, B. (2014). A Survey Study on Space Use and Management at National University, Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 21(3).
  16. Lee, J. (2004). [Special Report] Ewha Campus Center Invited International Design Competition, Architecture and Culture , 274.
  17. Ryu C. (2015). Let's play, Share!(Shared city and Future of Seoul), The Seoul Institute.
  18. Pantin, W. A. (1962-63). Medieval English town-house plans. Medieval Archaeology.
  19. Perrault, D. (2008-06). [real PROJECT] EWHA CAMPUS COMPLEX. Architecture and Culture , 325.
  20. Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society, Minumsa.
  21. Seoul National University. (2004). Asset management system BPR report, Seoul.
  22. Seoul National University. (2012). Standard for facility management, Seoul.
  23. Seoul National University. (2017). A Study on the Improvement of Space Utilization of Gwanak Campus through Concept of Shared Space ,Seoul.
  24. Seoul National University ProCEED Idea Factory Hompage https://ideafactory.snu.ac.kr
  25. Son, E. (2012). Shared space and community, East Asia Cultural studies Institute, 32, 61-79.
  26. Shin, J., Park, Y., Ryu, H., Chio, B., & Ryu, U. (2009). University Facilities: University Administration n0.7, Seoul, Hagjisa.
  27. Takahashi, R. (2009). Research Cooperative Research Campus Regional Collaboration for the Conservation and Utilization of Lands, Architectural Institute of Japan Architectural Studies.
  28. University Research institute. (2000). What is a university in transition era, Seoul, Hangilsa.
  29. Yang, S. (2013). The Economy of Sharing the Space has, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 57(11), 75-98.