Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the General Application of the New Urbanism Zoning Code in the Established City - Focused on the Miami21 in the United States -

뉴어버니즘형 조닝의 기성시가지 내 전면적용에 관한 연구 - 마이애미21을 대상으로 -

  • Lee, Bo-Ram (Urban Research Center, Seoul Housing & Communities Corporation)
  • 이보람 (서울주택도시공사 도시연구원)
  • Received : 2017.05.05
  • Accepted : 2017.10.16
  • Published : 2017.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The sprawl by modernization has worsened the neighborhood, with the consequence that there is no more sense of community. To overcome this, New urbanism has begun and it enters from its infancy a phase of coming into wide use as the urban planning system. On top of that, a new zoning system called 'Smartcode' was drawn up lately. The purposes of this study are to elucidate the contents and to prove the application process of Smartcode. The case study is city of Miami which firstly applied Smartcode throughout the city. Applying the code shows its three main plausible features: 1) progress verification of Smartcode by the attempt of the Miami's own, 2) confirm four things which are superb than the conventional one by comparing focusing the technical skills, 3) creative approaches to convince residents about the code during the process of charrette. Consequently, it would be said that Smartcode verified its potentials as a general tool.

Keywords

References

  1. Borys, H., Talen, E. & Lambert, M. (2017). Form-Based Codes? You're not alone, Retrieved September 1, 2017 from http://www.placemakers.com/how-we-teach/codes-study
  2. Brown, B. B. & Werner, C. M. (2009). Before and after a new light rail stop, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.75(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802458013
  3. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis, Princeton Architectural Press.
  4. Cullingworth, J. B. & Caves, R. (2009). Planning in the USA: Policies, issues, and processes, Routledge, 218.
  5. Dover, V. (2007). Charrettes for New urbanism. Retrieved April.20, 2017 from https://www.doverkohl.com/s/charrettes _for_NU_in_F-ncxh.pdf.
  6. Garde, A. (2006). Designing and developing new urbanist projects in the United States: Insights and implications, Journal of Urban Design Vol.11(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500490299
  7. Gordon, D. & Vipond, S. (2005). Gross density and new urbanism, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.71(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976404
  8. Handy, S., Sallis, J. F., Weber, D., Maibach, E. & Hollander, M. (2008). Is support for traditionally designed communities growing?, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.74(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802010418
  9. Jung, H. Y., Im, H. J. & Ahn, N. Y.(2013). Searching for alternative zoning systems for built-up areas in Seoul, The Seoul Institute, 2013-BR-12.
  10. Kim, H. S. (2008). A critical review on 'the new type of urban development and management'and the search for the alternative approach, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, Vol.9(1), 77-100.
  11. Kim, J. S. (2007). Perceiving and valuing sense of community in a new urbanist development : A case study of Kentlands, Journal of Urban Design, Vol.12(2), 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701306286
  12. Lee, J. H. & Jo, S. Y. (2011). A study on the FBCs as a regulating method for urban design, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, Vol.12(3), 177-90.
  13. Lim, Y. K. & Jin, H. Y. (2011). Improving building form regulations, AURI 2011-6.
  14. Matsui, A., Kurihara, Y., Lee, B. R. & Takamizawa, M. (2009). A Study on a trend of systematization on New urbanism, Proceedings of Housing Studies Symposium, Architectural Institute of Japan, Vol.4, 137-144.
  15. MIAMI21code vol.I. (2016). City of Miami Planning Department.
  16. Niijima, A. & Nishiyama, N. (2000). A study on the new urbanism in comtemporary American city planning, City planning review, Special issue, vol.35, 43-48.
  17. Oh, S. H. & Tchah, C. Y. (2011). How the Korean urban design practice adopted the western urban design theories, AURI 2011-2.
  18. Park, Y. C. & Ryu, J. S. (2000). Proposed and limitations of urban design prototypes in new urbanism, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.16(5), 77-86.
  19. Rodriguez, D. A., Khattak, A. J. & Evenson, K. R. (2006). Can new urbanism encourage physical activity?, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.72(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976723
  20. Steuteville, R., Langdon, P. & Special Contributors. (2009). New urbanism best practices guide 4th Edition, new urban publications, 216.
  21. Suarez, Y. (2005), Residential Development in Miami Continues to Grow, Miami Today, Retrieved May1, 2017 from http://www.miami21.org/Media_050414.asp
  22. Talen, E. (1999). Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism, Urban Studies, Vol.36(8), 1361-1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993033
  23. Wakamura, K. & Kocado, H. (1995). Sustainable communities, Gakugeipub.
  24. Yang, Y. (2008). A tale of two cities:: Physical form and Neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.74(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802215546