Science of Emotion and Sensibility (감성과학)

Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility (한국감성과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Shopping Value, Ease of Use, and Usefulness on Mobile Purchase Intention

쇼핑가치, 사용용이성, 유용성이 모바일 구매의도에 미치는 영향

  • Chae, Jin Mie (School of Global Fashion Business, Hansung University)
  • 채진미 (한성대학교 글로벌패션산업학부)
  • Received : 2016.08.17
  • Accepted : 2017.02.21
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of consumers' shopping value(SV), ease of use(EOU), and usefulness(U) on their purchase intention(PI) in mobile shopping mall. Path hypotheses in structural equation model which was constructed for this purpose were verified. In addition, the research model was analyzed according to the groups classified by the level of purchase experience in mobile shopping mall. The survey was limited to the respondents in their 20s and 30s living in Seoul and other metropolitan areas who had purchased fashion products in mobile shopping mall. 411 useful data collected from on-line survey were analyzed by descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and pearson's correlation analysis using SPSS 21 and AMOS 19. The results of verifying the hypotheses were as follows: First, SV was composed of two factors which included hedonic shopping value(HSV) and utilitarian shopping value(USV). Second, the research model was verified as an acceptable model in explaining the influence of consumers' SV, EOU, and U on PI. Third, seven hypotheses among nine hypotheses were accepted in high purchasers. HSV did not have a significant influence on PI, and EOU did not affect PI significantly. Fourth, five hypotheses were accepted in light purchasers. HSV affected U significantly while USV had a significant impact on EOU and PI. EOU affected U, and U affected PI significantly. In conclusion, USV was proven to be the factor affecting PI directly as well as indirectly. Eou and U also had a significant influnce on PI in mobile fashion shopping. These results will provide mobile marketers with the differentiated strategies to make consumers lead to mobile purchase.

