Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure

응용생태공학회 (Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

급경사 복원 농경지 토양 유실 저감을 위한 개량제 효율 및 현장 적용성 평가

Evaluation of Amending Materials to Reduce Soil Loss from Sloping Remediated Agricultural Land

  • Hwang, Wonjae (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Minseok (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Hyun, Seunghun (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Ji, Won hyun (Technology Research Center, Mine Reclamation Corporation) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hwan (Technology Research Center, Mine Reclamation Corporation)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.18
  • 심사 : 2017.09.20
  • 발행 : 2017.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

광산 활동에 의해 오염된 농경지의 복원은 개량제 처리와 복토를 기반의 미량원소 안정화 기법으로 진행되고 있다. 최근 복원된 부지 중 경사 농경지에서 토양 유실 문제가 대두되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 4종의 개량제 (벤토나이트, 석회, 유기물, 제강슬래그)를 다양한 비율로 단일 또는 복합처리 한 후 입단 형성의 효율을 평가했다. 복토재는 점토함량이 다른 3가지 토양 (A 토양=9.4%, B토양=14.7%, C 토양=21.2%)을 대상으로 했다. 단일처리 결과, A 토양은 유기물 5%, B와 C 토양은 석회 5%가 각 토양의 대조구에 비해 입단 형성이 가장 효과적이었다. 9가지 복합처리구 중에서 A 토양은 유기물 3% + 석회 1%, B와 C 토양은 유기물 1% + 석회 3% 처리구의 입단 형성이 가장 높았다 (A 토양=30.4%, B 토양=25.0%, C 토양=36.5%). 현장처리를 위해 각 복토재 (A 토양=0.045, B 토양=0.051, C 토양=0.054)와 국내 농경지의 평균 (0.032) 토양침식인자 차이만큼을 개량제에 의한 목표 입단 형성량으로 설정하였다(29.1% 입단형성). 비용편익을 고려한 최적 개량제 선정한 결과 A와 B 토양은 석회 3%, C 토양은 석회 5%가 가장 적합 했으며, 이를 통한 경사진 복원된 경사 농경지에서 토양 유실을 효과적이고 경제적으로 저감할 것으로 예측된다. 본 연구에서 석회 처리에 의한 토양 알칼리도 상승은 고려하지 않았다.

Restoration of min-impacted arable land is often performed through stabilization of trace elements by amendment treatment combined with (clean) soil covering on the surface. Recently, soil loss problem from sloping remediated agricultural lands has risen as an emerging concern. In this study, efficacy of aggregation formation was assessed by single and binary treatments of four potential amendments (bentonite, lime, organic matter, and steel slag) applied on three cover soils having different clay contents (9.4, 14.7, and 21.2% for A, B, and C soils respectively). In results of single treatments, 5% organic matter for A soil and 5% lime for B and C soils were found most effective for the aggregation formation compared to the respective controls (without amendments). Among nine binary treatments, 3% organic matter + 1% lime for A soil and 1% organic matter + 3% lime for both B and C soils led to the highest formation of aggregation (30.4, 25.0, and 36.5% for A, B, and C soils). For a site-application, the soil erodibility difference between the cover soils (0.045, 0.051, and 0.054 for A, B, and C soils, respectively) and the national average of arable land (0.032) was assumed to be compensated by amendment addition, which is equivalent to 29.1% aggregation formation. To achieve the aggregation goal, 5% lime for A and B soils and 3% lime for C soil were best in the consideration of benefit/cost, thereby effectively and economically reducing soil loss from sloping remediation site. Soil alkalinity induced by lime treatment was not considered in this work.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amezketa, E. 1999. Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of sustainable agriculture 14: 83-151. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v14n02_08
  2. Angima, S.D., Stott, D.E., O'Neill, M.K., Ong, C.K., and Weesies, G.A. 2003. Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment 97: 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00011-2
  3. Baek, S.H., Kim, J.Y., Lee, S.U., and Kim, S.J. 2010. Influence of Continuous Application of Gypsum, Popped Rice Hull, and Zeolite on Soil Aggregation of Reclaimed Sandy Loam Soils. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 43: 642-647. (in Korean)
  4. Bronick, C.J. and Lal, R. 2005. Soil structure and management: A review. Geoderma 124: 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005
  5. Canton, Y., Sole-Benet, A., Asensio, C., Chamizo, S., and Puigdefabregas, J. 2009. Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils relationships with runoff and erosion. Catena 77: 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.011
  6. Doan, T.T., Henry-des-Tureaux, T., Rumpel, C., Janeau, J.L., and Jouquet, P. 2015. Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Science of the Total Environment 514: 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.005
  7. Duchicela, J., Sullivan, T.S., Bontti,E., and Bever, J.D. 2013. Soil aggregate stability increase is strongly related to fungal community succession along an abandoned agricultural field chronosequence in the Bolivian Altiplano. Journal of Applied Ecology 505: 1266-1273.
  8. Jung, B.G., Choi, J.W., Yun, E.S., Yoon, J.H., and Kim, Y.H. 2001. Monitoring on Chemical Properties of Bench Marked Upland Soils in Korea. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 34: 326-332. (in Korean)
  9. MOE. 2017. Enforcement Decree of the Soil Environment Conservation Act No. 14476, Ministry of Environment.
  10. Liu, X.H., Han, F.P., and Zhang, X.C. 2012. Effect of biochar on soil aggregates in the Loess Plateau: results from incubation experiments. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14: 975-979.
  11. MIRECO. 2013. Yearbook of MIRECO Statistics. Mine Reclamation Corporation, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  12. NIAST. 2011. Methods of analysis of soil and plant. National institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea. (in Korean)
  13. Roth, C.H., Pavan, M.A. 1991. Effects of lime and gypsum on clay dispersion and infiltration in samples of a Brazilian Oxisol. Geoderma 48: 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(91)90053-V
  14. Tisdall, J.M., and Oades, J. 1982. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. European Journal of Soil Science 33: 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x
  15. Yun, J.H. 2004. Review and discussion on development of soil quality indicators. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 37:3 191-198. (in Korean)
  16. Wischmeier, W.H., Johnson, C.B., and Cross, B.V. 1971. Soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 26: 189-193.
  17. Wuddivira, M.N., and Camps-Roach, G. 2007. Effects of organic matter and calcium on soil structural stability. European Journal of Soil Science 58: 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00861.x