한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제37권5호
  • /
  • Pages.825-833
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

STEAM R&E를 통한 고등학생의 창의적 인재 역량 변화

Changes in High School Students' Creative Leader Competency through STEAM R&E

  • 투고 : 2017.07.24
  • 심사 : 2017.09.27
  • 발행 : 2017.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라 교육부는 미래 과학기술 발전을 주도할 창의적이고 융합적 역량을 갖춘 인재 융성을 강조하고 있다. 융합인재교육(STEAM)은 학생들의 과학기술에 대한 흥미와 이해를 높이고 창의적 문제해결능력을 배양하는 데에 목적이 있다. STEAM R&E는 실생활과 관련된 융합 문제를 해결하기 위해 학생이 자기 주도적으로 연구 설계를 함으로써 미래 인재 역량을 함양하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 본 연구에서는 STEAM R&E 프로젝트를 수행한 뒤 고등학생의 창의적 인재 역량이 변화하였는지를 탐색하였다. 창의적 인재 역량 검사는 인지적, 정의적, 사회적 영역으로 구성되며, 검사지는 각 영역별로 해당 요소를 측정하는 리커트 스케일 문항으로 측정하였다. 이에 2016 STEAM R&E에 참여한 고등학생을 대상으로 사전-사후 창의적 인재 역량 변화를 정량적으로 살펴보았고, 과학고등학교와 영재학교, 과학중점학교, 일반계 고등학교 간의 변화 차이를 비교해보았다. 연구 결과, STEAM R&E 프로젝트를 통해 전체 학생의 창의적 인재 역량이 세가지 영역 모두 향상하였음을 알 수 있었다. 과학고등학교와 영재학교 학생들은 사전-사후검사 결과에서 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았으나, 과학중점학교와 일반계 고등학교 학생의 창의적 인재 역량이 유의미하게 향상하였다. 연구 결과를 통해 STEAM R&E 활동이 일반고와 과학중점학교 학생들의 창의적 인재 역량의 함양이 효과를 나타낼 수 있는 것으로 볼 수 있었으며, 학생들의 창의적 인재 역량이 어떻게 성장할 수 있는지에 대한 질적 탐구가 후속연구로 진행되어야 함을 제언하였다.

