DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유방암 방사선치료에서 변형영상정합기법을 이용한 선량비교

Dose Comparison Using Deformed Image Registration Method on Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

  • 원영진 (인제대학교 일산백병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 김종원 (건양대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 김정훈 (건양대학교병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Won, Young Jin (Department of Radiation Oncology, InJe University Ilsan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jong Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, KonYang University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jung Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, KonYang University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2017.02.03
  • 심사 : 2017.03.14
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31

초록

본 연구는 거대유방암 환자대상으로 환자의 움직임과 모양의 변화에 따른 선량변화를 콘빔단층촬영영상(CBCT)과 변형영상정합기법(DIR)을 적용하여 적응형방사선치료계획을 재구성하여 기존에 사용된 쐐기접선조사기법(TWF)과 종속조사면 병합치료방법(FIF) 그리고 세기조절방사선치료계획(IMRT)을 이용하여 선량비교평가를 시행하고자 하였다. CT와 CBCT를 MIM6 사용하여 변형영상정합기법영상(DIRCT)을 만들어 각각의 치료계획을 시행하였다. 계획표적체적(PTV)은 왼쪽 유방이고 균질성지표(HI), 적합성지표(CI), 조사범위지표(CVI)의 값을 확인하였다. 관심장기(OAR)는 반대쪽 유방, 폐 그리고 심장이며 평균선량, 최대선량과 장기 특성에 따른 기타 지표들을 비교 분석하였다. PTV인 유방의 HI 값은 DIRCT를 이용한 모든 치료계획방법에서 증가하였으며, CVI, CI의 결과에서는 DIRCT를 이용한 치료계획방법에서 모두 감소하였다. 폐에서의 평균선량과 최대선량은 DIRCT 이용한 IMRT 치료계획방법이 다른 치료계획보다 증가함을 보였으며, 심장의 평균선량과 최대선량은 DIRCT를 이용한 TWF와 FIF는 감소했으며, 오히려 IMRT의 결과는 증가하였다. 유방암 방사선치료 시 환자의 움직임과 셋업 오차로 인해 유방모양의 변경을 감암했을 때 TWF와 IMRT보다 FIF 방법을 이용했을 때 반대편 유방과 심장, 폐의 피해선량을 효과적으로 감소시킬 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the treatment plan by applying CBCT and DIR to dose changes according to the change of the patient's motion and breast shape in the large breast cancer patients and to compare the doses using TWF, FIF and IMRT. CT and CBCT were performed with MIM6 to create DIRCT and each treatment plan was made. The patient underwent computed tomography simulation in both prone and supine position. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), coverage index (CVI) to the left breast as planning target volume (PTV) were determined and the doses to the lung, heart, and right breast as organ at risk (OAR) were compared by using dose-volume histogram and the unique property of each organ. The value of HI of the PTV breast increased in all treatment planning methods using DIRCT, and CVI and CI were decreased in the treatment planning methods using DIRCT.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Annamaria Ferrari, Giovanni Ivaldi, Maria Cristina Leo nardi, Elena Rondi, Roberto Orecchia: Prone breast radiotherapy in a patient with early stage breast cancer and a large pendulous breast, Tumori 95, 394-397, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1177/030089160909500323
  2. Sung Kyu Kim, Sei One Shin, Myung Se Kim: Radiother- apy Treatment Planning using Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer, Korean Journal of Medical Physics 3(2), 59-65, 1992
  3. Mencarelli A, van Beek S, van Kranen S, Rasch C, van Heek M, Sonke JJ: Validation of deformable registration in head and neck cancer using analysis of variance, Med Phys 39(11), 6879-6884, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4760990
  4. Yan D, Liang J: Expected treatment dose construction and adaptive inverse planning optimization: implementation for offine head and neck cancer adaptive radiotherapy, Med Phys 40(2), 021719, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4788659
  5. Suzy Kim, Yunseok Choi: Dosimetric advantages of the field-in-field plan compared with the tangential wedged beams plan for whole-breast irradiation, Korea Journal of Medical Physics, 25(4), 199-204, 2014
  6. Loic Feuvret, Georges Noel, Jean-Jacques Mazeron Pierre Bey: Conformity index: A review, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 64, 333-342, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028
  7. Myonggeun Yoon, Sung Yong Park, Dongho Shin, et al: A simple scoring method to calculate the homogeneity and coverage index of dose volume histogram, Korean Journal of Medical Physics, 17(1), 6-16, 2006
  8. BR Lee, SY LEE, MG Yoon: Dosimetric comparison of radiation treatment techniques for breast cancer: 3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT, J Radiological Scie Tech, 36(3), 237-244, 2013
  9. WK Chung, M Chung, DO Shin, DW Kim: Impact of respiratory motion on breast cancer intensitymodulated radiation therapy, Korea J Medi Phys. 27(2), 93-97, 2016