Advances in Computational Design

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic algorithms for balancing multiple variables in design practice

  • Received : 2017.07.13
  • Accepted : 2017.07.21
  • Published : 2017.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper introduces the process for Multi-objective Optimization Framework (MOF) which mediates multiple conflicting design targets. Even though the extensive researches have shown the benefits of optimization in engineering and design disciplines, most optimizations have been limited to the performance-related targets or the single-objective optimization which seek optimum solution within one design parameter. In design practice, however, designers should consider the multiple parameters whose resultant purposes are conflicting. The MOF is a BIM-integrated and simulation-based parametric workflow capable of optimizing the configuration of building components by using performance and non-performance driven measure to satisfy requirements including build programs, climate-based daylighting, occupant's experience, construction cost and etc. The MOF will generate, evaluate all different possible configurations within the predefined each parameter, present the most optimized set of solution, and then feed BIM environment to minimize data loss across software platform. This paper illustrates how Multi-objective optimization methodology can be utilized in design practice by integrating advanced simulation, optimization algorithm and BIM.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, S. (2010), "Analysis of procedures and workflow for conducting energy analysis using autodesk revit, gbXML and trave 700", IBPSA-USA J., 4(1), 56-63.
  2. Bazjanac, V. (2008), IFC BIM-Based Methodology for Semi-automated Building Energy Performance Simulation, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
  3. Chipperfield, A., Fleming, P., Pohlheim, H. and Fonseca, C. (1994), Genetic Algorithm Toolbox User's Guide, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Version, 1.
  4. Garcia, E.G. and Zhu, Z. (2015), "Interoperability from building design to building energy modeling", J. Build. Eng., 1, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.03.001
  5. Kilian, A. (2006), "Design innovation through constraint modeling", Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, U.S.A.
  6. Miller, N. (2011), http://wiki.theprovingground.org/usc-arch517-galapagos, The Proving Ground.
  7. Reinhart, C.F. and Walkenhorst, O. (2011), "Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds", Energy Build., 33(7), 683-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5
  8. Roudsari, M.S., Pak, M. and Smith, A. (2013), "Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally conscious design", Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Conference, Lyon, France.
  9. Thiele, L., Miettinen, K., Korhonen, P.J. and Molina, J. (2009), "A Preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization", Evolut. Comput., 17(3), 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.2009.17.3.411
  10. Vierlinger, R. and Hofmann, A. (2013), "A Framework for flexible search and optimization in parametric design", Proceedings of the Design Modeling Symposium Berlin.
  11. Welch, R., Egerter, A., Tucker, S. and Connock, C. (2016), "A BIM workflow for iterative and informative energy modeling", Proceedings of the ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA 2016 Building Performance Modeling Conference, UT.
  12. Yi, Y.K. and Malkawi, A.M. (2009), "Optimizing building form for energy performance based on hierarchical geometry relation", Automat. Constr., 18(6), 825-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.03.006
  13. York, D.A. and Cappiello, C.C. (1981), DOE-2 Engineers Manual (Version 2. 1A) (No. LBL-11353; LA-8520-M), Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA, U.S.A., Los Alamos National Lab., NM, U.S.A.
  14. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M, and Thiele, L. (2001), SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, TIK-Report 103, 2001.

Cited by

  1. A semi-automated method for integrating textural and material data into as-built BIM using TIS vol.5, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2020.5.2.127