DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception and production of Korean and English stops by bilinguals with extensive experience residing in the U.S.: Individual patterns

  • Oh, Eunjin (Department of English Language and Literature Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2017.07.28
  • Accepted : 2017.09.14
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

This study aimed to examine how Korean-English bilinguals make use of VOT and F0 cues in perception and production of Korean (lenis vs. aspirated) and English (voiced vs. voiceless) stops. It was explored whether bilinguals with extensive experience living in the U.S. exhibit native-like or interactive patterns in the cue use for both languages. Participants produced monosyllabic word-initial stops within a carrier sentence in each language, and performed forced-choice identification tasks with synthesized stimuli varying in 7 VOT steps and 7 F0 steps with base tokens of /$t^han$/ for Korean and /$t{\ae}n$/ for English. Listeners were required to select either /tan/ or /$t^han$/ for Korean and either /$d{\ae}n$/ or /$t{\ae}n$/ for English. The results from binary logistic regression analyses for each listener indicated that all bilinguals placed greater weight on F0 than VOT when distinguishing between the Korean lenis and aspirated stops, and greater weight on VOT than F0 in distinguishing between the English voiced and voiceless stops. In terms of production, all participants showed remarkably overlapping ranges in the VOT dimension and separating ranges in the F0 dimension for the stop contrast of Korean, while forming overlapping ranges in the F0 dimension and separating ranges in the VOT dimension for the stop contrast of English. These results indicate that the bilinguals with extensive exposure to L2 manage the stop systems of the two languages independently, both in perception and production, employing the opposite cue use for stops in the two languages. It was also found that the absolute beta-coefficient values of the perceptual cues for Korean stops were generally smaller than those for English and those reported in a previous study as for later bilinguals, which may have resulted from Korean not being their dominant language.

Keywords

References

  1. Abramson, A., & Lisker, L. (1985). Relative power of cues: F0 shift versus voice timing. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 25-33). New York: Academic Press.
  2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ on February 2, 2016.
  3. Fowler, C., Sramko, V., Ostry, D., Rowland, S., & Halle, P. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001
  4. Guion, S. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second language. Phonetica, 60, 98-128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071449
  5. Kang, K.-H. (2010). Generational differences in the perception of Korean stops. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 2, 3-10.
  6. Kang, K.-H., & Guion, S. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1672-1683. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2166607
  7. Kang, Y. (2014). Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.005
  8. Kim, M.-R. (2008). "Lax" stops in Korean revisited: VOT neutralization. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 14(2), 3-21.
  9. Kim, M.-R. (2012). L1-L2 transfer in VOT and F0 production by Korean English learners: L1 sound change and L2 stop production. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4(3), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2012.4.3.031
  10. Kim, M.-R., Beddor, P., & Horrocks, J. (2002). The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 30(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0152
  11. Kong, E., & Yoon, I. (2013). L2 proficiency effect on the acoustic cue-weighting pattern by Korean L2 learners of English: Production and perception of English stops. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.4.081
  12. Ohde, R. (1984). Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 224-230. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.390399
  13. Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003
  14. Schertz, J., Warner, N., Lotto, A., & Cho, T. (2014). Phonetic cue weighting strategies in a non-native language: Individual variability and plasticity. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting. Minneapolis.
  15. Shultz, A., Francis, A., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, EL95-EL101. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4736711
  16. Silva, D. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000911
  17. Whalen, D., Abramson, A., Lisker, L., & Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2152-2159. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406678