DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resistance to fluoroquinolone of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs and cats in Daegu

대구지역 개와 고양이에서 분리된 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius의 fluoroquinolone 내성

  • Cho, Jae-Keun (Kyung-Metropolitan Health & Enviornmental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-MI (Kyung-Metropolitan Health & Enviornmental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hwan-Deuk (Kyung-Metropolitan Health & Enviornmental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Kyung-Metropolitan Health & Enviornmental Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Chang-Ryoul (Kyung-Metropolitan Health & Enviornmental Research Institute)
  • 조재근 (대구광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김정미 (대구광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김환득 (대구광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 김경희 (대구광역시보건환경연구원) ;
  • 양창렬 (대구광역시보건환경연구원)
  • Received : 2017.03.02
  • Accepted : 2017.03.21
  • Published : 2017.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigated the fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance and presence of gyrA and grlA gene in 87 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates obtained from clinical samples of dogs and cats. Also, the profiles of FQ resistance compared with methicillin resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) isolates. FQ resistance was observed for enrofloxacin (41.4%), ciprofloxacin (39.1%), norfloxacin (36.8%), ofloxacin and levofloxacin (32.2%, respectively), and moxifloxacin (31.0%). Thirty-eight (43.7%) of 87 S. pseudintermedius isolates were resistant to more than one FQ. Twenty-six (64.5%) of 38 FQ resistant isolates were resistant to all the six FQ tested. Of 38 FQ resistant isolates, gyrA gene was detected in all isolates but grlA gene was not found. Moreover, 19 MRSP isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin (63.2%), ciprofloxacin (57.9%), norfloxacin (52.6%), and ofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin (47.4%, respectively). FQ resistance were highly prevalence in S. pseudintermedius isolates from dogs and cats. Our results emphasize the prudent use of antimicrobial agents to companion animals is necessary for prevent antimicrobial resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Bisognano C, Vaudaux P, Rohner P, Lew DP, Hooper DC. 2000. Induction of fibronectin-binding proteins and increased adhesion of quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by subinhibitory levels of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44: 1428-1437. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.6.1428-1437.2000
  2. Blondeau JM. 2004. Fluoroquinolones: mechanism of action, classification, and development of resistance. Surv Ophthalmol 49: S73-S78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.01.005
  3. Cho JK, Lee MR, Kim JM, Kim HD. 2016. Methicillin-resistant or susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs and cats. Korean J Vet Serv 39: 175-181. https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2016.39.3.175
  4. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-second informational supplement. M100-S22. Wayne, Pa, USA.
  5. Dziva F, Wint C, Auguste T, Heeraman C, Dacon C, Yu P, Koma LM. 2015. First identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains among coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from dogs with otitis externa in Trinidad, West Indies. Infect Ecol Epidemiol 5: 29170-http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/iee.v5.29170.
  6. EMA. 2014. Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 26 EU/EEA countries in 2012(Fourth ESVAC report). European medicines agency. London, United Kingdom.
  7. Heinen E. 2002. Comparative serum pharmacokinetics of the fluoroquinolones enrofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin, and orbifloxacin in dogs after single oral administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 25: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2885.2002.00381.x
  8. Hooper DC. 2002. Fluoroquinolone resistance among gram-positive cocci. Lancet Infect Dis 2: 530-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00369-9
  9. Intorre L, Vanni M, Di Bello D, Pretti C, Meucci V, Tognetti R, Soldani G, Cardini G, Jousson O. 2007. Antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanism of resistance to fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 30: 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00896.x
  10. Jacoby GA. 2005. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones. Clin Infect Dis 41: S120-126. https://doi.org/10.1086/428052
  11. Kang MH, Chae MJ, Yoon JW, Lee SY, Yoo JH, Park HM. 2014. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and methicillin in ophthalmic isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from companion animals. Can Vet J 55: 678-682.
  12. Kawakami T, Shibata S, Murayama N, Nagata M, Nishifuji K, Iwasaki T, Fukata T. 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility and methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans isolated from dogs with pyoderma in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 72: 1615-1619. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.10-0172
  13. Kizerwetter-Swida M, Chrobak-Chmiel D, Rzewuska M, Binek M. 2016. Resistance of canine methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains to pradofloxacin. J Vet Diagn Invest 28: 514-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638716660131
  14. Loeffler A, Linek M, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Sung JM, Winkler M, Weiss R, Lloyd DH. 2007. First report of multiresistant, mecA-positive Staphylococcus intermedius in Europe: 12 cases from a veterinary dermatology referral clinic in Germany. Vet Dermatol 18: 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00635.x
  15. Lu T, Zhao X, Drlica K. 1999. Gatifloxacin activity against quinolone-resistant gyrase: allele- specific enhancement of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities by the C-8-methoxy group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43: 2969-2974.
  16. Moodley A, Damborg P, Nielsen SS. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in methicillin susceptible and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius of canine origin: literature review from 1980 to 2013. Vet Microbiol 171: 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.008
  17. Onuma K, Tanabe T, Sato H. 2012. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from healthy dogs and dogs affected with pyoderma in Japan. Vet Dermatol. 23: 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.00995.x
  18. Pallo-Zimmerman LM, Byron JK, Graves TK. 2010. Fluoroquinolones: then and now. Compend Contin Educ Vet 32: E1-9.
  19. Pedersen K, Pedersen K, Jensen H, Finster K, Jensen VF, Heuer OE. 2007. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from diagnostic samples from dogs. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm269
  20. Petersen U. 2001. The evolution of quinolone: from nalidixic acid to the quinolones of the third generation. Pharm Unserer Zeit 30: 376-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-1003(200109)30:5<376::AID-PAUZ376>3.0.CO;2-O
  21. Priyantha R, Gaunt MC, Rubin JE. 2016. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius colonizing healthy dogs in Saskatoon, Canada.Can Vet J 57: 65-69.
  22. Rantala M, Lahti E, Kuhalampil J, Pesonen S, Jarvinen AK, Saijonmaa-Koulumies, Honkanen- Buzalski T. 2004. Antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in dogs given antibiotics for chronic dermatological disorders, compared with non-treated control dogs. Acta Vet Scand 45: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-45-37
  23. Rubin JE, Chirino-Trejo M. 2011. Prevalence, sites of colonization, and antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from healthy dogs in Saskatoon, Canada. J Vet Diagn Invest 23: 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871102300227
  24. Ruiz J. 2003. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1109-1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg222
  25. van Duijkeren E, Catry B, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pomba MC, Pyorala S, Ruzauskas M, Sanders P, Threlfall EJ. Torren-Edo J, Torneke K. 2011. Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 2705-2714. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr367
  26. Vigo GB, Giacoboni GI, Gagetti PS, Pasteran FG, Corso AC. 2015. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains isolated from dog clinical samples. Rev Argent Microbiol 47: 206-211.
  27. Wang Y, Yang J, Logue CM, Liu K, Cao X, Zhang W, Shen J, Wu C. 2012. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from canine pyoderma in North China. J Appl Microbiol 112: 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05233.x
  28. Yamagishi J, Kojima T, Oyamada Y, Fujimoto K, Hattori H, Nakamura S, Inoue M. 1996. Alterations in the DNA topoisomerase IV grlA gene responsible for quinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 1157-1163.
  29. Yoo JH, Yoon JW, Lee SY, Park HM. 2010. High prevalence of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine pyoderma and otitis externa in veterinary teaching hospital. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 798-802.
  30. Zur G, Elad D, Sterenzy-Agiv N. 2011. Increased resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius to the commonly used antibiotics in canine dermatology. Israel J Vet Med 66: 143-150.