Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recent Ecological Asset Research Trends using Keyword Network Analysis

키워드 네트워크 분석을 활용한 생태자산 연구 경향 분석

  • Kim, Byeori (Bureau of Ecological Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Hyuck (Bureau of Ecological Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuksoo (Bureau of Ecological Research, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 김벼리 (국립생태원 생태연구본부융합연구실) ;
  • 이재혁 (국립생태원 생태연구본부융합연구실) ;
  • 권혁수 (국립생태원 생태연구본부융합연구실)
  • Received : 2017.04.24
  • Accepted : 2017.09.22
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine domestic and foreign ecological asset research trends. We aimed to understand ecological assets research directions and trends by comprehensively analyzing 12 keywords, including those similar to keywords for comparable assets, to identify related fields and regions. Extensive analysis of domestic and foreign studies was conducted through keyword network analysis of textural information. This approach is helpful for understanding the flow of information and identifying research directions. Foreign studies based on sustainability were connected with 'Economic assessment', 'Management' and 'Policy' areas. It was difficult to determine domestic research trends because there are fewer domestic studies than foreign. There were studies that sought to identify economic value of developing regions. This research can be used to guide the research direction for future ecosystem asset analysis in Korea.

이 연구의 목적은 국내 외 생태자산 관련 연구 경향을 파악하는 것이다. 생태자산과 의미가 유사한 12개 키워드와 연관 있는 분야 및 영역들을 확인하면서 연구흐름을 이해하고자 하였다. 우리는 키워드 네트워크 분석을 이용하여 방대하게 이루어지고 있는 국내외 연구들을 분석하였다. 키워드 네트워크 분석은 정보의 구조적 흐름을 이해하고 방향성을 파악하는데 유용하다. 국외 연구들은 지속가능성을 중심으로 보전, 경제적 평가, 관리, 정책 분야로 연결되는 것을 보았다. 국내연구 분석은 문헌자료가 적어 다양한 흐름들을 확인하기 어려웠으나 지역의 활성화를 위해 경제적인 가치를 확인하고자 하는 연구들이 있었다. 이 연구는 향후 국내 생태자산 관련 연구 방향들에 설정하는데 활용할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agudo M., Rodriguez, D. 1993. A proposal for the establishment of the National Center for Phytogenetic Resource Conservation in the Venezuelan Republic. Science of the total environment. 139: 193-196.
  2. Ahn DS, Lee SY, Jeong NR. 2014. Planning on the Baekdudaegan Eco and Cultural Park. Journal of Recreation and Landscape. 8(3): 79-86. [Korean Literature]
  3. Ahn SE, Kim JA, Jeon DJ, Kwon YH, Noh BH. 2014. Development and Application of Integrated Measurement system to Assess Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Korea(1). Korea Environment Institute. p.105-237. [Korean Literature]
  4. Ahn HK, Kim YW. 2015. A Validity Test in the CVM Measurement of Economic value of Natural Resources-Focusing on the Case of Munjangdae Hot Spring Developmnent-. Korean Association for policy Sciences. 19(1): 35-57. [Korean Literature]
  5. Barbier EB. 2011. Transaction costs and the transition to environmentally sustainable development. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 1(1): 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.001
  6. Camargo-Ricalde SL, Dhillion SS. 2004. Use and management of Mimosa species in the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Valley, a tropical semiarid region in Mexico (Fabaceae- Mimosoideae). Revista de biologia tropical. 52(4): 845-851.
  7. Chen GQ, Chen ZM. 2010. Carbon emissions and resources use by Chinese economy 2007: a 135-sector inventory and input-output embodiment. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 15(11): 3647-3732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.12.024
  8. Choi YB. 2003. A Study on Alternatives for Tourism Vitalizations with a Consideration of Ecological Chracteristics in Jeju International Free City. 36: 97-110. [Korean Literature]
  9. Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the Global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmnetal Change. 26:152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  10. Elliff CI, Kikuchi RK. 2015. The ecosystem service approach and its application as a tool for integrated coastal management. Natureza & Conservacao. 13(2): 105-111. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.10.001
  11. Hampicke U. 1999. The limits to economic valuation of biodiversity. International journal of social economics. 26(1/2/3): 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229541
  12. Hayes MC, Peterson MN, Heinen-Kay JL, Langerhans RB. 2015. Tourism-related drivers of support for protection of fisheries resources on Andros Island, The Bahamas. Ocean & Coastal Management. 106: 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.007
  13. Hein L, Bagstad K, Edens B, Obst C, de Jong R, Lesschen JP. 2016. Defining ecosystem assets for natural capital accounting. PLoS One. 11(11): e0164460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164460
  14. Holt AR, Hattam C. 2009. Capitalizing on nature: how to implement an ecosystem approach. Biology letters. 5: 580-582. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0406
  15. Hosseini SM. 2003. The study on establishment possibility of non governmental organizations for conservation of environment and natural resources. Journal of Environmental Studies. 29(31): 105-114.
  16. Jeong KJ. 2012. A Study on Perception and us of Gotjawal in Jeju Island. The Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 22(2): 11-28. [Korean Literature]