본 연구에서는 모바일 환경에서 패션제품을 구매할 때 소비자의 구매의도에 영향을 미치는 영향 변수로 쇼핑가치와 새로운 기술을 수용하는데 영향을 주는 신념 변수로 알려진 사용용이성과 유용성을 채택하여 경로모형을 구성하여 검정하였고, 구매경험에 따른 집단 별(중구매/경구매 집단)로 경로모형을 비교분석하였다. 온라인 설문 전문업체를 통해 스마트 폰을 통해 패션제품을 구매한 경험이 있는 20-30 대 성인을 대상으로 설문지 분석을 시행하였고, 총 411부의 유효한 데이터를 SPSS 21과 AMOS 19 프로그램을 이용하여 분석하였다. 쇼핑가치는 감성적인 차원의 쾌락적 쇼핑가치와 실용적인 차원의 실용적 쇼핑가치로 분류되었고 구성변수의 신뢰성이 확인되었다. 경로모형의 적합성은 적합한 것으로 입증되었으며, 최근 1년 동안 스마트폰을 통해 패션제품을 구매한 횟수에 따라 중구매 집단과 경구매 집단으로 분류하여 경로모형을 비교분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 두 집단 모두 공통적으로 쾌락적 가치보다는 실용적 가치가 모바일 구매의도에 미치는 직접적인 영향력이 유의한 것으로 나타났고, 사용용이성은 직접적으로 구매의도에 영향을 미치기보다는 유용성을 거쳐 구매의도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 중구매 집단의 경우, 쾌락적 쇼핑가치가 구매의도에 주는 영향과 사용용이성이 구매의도에 주는 영향을 제외하고는 모든 경로가 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 경구매 집단에서는 쾌락적 쇼핑가치가 사용용이성에 주는 영향, 실용적 쇼핑가치가 유용성에 주는 영향, 쾌락적 쇼핑가치가 구매의도에 주는 영향, 사용용이성이 구매의도에 주는 영향의 경로가 유의하지 않은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 본 분석 결과는 다양한 유통채널을 사용하여 제품을 구매하는 현대 소비자들을 모바일 구매로 유도하기 위한 차별화된 모바일 마케팅 전략을 수립하는데 근거가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quartly, 24(4), 665-694. doi:10.2307/3250951
  2. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. doi:10.1086/209376
  5. Bae, G.-S. (2004). A study on the factors which affect the intention to users in using mobile commerce in the view of technology acceptance model. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627. doi:0022- 3514.41.4.607 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607
  7. Chae J. M. (2016). The effect of mobile fashion shopping characteristics on consumer's purchase intention: Applying the technology acceptance model. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 18(1), 38-47. doi:10.5805/ SFTI.2016.18.1.38
  8. Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185-204. doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128
  9. Cho, Y. J., & Seo, S. W. (2013). Purchase intention of fashion products in private shopping malls: Focused on usefulness of SNS and shopping value. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 63(5), 61-71. doi:10.7233/jksc.2013.63.5.061
  10. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10. 2307/249008 https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1973). Attribution of responsibility: A theoretical note. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(2), 148-153. doi: 10.1016/0022- 1031(73)90006-1
  14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: With readings (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101. doi:10.2307/1251707
  16. Hong, B. S., & Na, Y.-K. (2008). The effect of the perceived hedonic value, usefulness and ease of use on attitude toward using in internet shopping mall and purchase intention of the fashion merchandise. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.1.147
  17. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305. doi:10.2307/249498
  18. Johnson, K. K. P., Yoo, J.-J., Rhee, J., Lennon, S., Jasper, C., & Damhorst, M. L. (2006). Multi-channel shopping: Channel use among rural consumers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(6), 453-466. doi:10.1108/ 09590550610667047
  19. Ju, K. W., & Lee, E. J. (2015). The effect of shopping orientation, fashion innovativeness and perceived mobile benefits on mobile clothing. Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion Design, 15(2), 147-164.
  20. Jung, S.-M., & Park, J.-Y. (2014). The effects of online purchase experience on the transaction intention using smartphone. Journal of CEO and Management Studies, 17(2), 69-88.
  21. Kim, D. W., Lee, T. M., & Kang, M. S. (2003). A study on the effects of perceived risk and perceived quality on the mobile-commerce adoption: An extension to the technology acceptance model. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 35, 171-193.
  22. Kim, M. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2014). Effects of mobile fashion shopping characteristics on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, purchase attitude, and purchase intention of mobile fashion shopping mall: Focusing on smartphone users. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 22(2), 240-257. doi:10.7741/rjcc. 2014.22.2.240
  23. Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2015). 2015 Survey on the Mobile Internet Usage Summary (2015년 모바 일 인터넷이용 실태조사요약보고서). Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://isis.kisa.or.kr/ board/? pageId=060100&bbsId=7&itemId=809&pageIndex=1
  24. Ku, Y. S., & Lee, S.-M. (2001). A study on the effect of on-line store attributes on consumers’ purchase intention of internet fashion product shopping. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(6), 1100-1111.
  25. Lee, C. S., & Pahng, S. B. (2004). The effects of shopping value on online purchasing intention: Focus on product attribute importance as intervening variable. Korea Marketing Review, 19(2), 41-69.
  26. Lee, Y. J. (1993). Basic data analysis using SPSS/ PC+(SPSS/PC+를 이용한 기초자료 분석). Seoul: Sukjung.
  27. Lohse, G. L., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (2000). Consumer buying behavior on the internet: Findings from panel data. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 14(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(200024)14:1<15::AID-DIR2>3.0.CO;2-C
  28. Na, Y.-K., Hong, B.-S., & Kang, S.-M. (2008). A study on the effect of the perceived value and risk of internet shopping on the purchase intention of the fashion merchandise. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(8), 1213-1225. doi:10.5850/ JKSCT.2008.32.8.1213
  29. Park, E. J., & Kang, E. M. (2005). Effects of shopping value, fashionb shopping mall attributes, emotions and purchasing intention on purchasing behavior in internet fashion shopping malls. Family and Environment Research, 43(7), 117-128.
  30. Rho, H. J. (2003). Social research analysis by SPSS/ Amos (SPSS/AMOS에 의한 사회조사 분석). Seoul: Hyungseul.
  31. Ruth, C. J. (2000). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to determine factors affecting behavioral intentions to adopt electronic shopping on the world wide web: A structural equation modeling approach. Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
  32. Shim, K. Y., Kim, Y.-M., & Kim, W.-H. (2002). The influences of the characteristics of internet shopping malls and the shopping traits of their users involved in e-commerce on purchase intent. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 2(1), 59-76.
  33. Shin, J. C., & Kang, M. S. (2004). A study on the impact of consumer value on the mobile wireless internet on the usage intention and time of the mobile wireless internet. Journal of Consumer Studies, 15(2), 125-143.
  34. Statistics Korea. (2015). Retail sales and online shopping trends in october 2015 (2015년10월 소매판매 및 온라인쇼핑 동향). Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://kostat .go.kr/portal /korea/kor_nw/3/ index.board?bmode=download&bSeq=&aSeq=35006 3&ord=4
  35. Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70(2), 163-178. doi:10.1016/0022-4359(94)90013-2
  36. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  37. Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 41(6), 747-762. doi:10. 1016/j.im.2003.08.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011
  38. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25-33. doi:10.1177/0013164474 03400104
  39. Yu, J. P. (2012). Structural equation modeling concepts and understanding: Amos 4.0-20.0 common ((우종필교수의) 구조방정식 모델 개념과 이해: Amos 4.0-20.0 공용). Seoul: Hannarae Academy.