DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Circadian Effects on Postural Stability in Young Adults

  • Son, Sung Min (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2017.05.22
  • Accepted : 2017.06.28
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have addressed the effect of diurnal circadian rhythms on postural stability, and thus the aim of the present study was to examine circadian effects on static and dynamic postural stability in young adults. Methods: Twenty-four subjects (9 men, 11 women: age=$22.20{\pm}1.77$, height=$167.20{\pm}10.47$, weight=$59.85{\pm}10.66$) from a university community volunteered for this study. Static and dynamic balance testing, which recorded using a Good Balance system (Good Balance, Metitur Ltd, Finland) was conducted at 9:00, 13:00, and 17:00 hours on two consecutive days, and the sequencing of static and dynamic balance tests were randomized. Results were analyzed using the non-parametric one-way repeated Friedman test in SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and variable found to be significant were subjected to Wilcoxon post hoc testing. Results: Static and dynamic balance showed significant difference at the three times assessments (test at 9:00, 13:00, and 17:00) during circadian. In the post hoc test of static (anteroposterior distance, mediolateral distance and COP (center of pressure) velocity) and dynamic balance (performance time), 13:00 was the longer and faster than 9:00. Conclusion: These results indicated that control of postural balance is influenced by diurnal circadian rhythms, and confirm that control of postural balance is more effective and better performance in the 09:00 hours than 13:00 hours or 17:00 hours.

Keywords

References

  1. Pollock AS, Rowe PJ, Paul JP et al. What is balance? Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14(4):402-6. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215500cr342oa
  2. Ruhe A, Fejer R, Walker B. The test-retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions--a systematic review of the literature. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):436-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.012
  3. Loram ID, Lakie M. Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: The intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability. J Physiol. 2002;545(Pt 3):1041-53. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025049
  4. Lord SR, Clark RD, Webster IW. Postural stability and associated physiological factors in a population of aged persons. J Gerontol. 1991;46(3): M69-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.3.M69
  5. Sparto PJ, Parnianpour M, Reinsel TE et al. The effect of fatigue on multijoint kinematics, coordination, and postural stability during a repetitive lifting test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1997.25.1.3
  6. Deschamps T, Magnard J, Cornu C. Postural control as a function of time-of-day: influence of a prior strenuous running exercise or demanding sustained-attention task. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-26
  7. Guariglia DA, Pereira LM, Dias JM et al. Time-of-day effect on hip flexibility associated with the modified sit-and- reach test in males. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(12):947-52. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1283182
  8. Souissi N, Bessot N, Chamari K et al. Effect of time of day on aerobic contribution to the 30-s wingate test performance. Chronobiol Int. 2007;24(4):739-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520701535811
  9. Kwon YH. Influence of time-of-day on respiratory function in normal healthy subjects. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2013;25(6):374-8.
  10. Winget CM, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17(5):498-516.
  11. Helbostad JL, Sturnieks DL, Menant J et al. Consequences of lower extremity and trunk muscle fatigue on balance and functional tasks in older people: a systematic literature review. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-56
  12. Papa EV, Foreman KB, Dibble LE. Effects of age and acute muscle fatigue on reactive postural control in healthy adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30(10):1108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.08.017
  13. Stins JF, Kempe CL, Hagenaars MA et al. Attention and postural control in patients with conversion paresis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(3):249-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.009
  14. Hoyer D, Clairambault J. Rhythms from seconds to days. Physiological importance and therapeutic implications. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2007;26(6):12-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMB.2007.907094
  15. Baccouch R, Zarrouk N, Chtourou H et al. Time-of-day effects on postural control and attentional capacities in children. Physiol Behav. 2015;142:146-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.029

Cited by

  1. Influence of plantar cutaneous sensitivity on daily fluctuations of postural control and gait in institutionalized older adults: a hierarchical cluster analysis vol.36, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2019.1594869
  2. Time of day effect in postural control in young soccer players: Field dynamic assessment vol.52, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1658166
  3. Does Time of Day influence postural control and gait? A review of the literature vol.92, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.023