  17. Jeong KJ. 2015. The Past, present and future of Gotjawal-Questions and proposals about the existence of Gotjawal. The Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 25(3): 15-32. [Korean Literature]
  18. Joh SH. 2008. Happiness Economics Approach to Anthropocentric-Nature Perspective and Ecocentric Nature Perspective. Journal of Environmental policy. 7(2): 49-66. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.7.2.200806.49
  19. Kho JH, Cho KT, Cho YH. 2013. A Study on Recent Research Trend in Management of technology using keywords network analysis. Korea Intelligent information system society. 19(2): 101-123. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.101
  20. Kim BS, Jeong MW, Jeon SE, Shin DB. 2015. Global Research Trends on Geospatial Information by Keyword Network Analysis. Journal of Korea spatial information society. 23(1): 69-77. [Korean Literature]
  21. Kwon YJ, Yoo SH Park SH. 2013. Assessment of the Environmental Value of the Geumriver Estuary. Journal of the Korean Society of marine environment&safety. 19(5): 417-429. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.5.417
  22. Langeweg F. 1998. The implementation of Agenda 21our common failure'?. Science of the total environment. 218(2): 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00210-1
  23. Lee HW, Kim CG, Hong HJ, Noh YH, Kang SI, Kim JH, Sin SC, Lee SJ, Kang JY. 2015. Development of Decision Supporting Framework to Enhance Natural Capital Sustainability: Focusing on Ecosystem Service Analysis. 3479-3651. [Korean Literature]
  24. Lee JH, Son YH. 2016. The recent research wave in ecotourism research using keyword network analysis. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning. 22(2): 45-55. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2016.22.2.045
  25. Lee WB, Min MS. 2008. Sustainable Planning for Enhancing the Local Competitiveness: A Case Study of Namhae Couny, Gyeongnam, Journal of Local Government Studies. 12(3): 289-302. [Korean Literature]
  26. Nam, JH, Kang, DS. 2016. Natural capital and ecosystem service of marine ecosystems : concepts and valuation methods. The Korean Society for Marine Environment and Energy. 5: 111. [Korean Literature]
  27. Park HC, Oh CH. 2014. Direction for imporving management model based on carrying capacity for managing natural resources in ecotourism area: Focused on Getz, LAC, VIM, and VERP. Journal of Environmental policy. 13(4): 107-133. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.13.4.201412.107
  28. Putra DD, Lelawati I. 2014. Finding Geothermal Energy based on Radioisotopes Technology. Energy Procedia. 47: 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.198
  29. Roy KC. 1998. Issues in resource conservation and sustainable development: Indian situation. International Journal of Social Economics. 25(1): pp.16-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299810194875
  30. Sakai K. 2015. From The "Old" To A "New" Construction Industry-Sustainability Design Of Structures. Special Publication. 305: 40.1-40.8.
  31. Seker DZ, Tanik A, Gurel M, Ekdal A, Erturk A, Kabdasli S, Aydingakko A. 2004. An overview of integrated and interdisciplinary studies on conservation of a coastal lagoon system in Turkey. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 15(4): 364-379 https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830410540117
  32. Smulders S, Toman M, Withagen C. 2014. Growth theory and 'green growth'. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 30(3): 423-446. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru027
  33. Tang L, Gao L, Shi L. 2015. Sustainable management and protection of ecosystems in Shangri-La County, Yunnan Provinc, China: Introduction. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 22(2): 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.943331
  34. Thondhlana G, Shackleton S. 2015. Cultural values of natural resources among the San people neighbouring Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, South Africa. Local Environment. 20(1): 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.818950
  35. Dicie I, Cryle P, Maskell L. 2014. UK Nation Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 1: Developing the evidence base for a Natural Capital Asset Check: What characteristics should we understand in order to improve environmental appraisal and natural income account? UNEP-WCMC. LWEC. UK
  36. Veeman TS, Politylo J. 2003. The role of institutions and policy in enhancing sustainable development and conserving natural capital. Environment. Development and Sustainability. 5(3): 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025720911995
  37. Vuta M, Andreica A, Calin AM. 2015. Rephrasing the challenges for sustainable development. Calitatea. 16(S1): 556.
  38. Yoo SH. 2007. Measurement of the Environmental Value of the Seomjing-River Estuary. Journal of Environmental policy. 6(2): 1-25. [Korean Literature]
  39. Zhou SY, Chen H, Li SC. 2010. Resources use and greenhouse gas emissions in urban economy: ecological input-output modeling for Beijing 2002. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 15(10): 3201-3231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.11.026

Cited by

  1. 지역 생태자산의 훼손 취약성에 대한 거주민의 인식 차이 - 경기도 파주지역을 대상으로 - vol.49, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2021.49.1.031