융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회적 자본과 노인 삶의 만족도 연구

A Study on Social Capital and Satisfaction of Elderly life

  • 이창화 (경복대학교 복지행정학과)
  • Lee, Changhwa (Department of Welfare & Public Administration, Kyungbok University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.12
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 노인인구의 증가와 더불어 노인 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 서로 다른 사회적 자원과 규범, 가치, 신뢰 등의 차이를 조사하였다. 조사대상 노인은 N시에 거주하는 65세 이상 노인 가구(401가구)를 대상으로 조사를 실시하였다. 분석결과 인구사회학적 변수에 따른 삶의 만족도 차이비교에 있어서 성별, 결혼여부, 학력, 가구구성형태, 수입정도에 따른 삶의 만족도 차이는 있는 것으로 보여졌으며 노인의 삶의 만족도에 있어서 사회적 자본의 영향력을 살펴본 결과 신뢰. 규범, 참여 순으로 기여하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 노인복지정책의 내용 및 방향에 있어서 사회적 자본을 활성화 할 수 있는 다양한 노인사회활동 참여를 중심으로 하는 정책이 우선적으로 고려되어야 함을 시사한다.

This paper investigates the differences in norms, values, and trusts that affect the quality of life of the elderly, as well as the elderly population. The elderly surveyed 401 households (65 years old or older) residing in N city. As a result of the analysis, there was a difference in life satisfaction according to sex, marital status, educational background, type of household composition and income level in the comparison of life satisfaction according to demographic variables. As a result of examining the influence of social capital on the elderly's life satisfaction, it was found that they contributed to trust, norm, and participation order. This study suggests that future policies of the elderly welfare policy should be considered as a policy that focuses on participation in various social activities that can activate social capital.

키워드

Table 1. Definition of Social Capital

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Characteristics of Major Variables

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Factor analysis about social capial and coheison

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Analysis of the difference of social capital according to demographic characteristics

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Analysis of the difference of life satisfaction according to demographic characteristics

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Analysis of the difference of life satisfaction according to demographic characteristics

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. regression about quality of life with elderly

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_287_t0007.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Statistical Office.(2018). http://kostat.go.kr
  2. J. Y. Jang. (2013). Working poverty and Income support for low-income brackets. Korean social Trends 2013, 135-140.
  3. J. H. Kim. (2015). Aging and Change in the Life of the Elderly. Korean social Trends 2015, 43-51.
  4. W. J Tae. (12-05-2017). Han life expectancy 82.4 years, health life 64.9 years ... 17.5 years live as 'patient'. http://news.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0011955837
  5. B. J. Yoon. (2018). A Study on the Happy Life Expectancy by Life Table Method. J Health Info Stat 2018, 43(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2018.43.1.89
  6. R. A. Easterlin. (2005). Feeding the Illusion of Growth and Happiness: A Reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6170-z
  7. OECD. (2017). Multilingual Summaries How's Life? 2017 Measuring Well-being. OECD Publishing. DOI : 10.1787/2308967
  8. SDSN. (2017). World Happiness Report 2017. http://unsdsn.org/resources/publications/world-happiness-report-2017/
  9. S. J. Sim, H. G. Lee & J. Y. Seok. (2015). Subjective Wellness Measurement Results: Analysis of subjective well-being distribution and determinants. Statistical Research. 19-72.
  10. H. B. Park & H. C. Lee. (2005). Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Satisfaction in Life: Economic and Social Factors?. Journal of Korean Public Administration, 17(3), 709-728.
  11. H. B. Park. & H. C. Lee. (2004). Social Capital and Gender Equality : The Effect of Gender Characteristics and Gender Equality on Social Capital. Korea Journal of Science and Technology Policy Institute. 91-116.
  12. Y. R. Hong. (2002). The Meanings and Functions of Social Capital in National Human Resource Developement Policy for Social Cohesion. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 4(1), 23-47.
  13. J. K. So. (2004). Toward Developing Social Capital. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 16(1).
  14. Y. C. Choi. (2004). Constructing the Social Capital Indicators at Local Level. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 119-144.
  15. D. Narayan. & M. F. Cassidy. (2001). A Dimensional Approach to Measuring Social Capital Inventory. Current Sociology, 49(2), 59-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049002006
  16. S. M. Kim. (2011). The influence of the social capital on thesuicide ideation in the elderly. Graduate School. Yonsei University. Seoul. Korea.
  17. Y. S. Jang, H. J. Jang & M. S. Cho. (2009). Social Capital and Social Conflicts in Korea: The Multiple Facets of Social Capital. Survey Research, 10(2), 45-69.
  18. J. S. Choi, Y. S. Kang & J. W. Kim. (2009). The effect of the social exclusion Level against. Yonsei social welfare review, 309-341.
  19. Y. S. Jang, M. S. Cho, H. J. Chung & M. E. Jeong. (2012). A New Approach to Social Integration: Causes