The Korean Ministry of Education has emphasized human resource development with creative and convergent ability for future science and technology development. Korean STEAM Education aims to enhance students' interest and their understanding of science and technology as well as to develop students' creative problem-solving skills. Through STEAM R&E project, students experience self-directed research in order to solve the problem in the context of everyday life. In this study, we aim to find out whether the creative leader competency of high school students changed after they experienced the STEAM R&E project. The creative leader competency consisted of three domains: cognitive, affective, and societal domain. We measured the creative leader competency using the questionnaire scales. The questionnaire was administered to 612 high school students who participated in the 2016 STEAM R&E project. Pre- and post- test scores were collected, and we analyzed it. We compared the mean difference between pre- and post- test scores as well as the mean differences among science high school, gifted school, science core school, and general high school. From the result, we found that all student' creative leader competency improved after participating in the STEAM R&E project in all three domains. The result also showed that students' test scores of science high school and gifted school showed no significant mean differences, while student's scores of both science core school and general high school improved significantly. From the results, we concluded that STEAM R&E activities could be an effective tool in cultivating creative leader competency, especially for general high school students and science core school students. We also suggested that further researches are needed to find how we could enhance students' creative leader competency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cheong, Y., Kim, E., Jung, M., & Lee, J. (2014). Development of a question list in accordance with stage of research, which guides open inquiry of gifted students in science. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.1.63
  2. Chi, E. & Ju, U. (2012). Exploring the construct and developing the scale for the measurement of creative leader competency. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(1), 69-94.
  3. Cho, Y. (2011). The direction of teaching and learning for creative leader cultivation. In Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (Ed.) Forum on the Direction of Secondary School Education for Fostering Creative Leadership: How should secondary school education change to foster creative leadership?(ORM 2011-17). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation:
  4. Choe, H. & Tae, J. (2015).The meaning and value of R&E(Research and Education) experiences of science specialized high schools: gathering voices of graduates by individual interview. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented 14(3), 51-79.
  5. Choi, H., Kang, H., Seo, H., Park, I., Lee, H., Lee, J., Park, K., & Park, J. (2003). Development of research & education program for the enhancement of creativity (Korean Foundation of Advanced Creativity (Korea Science and Engineering Foundation Report 2002-5092).
  6. Choi, S., Kim, J., Ban, S., Lee, K., Lee, S., & Choi, H. (2011). Future strategies for educating creative talents in the 21st century(Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Report RR2011-01)
  7. Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in Education and Learning. London: Kogan Page.
  8. Gu, M. Kim, J., Park, C., Kim, Y., & Seo, Y. (2011). Analyzing the creative process of the pauling's research for science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(1), 63-80.
  9. Han, K., Chun, M., Mah, J., & Shin, Y. (2009). An analysis of adaptability for the self-designed concentration and independent study, 3(2), 101-121.
  10. Han, W., Kang, Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Problem-finding and problem-solving processes under ill-structured scientific problem situation for high school students. Teacher Education Research, 52(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.52.2.201308.195
  11. Houseal, A. K., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student-teacher-scientist partnership on students' and teachers' content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 84-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21126
  12. Hwang, Y. (2015). Development of strategies for education about research design to student researchers in science and engineering through extraction of problem specification elements (Doctoral dissertation). Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  13. Johnson, S. K. & Johnson, K (1986). Independent study program. Waco, TX. Purfrock Press.
  14. Jung, H., Chae, Y., & Ryu, C. (2012). Study on Research and Education (R&E) programs in science high schools and science academies: focusing on the differences of perceptions between students and mentors. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(7), 1139-1156. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1139
  15. Jung, H., Ryu, C., & Chae, Y. (2012). Research and Education (R&E) programs in the science high schools and gifted high schools: based on the interview results with the R&E coordinators. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(2), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.243
  16. Kim, S. (2011). Direction of evaluation of education for creative leader upbringing. In Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (Ed.) Forum on the Direction of Secondary School Education for Fostering Creative Leadership: How should secondary school education change to foster creative leadership?(ORM 2011-17). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  17. Kim, Y. (2017, July 12). Science high school and gifted school students, they fallen behind with the general high school students in the third grade of college. Article of chosun.com. Retrieved from http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/07/12/2017071200311.html
  18. Kim, W., Kim, Y., Seo, H., & Park, J. (2013). Thomas Young's problem solving through analogical reasoning in the process of light inference theory formation and its implications for scientific creativity education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(5), 817-833. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.5.817
  19. Kim, S., Mun, K., Hwang, Y., Mun, J., Gao, L., & Cho, M. (2016). Report about 2016 STEAM R&E Support and Research Team(2-2016-0862-001-1). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  20. Kim, J., Na, J., & Song, J. (2017). Exploring the possibility of forming the strategic community of practice for science education: a case of science core schools in Korea. Journal of Korean Science Education Association, 37(1), 169-179.
  21. Kim, Y., Seo, H., & Park, J. (2013). An analysis on problem-finding patterns of well-known creative scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1285-1299. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1285
  22. Kwak, Y. (2011). The concept of creative leader to be taught through school education. In Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (Ed.) Forum on the Direction of Secondary School Education for Fostering Creative Leadership: How should secondary school education change to foster creative leadership?(ORM 2011-17). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
  23. Lee, K., Cho, N., Oh, E., Kwan, J., Kim, H., Chi, E., & Hong, W. (2011). A study on the improvement of secondary school education for cultivating students' creativity (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Report RRC 2011-2).
  24. Lee, K., Choi, Y., Hwang, S. (2011). Development of creative problem solving program based on team project. Korean Society for Creativity Education, 11(2), 141-160.
  25. Lee, M. & Kim, H. (2016). Science high school students' shift in scientific practice and perception through the R&E participation: on the perspective of legitimate peripheral participation in the community of practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(3), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0371
  26. Lim, J. (2004). A Study on applicability of blended learning strategy in K-12 school setting. Korean journal of educational research, 42(2), 399-431.
  27. Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022564507639
  28. Mun, J. (2015). Characteristics of the scientific imagination in scientists' inquiry process (Doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  29. Park, J., Yoon, J., Kang, S. (2014). The development on core competency model of scientist and its verification for competency-based science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 509-541. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.509
  30. Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: How-to-guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  31. Seo, H., Jung, H., Son, J., Choi, K., Ha, B., Park, J. Sung, Y. (2006). Directions for establishment of a science academy in Gyeonggi-Do (Gyeonggi Research Institute Report).
  32. Seo, J., Han, S., Kim, H., & Jeong, J. (2012). Science high school students' analysis of characteristics on ill-structured problem-solving process. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(1), 8-19.
  33. Shin, N., Jonassen, D., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10058
  34. Sun, K. (2014). A study on the effects of teachers' feedback and methods of performance assessment on Korean writing skills and creative leader competency (Doctoral dissertation). Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  35. Yu. Y., Kang Y., & Kim, J. (2013). The relationships among scientific creativity and general creativity, meta-cognition, and affective characteristics. Study of Curriculum and Instruction, 17(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.1.109