DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of SW education applying Design Thinking on creativity of elementary school pre-service teachers

디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육이 초등학교 예비교사의 창의성에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2017.05.12
  • Accepted : 2017.06.23
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of SW education applying design thinking on the creativity of elementary school pre-service teachers. We conducted research on 22 elementary school pre-service teachers who applied for a lecture on elementary computer education at a university in Jeju city. The pre-service teachers who did not have basic understanding of SW education and basic knowledge about scratch program which is an EPL tool for research. Therefore, we had time to learn the basic education of SW education and the basic functions of the scratch program over 18 periods before the pre-test of creativity. After conducting pre-test of creativity and conducting SW education applying design thinking over 21 hours, we conducted post-test of creativity. As a creativity test tool, TTCT pattern test forms A and B of Torrance were used. As a result of the verification, it was found that SW education applying design thinking was effective in improving creativity of elementary school pre-service teachers.

본 연구는 디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육이 초등학교 예비교사의 창의성에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 제주 소재 한 대학교 초등컴퓨터교육 강좌를 신청한 학부 1학년 22명의 초등학교 예비교사들을 대상으로 연구를 실시하였다. 연구대상인 예비교사들은 SW교육에 대한 기본적인 이해를 하지 못하고 있을 뿐만 아니라 연구에 사용할 EPL 도구인 스크래치 프로그램에 대한 기초적인 지식을 갖추지 못하였다. 따라서 창의성 사전검사 이전에 18차시에 걸쳐 SW교육에 대한 기본 교육과 스크래치 프로그램의 기본 기능을 학습하는 시간을 가졌다. 창의성 사전검사를 실시하고 21시간에 걸쳐 디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육을 진행한 후 창의성 사후검사를 실시하였다. 창의성 검사도구로는 Torrance의 TTCT 도형 검사지 A, B형을 사용하여 분석하였다. 검증 결과, 디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육이 초등학교 예비교사들의 창의성 향상에 효과적인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn Kyeong Mi(2010). The Effect of the Programming Education on the Elementary School Student's Learning-Flow and programming ability, Gyeongin National University of Education.
  2. Choi Hyun A, Park Jea Wan(2014), Developing the Design Process in Education to Improve Creativity Based on Design Thinking, Digital Design Studies, 14(4), 677-686. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.3.067
  3. Code.org Web site(2017). https://code.org/
  4. Computer Hope Web site(2017). https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/o/onlicoll.htm
  5. Dorst, K.(2012). Frame Innovation: Create new thinking by design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. D-school Web site(2017). https://dschool-old.stanford.edu/
  7. Gil Soon Hee(2011), Utilizing the computer, music academy activation of training plans, Jeju national university.
  8. Guilford, J. P.(1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827
  9. Hong Sun Jeong(2006). Intelligence and creativity : Psychological inquiry For Human intelligence. Yangseowon : Seoul.
  10. Kelly T. & Kelly D.(2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All. Cheongrim Publishing Company.
  11. Kim Kyung Hee(2006a). Can we trust creativity tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking(TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2
  12. Kim Kyung Hee(2006b). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
  13. Kim Kyung Hee and others(2010). The programme for international students assessment(PISA 2009) results, Korea Institute for Currculum and Evaluation.
  14. Lee Ji Sun(2015). A Study of Design Thinking Adaptation to Computer Education Based on Computational Thinking-Focused on Computer Education for Elementary School. The Korean Society Of Design Culture, 21(1), 455-467.
  15. Lifewire Web site(2017). https://www.lifewire.com/faqs-about-online-collaboration-2377250
  16. Marinez-Moyano, I. J.(2006). Exploring the Dynamics of Collaboration in Interorganizational Settings, Ch. 4, p. 83, in Schuman (Editor). Creating a Culture of Collaboration.
  17. Maslow, A. H.,(1963). The creative attitude. Structurist, 3, 4-10.
  18. Mednick, S.(1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
  19. Ministry of Education(2015). Human Resource Development Plan for the SW-oriented society.
  20. Ministry of Education(2015). Operating instructions for Software Education.
  21. Padlet Web site(2017). https://padlet.com/
  22. Park Byeong Gi(1998). Based on creativity-education. Science of education : Seoul.
  23. Park Hyo Min(2014). Global software educational status and tools trends, Korea Internet & Security Agency Report focus 3.
  24. Park Rak Joo(2012). Scratch Programing and Elementary Students' Self-efficacy : Focused on the 4th Grade Students, Cheongju National University of Education.
  25. PXD Web site(2017). http://story.pxd.co.kr/585
  26. Razzouk, R. Shute, V.(2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
  27. Rogers, C.(1962). Toward a theory of creativity. Ins. Parnes & H.
  28. Ryan, B. M.(2012). Design Thinking in Education An Exploration of the Benefits, Challenges, and Possibilities. Savannah College of master's thesis.
  29. Scratch Web site(2017). http://scratch.mit.edu/
  30. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.(1991). Creating creative minds. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 608-614.
  31. Sung Jung Sook, Kim Hyeon Cheol(2015). Analysis on the International Comparison of Computer Education in Schools. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 18(1), 45-54.
  32. Torrance, E. P.(1978). Giftedness in solving furture problems. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1978.tb00162.x
  33. Torrance, E. P.(2010), Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Directions manual and scoring guide(Figual test booklet A), Korean FPSP.
  34. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Firestein, R. L.(1983). Theoretical perspectives on creative learning and its facilitation: An overview. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1983.tb00970.x
  35. Visser, W.(2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by

  1. 학습자의 컴퓨터 문제해결 선호방법 분석 vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.113
  2. SW교육에 참가하는 학생의 학습 지속의도에 미치는 변인에 관한 연구 vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.91
  3. CSCL 기반 디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육이 초등학생의 창의성과 문제해결능력에 미치는 효과 vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.4.427
  4. 비전공자를 대상으로 한 프로그래밍 수업에서 동질적 학습 집단 구성을 위한 사례 분석 vol.17, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2019.17.12.059
  5. 예비교사를 위한 게임 프로그래밍 교육모델 4E 개발 vol.23, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.561
  6. 프로그래밍 언어의 조절효과 및 학습자의 학습특성과 성취도와의 관계 분석 vol.19, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.4.049