DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Monitoring the Oriental Fruit Fly (Bactrocera dorsalis), the Melon Fly (B. cucurbitae), and B. tau Fruit Fly Using Wax Formation Lures

왁스 제형을 이용한 오리엔탈과실파리(Bactrocera dorsalis, 오이과실파리(B. cucurbitae) 및 B. tau 과실파리에 대한 모니터링 기술

  • Kim, Yonggyun (Department of Plant Medicals, Andong National University) ;
  • Imam, Mollah (Department of Plant Medicals, Andong National University) ;
  • Al Baki, Md. Abdullah (Department of Plant Medicals, Andong National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jeong Joon (Research Institute of Climate Change and Agriculture, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2017.10.13
  • Accepted : 2017.11.15
  • Published : 2018.03.01

Abstract

Out of 60 quarantine insect pests in Korea, 42 species are classified into tephritid fruit flies. Most of these fruit flies are attracted to two natural products, methyl eugenol (ME) or raspberry ketone. Paraffin wax has been devised to formulate these lures. The formulated lures were applied to field test in Taiwan to attract quarantine fruit flies. Wax-ME formulation was installed in Delta trap and could attract 60-80 males of B. dorsalis per day during late August, while a wax formulation of Cue-lure (a methylated compound of raspberry ketone) attracted both B. cucurbitae and B. tau. These wax formulations can be applied to monitor these three quarantine species in Korea.

과실파리류는 국내 60종의 검역 해충 가운데 42종을 차지하고 있다. 이들 대부분은 자연계 산물인 methyl eugenol (ME) 또는 raspberry ketone에 특이적으로 유인된다. 이들 유인물질을 파라핀 왁스를 이용하여 제형화하였고, 이를 대만에서 야외 유인 효과를 검증하였다. 이들 왁스제형은 모두 델타트랩에 설치하고 8월 말경에 모니터링 한 결과 ME 왁스 제형은 오리엔탈과실파리(Bactrocera dorsalis)를 매일 60-80 마리 포획하였다. 반면에 Cuelure 왁스제형은 오이과실파리(Bactrocera cucurbitae)와 B. tau를 유인하였다. 이러한 결과는 본 왁스제형이 이들 검역 해충에 대한 국내 모니터링에 응용될 수 있다는 것을 제시하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al Baki, A., Keum, E., Kim, H., Song, Y., Kim, Y., Kwon, G., Park, Y., 2017. Age grading and gene flow of overwintered Bactrocera scutellata populations. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 20, 1402-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.10.008
  2. Chen, Y.H., Liu, L.Y., Tsai, W.H., Haymer, D.S., Lu, K.H., 2014. Using DNA chips for identification of tephritid pest species. Pest Manag. Sci. 70, 1254-1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3687
  3. Drew, R.A.I., Hancock, D.L., 2000. Phylogeny of the Tribe Dacini (Dacinae) based on morphological, distributional, and biological data, in: Aluja, M., Norrbom A.L. (Eds.), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 491-504.
  4. Kim, K., Kim, M., Kwon, G., Kim, Y., 2017b. Technologies required for development of trap-based MAT control against the striped fruit fly, Bactrocera scutellata. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 56, 51-60.
  5. Kim, Y., Kim, D., 2016. Integrated pest management against Bactrocera fruit flies. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 55, 359-376.
  6. Kim, Y., Kim, M., Kim, K., Vatanparast, M., Kim, Y., Kwon, G., 2017a. Formulation of wax type dispenser monitoring the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, and its molecular diagnostic technology. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 56, 289-294. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2017.06.0.004
  7. Vargas, R.I., Pinero, J.C., Leblanc L., 2015. An overview of pest species of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the integration of biopesticides with other biological approaches for their management with a focus on the Pacific region. Insects 6, 297-318. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6020297
  8. White, I.M., Elson-Harris, M.M., 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CABI International, Wallingford, UK.