품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제45권3호
  • /
  • Pages.335-347
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

해외 선진국 규정 분석을 통한 국내 정부품질보증 효율성 향상 방안

Improving Government Quality Assurance Efficiency by Analyzing Related Instructions of Advanced Countries

  • 서상원 (국방기술품질원 품질경영운영실) ;
  • 노태주 (국방기술품질원 품질경영운영실) ;
  • 변재현 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부)
  • Seo, Sangwon (Quality Management Bureau, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Roh, TaeJoo (Quality Management Bureau, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Byun, Jai-Hyun (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Engineering Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.01
  • 심사 : 2017.09.06
  • 발행 : 2017.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Defense government agencies in the world continuously try to improve operational efficiency in government quality assurance activities. The purpose of this paper is to propose some suggestions to enhance efficiency of government quality assurance (GQA) activities based on the analysis of the current quality assurance methods of advanced foreign agencies such as DCMA and NATO. Methods: In order to propose new directions, reviews and analyses are executed. (1) Former research results in Korea for enhancing GQA are reviewed, and their limitations are addressed. (2) Updated policies and procedures of the US DCMA and NATO are reviewed and their advantages are presented. (3) Current GQA policies and procedures are contrasted with those of US DCMA and NATO. Results: Suggestions for efficient Korean GQA activities are given in several aspects: GQA paradigm shift, clarification of GQA methods, facility-wide GQA, risk management for suppliers, counterfeit mitigation policy, data collection and control. Conclusion: Reviews on the government quality assurance policies and procedures of DTaQ, DCMA, and NATO are executed and compared with each other. The results of this research are expected to be useful guidelines to improve GQA policies and procedures in Korea, making it possible to realize more efficient GQA activities in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn N. S. 2015. "Suggestion for Enhancement of Product Examination Government Quality Assurance Activity." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 43(3):327-340. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.327
  2. Ahn N. S. 2015. "Suggestion for Change in Risk Management based on Government Quality Assurance Activities of Military Supplies." Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 16(9):5914-5923. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.9.5914
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2013. Government Contract Quality Assurance (GCQA) Surveillance Planning DCMA-INST 309.
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2013. Process Review - QA DCMA-INST 311.
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2013. Product Examination DCMA-INST 324.
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2015. Data Collection and Analysis DCMA-INST 323.
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2015. Counterfeit Mitigation DCMA-INST 1205.
  8. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2017. DCMA policy lists, Accessed May 10. http://www.dcma,mil/POLICIES.
  9. Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA). 2017. Introduction to DCMA, Accessed May 16. http://www.dcma.mil.
  10. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ). 2016. Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation, Revised on September 28. http://www.DTaQ.re.kr.
  11. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ). 2017. Organization Journal Summer.
  12. Government Accountability Office(GAO). 2016. Counterfeit Parts: DoD needs to improve reporting and oversight to reduce supply chain risk.
  13. Kim, Y. S., Choi, J. S., Kim, D. H., Noh, J. Y., Kim, K. Y., Lee, I. H., Yoo, J. M., Kim, Y. H., and Jung W. K. 2010. Defense Quality Management, Hyungseul Press.
  14. NATO Standardization Office(NSO). 2015. NATO Mutual Government Quality Assurance(GQA) Edition B, Version 3.
  15. North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO). 2017. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_124879.htm, Accessed May 18, 2017.
  16. Public Procurement Service(PPS). 2017. http://pps.go.kr, Public Procurement Service of Korea homepage accessed August 22, 2017.
  17. Shin, B. C., Byun, J. H., Lee, C. W., Lee, K. Y., Choi, J. S., Woo, H. S., and Seo, B. G. 2015. "Small-Sample Inspection Plans for the New Product Quality Level Evaluation of Finite Population : Focused on Guided Weapons in Development Stage." Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers 41(5):481-487. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2015.41.5.481
  18. Shin B. C., Hwang W. Y., Ahn N. S., Kim D. H., Lee G. L., Jang B. K., and Byun J. H. 2016. "Suggestions on enhancing the effectiveness of government quality assurance activities for military supplies in production stage." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 44(1):153-166. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.153