한국초지조사료학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)

  • 제37권2호
  • /
  • Pages.116-124
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2287-5824(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5832(eISSN)
한국초지조사료학회 (The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Feed Value and Usability of Soybean Varieties as Livestock Forage

  • 투고 : 2017.05.03
  • 심사 : 2017.06.12
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This experiment was conducted to evaluate feed value and usability of soybean varieties as livestock forage. In this study, three soybean cultivars, OT93-26, Geomjeongsaeol, and Pungwon, were harvested at R5 (beginning seed development)- and R6 (full seed)-reproductive stages for analyzing feed value of soybean. Days to R5 stage harvest of OT93-26 among the three soybean cultivars was 55 days and the shortest while Pungwon took 103 days to reach at R6 stage. The R6-harvested soybeans had higher dry matter (DM) yields and crude protein (CP) content than the R5-harvested. However, both DM and CP were the highest in the R6-harvested Geomjeongsaeol. Contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of Pungwon harvested at R5 were the highest whereas the R6-harvested Geomjeongsaeol had the lowest. Digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV) of the R6-harvested Geomjeongsaeol and Pungwon were higher than those of the R5-harvested, but in case of OT93-26, those at R6 stage were low rather than those at R5 stage. However, soybean could be used as alternative forage with high feed value for livestock. Taken together, Geomjeongsaeol could be used for developing new forage soybean varieties with high feed value, and R6 would be the optimum harvesting stage for yield and quality of forage soybean.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Acikgoz, E., Sincik, M., Karasu, A., Tongel, O., Wietgrefe, G., Bilgili, U., Oz, M., Albayrak, S., Turan, Z.M. and Goksoy, A.T. 2009. Forage soybean production for seed in mediterranean environments. Field Crops Research. 110:213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.08.006
  2. Acikgoz, E., Sincik, M., Wietgrefe, G., Surmen, M., Cecen, S., Yavuz, T., Erdurmus, C. and Goksoy, A. 2013. Dry matter accumulation and forage quality characteristics of different soybean genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 37:22-32.
  3. AOAC. 2016. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 20th Edition. AOAC International, Rockville, MD, USA.
  4. Bal, M.A. 2006. Effects of hybrid type, stage of maturity, and fermentation length on whole plant corn silage quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 30:331-336.
  5. Blount, A.R.S., Wright, D.L., Sprenkel, R.K., Hewitt, T.D. and Myer, R.O. 2002. Forage Soybeans for Grazing, Hay and Silage (SS-AGR-180). Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
  6. Cho, C.H., Seung, Y.G. and Kim, S.M. 1994. Classification of Soybean Genotypes based on Seasonal Response of Flowering, and Maturity by Principal Component Analysis. Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 26:405-413.
  7. Cho, N.K., Yun, S.T., Kang, H.S. and Cho, Y.I. 2003. Selection of forage soybean cultivars in Jeju region. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 23:299-306. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2003.23.4.299
  8. Chu, Y.H., Oh, J.H., Chae, J.C., Seung, Y.K., Son, B.Y. and Chung, K.W. 1996. Variation of Flowering, Maturity and Morphological Characteristics in Summer Type Soybeans. Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 28:269-275.
  9. Chung, E.S., Jo, M.H., Kim, J.K., Nam, D.W., Jin, S.J., Jang, S.Y. and Kang, H.S. 2010. Agronomic and Silage Traits of Corn over Time. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 30:325-332. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.4.325
  10. Darmosarkoro, W., Harbur, M.M., Buxton, D.R., Moore, K.J., Devine, T.E. and Anderson, I.C. 2001. Growth development, and yield of soybean lines developed for forage. Agronomy Journal. 93:1028-1034. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351028x
  11. Fehr, W.R., Caviness, C.E., Burmood, D.T. and Pennington, J.S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science. 11:929-931. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
  12. Frederick, J.R., Camp, C.R. and Bauer, PJ. 2001. Drought-stress effects on branch and mainstem seed yield and yield components of determinate soybean. Crop Science. 41:759-763. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.413759x
  13. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 379.
  14. Hintz, R.W., Albrecht, K.A. and Oplinger, E.S. 1992. Yield and quality of soybean forage as affected by cultivar and management practices. Agronomy Journal. 84:795-798. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050007x
  15. Islam, M.R., Ishida, M., Ando, S., Nishida, T. and Yoshida, N. 2004. Estimation of Nutritive Value of Whole Crop Rice Silage and Its Effect on Milk Production Performance by Dairy Cows. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 17:1383-1389. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1383
  16. Khan, N.A., Cone, J.W., Fievez, V. and Hendriks, W.H. 2012. Causes of variation in fatty acid content and composition in grass and maize silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 174:3-45.
