DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Handling Quality Improvements of Fly-By-Wire Helicopter using Combined Model Following Controller with Decoupler

  • Lee, Jangho (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Eung-Tai (Flight Control Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ;
  • Ryu, Hyeok (Flight Control Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ;
  • Shim, Hyunchul (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2017.04.07
  • Accepted : 2017.05.15
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The combined model following control (MFC)-decoupler system is employed for a full authority fly-by-wire utility helicopter to enhance handling qualities. The MFC, which governs the vehicle to follow the prescribed model, is widely employed for modern helicopters. However, it may not be sufficient as helicopters often suffer significant cross coupling. The coupled responses between control axes of a helicopter increase the pilot's work load and may degrade handling qualities. As the decoupler is introduced to the MFC, the combined MFC-decoupler effectively solves the coupling problems and enhances handling qualities. The proposed system is verified via the handling qualities prediction using the mathematical dynamics model. The analysis results are confirmed through the piloted simulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Fletcher, J. W., Lusardi, J., Mansur, M. H., Arterburn, D. R., Cherepinsky, O., Driscoll, J., Morse, C. S. and Kalinowski, K. F., "UH-60M Upgrade Fly-By-Wire Flight Control Risk Reduction using the RASCAL JUH-60A In-Flight Simulator", American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada, April 29-May 2, 2008.
  2. Aeronautical Design Standard 33E: Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft, U.S. Army Aviation, and Missile Command, Aviation Engineering Directorate, ADS-33E-PRF, Redstone Arsenal, AL, 2000.DS-33E-PRF.
  3. Stevens, B. L. and Lewis, F. L., Modern Design Techniques, Aircraft Control and Simulation, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1992, pp. 421-437, Chap. 5.
  4. Osder, S. and Caldwell, D., "Design and Robustness Issues for Highly Augmented Helicopter Controls", Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1375-1380. doi:10.2514/3.11399
  5. Lee, J., Kim, S. P., Shin, D., Choi, H. S., Seong, K. J. and Kim, Y., "Lyapunov Control Law for Automatic Approach for Unmanned Helicopter Landing", Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 53, No. 182, 2011, pp. 283-290. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.53.283
  6. Harding, J. W., Moody, S. J., Jeram, G. J., Mansur, M. H. and Tischler, M. B., "Development of Modern Control Laws for the AH-64D in Hover/Low Speed Flight", American Helicopter Society 62nd Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, May 9-11, 2006.
  7. Adams, C., Potter, J. and Singhose, W., "Input-Shaping and Model-Following Control of a Helicopter Carrying a Suspended Load", Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 94-105. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000326
  8. Landis, K. H., Davis, J. M., Dabundo, C. and Keller, J. F., Advanced Flight Control Research and Development at Boeing Helicopters, Advances in Aircraft Flight Control, edited by Tischler, M. B., Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, 1996, pp. 103-141, Chap. 4.
  9. Winsor, C. and Roy, R., "Application of Specific Optimal Control to the Design of Desensitized Model Following Control Systems", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1970, pp. 326-333. doi:10.1109/ TAC.1970.1099453
  10. Tischler, M. B., Colbourne, J. D., Morel, M. R., Biezad, D. J., Levine, W. S. and Moldoveanu, V. "CONDUIT - A New Multidisciplinary Integration Environment for Flight Control Development", NASA TM 112203, USAATCOM TR 97-A-009, 1999.
  11. Blanken, C. L., Pausder, H. J. and Ockier, C. J., "An Investigation of the Effects of Pitch-Roll (De)Coupling on Helicopter Handling Qualities", NASA Technical Memorandum, USAATCOM Technical Report 95-A-003, May 1995.