  17. Kim, S.L., Lee, Y.H., Chi, H.Y., Lee, S.J. and Kim, S.J. 2007. Diversity in lipid contents and fatty acid composition of soybean seeds cultivated in Korea. Korean Journal of Crop Science. 52:348-357.
  18. Kim, Y.S., Myung, K.H. and Na, J.S. 1982. Nutritive values of soybean straws of the different varieties. Korean Journal of Animal Science. 24:422-426.
  19. Kumar, A., Pandey, V., Shekh, A.M. and Kumar, M. 2008. Growth and yield response of soybean (Glycine max L.) in relation to temperature, photoperiod and sunshine duration at Anand, Gujarat, India. American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy. 1:45-50.
  20. Lee, E.J., Choi, H.J., Shin, D.H., Kwon, C.H., Shannon, J.G. and Lee, J.D. 2014. Evaluation of Forage Yield and Quality for the Accessions Derived from Inter-specific Cross between Wild and Cultivated Soybeans. Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 46:66-77. https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.1.066
  21. Lee, J.D. 2014. Development of high quality forage soybean variety derived from wild soybean and establishment of soybean forage production. MAFRA. No. of publish registration: 11-1543000-000609-01.
  22. Lee, S.H. 2015. Crops cultivation of Alternative rice by revenue model of high- production forage. Rural Development Administration (RDA). No. of project: PJ0088432013.
  23. McWilliams, D.A., Berglund, D.R. and Endres, G.J. 2015. Soybean Growth and Management . North Dakota State University.
  24. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea (MAFRA). 2016. Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Statistics Yearbook. Retrieved from http://lib.mafra.go.kr
  25. Munoz, A.E., Holt, E.C. and Weaver, R.W. 1983. Yield and quality of soybean hay as influenced by stage of growth and plant density. Agronomy Journal. 75:147-148. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500010038x
  26. National Institute of Crop Science (NICS). 2006. Project report for rice research. pp. 222-224.
  27. Park, M.R., Seo, M.J., Lee2, Y.Y. and Park, C.H. 2016. Selection of Useful Germplasm Based on the Variation Analysis of Growth and Seed Quality of Soybean Germplasms Grown at Two Different Latitudes. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology. 4:462-474. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2016.4.4.462
  28. Piper, E.L. and Boote, K.J. 1999. Temperature and cultivar effects on soybean seed oil and protein concentrations. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 76:1233-1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0099-y
  29. Purcell, L.C., Salmeron, M. and Ashlock, L. 2014. Arkansas Soybean Production Handbook: Soybean Growth and Development; http://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/mp197/chapter2.pdf (accessed March 27, 2016).
  30. Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F. and Jorgensen, N. 1987. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science. 47:747-759.
  31. Rotz, C.A., Satter, L.D., Mertens, D.R. and Muck, R.E. 1999. Feeding strategy, nitrogen cycling, and profitability of dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 82:2841-2855. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75542-6
  32. Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2012. Agricultural Science Technology Standards for Investigation of Research.
  33. Russell, B., O'Connort, J.D., Fox, D.G., Van Soest, P.J. and Sniffen, C.J. 1992. A Net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science. 70:3551-3561. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113551x
  34. Shin, H.Y. 2008. Screening of soybean genetic resources for forage production. The paper for the degree of master of Gyeongsang National University.
  35. Specht, J.E., Chase, K., Macrander, M., Graef, G.L., Chung, J., Markwell, J.P., Germann, M., Orf, J.H. and Lark, K.G. 2001. Soybean response to water: A QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Science. 41:493-509. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.412493x
  36. Takagi, H., Hashimoto, Y., Yonemochi, C., Asai, Y., Yoshida, T., Ohta, Y., Ishibashi, T. and Watanabe, R. 2002. Digestibility of nutrients of roughages determined by total feces collection method in Thoroughbreds. Journal of Equine Science. 13:23-27. https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.13.23
  37. USDA. 2009. Oilseeds: World Market and Trade. Table 03: Major Vegetable Oils: World Supply and Distribution at Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade Monthly Circular. FOP 1-09.
  38. Van Soest, P.J. and Robertson, J.B. 1980. Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. In: W.J. Pigden, C.C. Balch and M. Graham (Eds.), Standardization of Analytical Methodology in Feeds. International Research Development Center, Ottawa, Canada. pp. 49-60.
  39. Willard, C.J. 1925. The time of harvesting soybeans for hay and seed. Agronomy Journal. 17:157-168. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1925.00021962001700030006x