Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review

Kyung Hee University Management Research Institute (경희대학교 경영연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Key Factors to be Considered for Making Union Digital Centers (UDCs) Sustainable in Bangladesh

  • Received : 2016.12.27
  • Accepted : 2017.02.27
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this era of information and communication technology (ICT), efficient and cost effective public services delivery had become highly expected by the citizen in every country. In developed countries, digitally enabled public services were established in recent years while the developing countries like Bangladesh were trying to establish this advancement. The UNDP, USAID and the Government of Bangladesh launched the Access to Information (A2I) programme to improve the services delivery to reach at the doorsteps of citizen. Under this umbrella, Union Digital Centers (UDCs) were launched in 2009 at every Union of Bangladesh to reduce the "Digital Divide" in public service delivery. Thus, it had become the concern nowadays to make this initiative sustainable for a long run, this study focused to find out some key factor to be considered for making them sustainable in Bangladesh. It explored the previous researches related to these centers and same categories of institutions in other countries where the researchers argued about some issues in different aspects. Based on their findings and discussions, this study tried to analyze the key issues influencing the sustainability factors. To analyze the factors for sustainability, it addressed the financial, investment, business development and publicity, competencies of entrepreneurs, community acceptance and gender issues, institutionalization and physical infrastructure concerned with UDCs. The Government agencies, policy makers, researchers could be consider those recommendations for developing the strategies for sustaining the operations of UDCs in Bangladesh.

Keywords

References

  1. Bakshi. R. K. and T. Rahman., 2016, Expansion of selected services through union digital centers: Bangladesh priorities, Copenhagen Consensus Center.
  2. Bailur, S., 2006, Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects, Information Technologies and International Development 3, 61-80.
  3. Brundtland, G. (Ed.), 1987, Our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Chauhan. R., 2009, National e-governance plan in india, united nations university international institute for software technology (UNU-IIST), India
  5. Colle, R. D, 2005, Memo to telecentre planners. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries 21, 1-13.
  6. Falch, M., 2004, Tele-centres in Ghana, Telematics and Informatics 21, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00025-X
  7. Faroqi, G. M., 2015, Financial sustainability of union digital centres in Bangladesh, Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Business and Social Sciences (pp. 1102- 1116).
  8. George, A. L. and A. Bennett, 2005, Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  9. Gerhan, D. R. and S. M. Mutula, 2007, Testing a recent model of ICT in development: Botswana and its university, Information Technology for Development 13, 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20060
  10. Hanna, N. K, 2010, Transforming Government and Building the Information Society: Challenges and opportunities for the developing world, New York: Springer.
  11. Harris, R. W., A. Kumar and V. Balaji, 2003, Sustainable telecentres? two cases from India, in: Krishna, S. and Madon, S. (Eds.) The Digital Challenge: Information Technology in the Development Context, Chapter 8, 124-135.
  12. Heeks, R., 2002, Information systems and developing countries: failure, success, and local improvisations, Information Society 18, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
  13. Heeks, R., and S. Bhatnagar, 1999, Understanding success and failure in information age reform. InR. Heeks (Ed.), London; New York: Routledge.
  14. Hosman, L. and E. Fife, 2008, Improving the prospects for sustainable ICT projects in the developing world, International Journal of Media & Cultural Politic 4, 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.4.1.51_1
  15. Kumar, R., 2005, eChoupals: A study on the financial sustainability of village internet centers in rural Madhya Pradesh, Information Technologies and International Development 2, 45-73.
  16. Kumar, R. and M. L. Best, 2006, Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India, Information Society 22, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240500388149
  17. Naik, G., 2011, Designing a sustainable business model for e-governance embedded rural telecentres (EGERT) in India, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB) Management Review 23, 110-121.
  18. Naik, G., S. Joshi and K. P. Basavaraj, 2012, Fostering inclusive growth through e-governance embedded rural telecenters (EGERT) in India. Government Information Quarterly 29, 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.009
  19. Proenza, F. J., 2001, Telecenter sustainability: myths and opportunities, Journal of Development Communication 12, 94-109.
  20. Roman. R. and R. D. Colle, 2002, Themes and issues in telecentre sustainability. development informatics, Institute for Development Policy and Management.
  21. Shadat. W. B. and K. M. Rahman, 2016, Formalising migration through union digital centre (UDC) and skill upgradation: Bangladesh Priorities. Copenhagen Consensus Center.
  22. Shahnewaz, N., M. E. Haque, M. S. I. Afrad and M. Z. Hoque, 2015, Role of union information and service centre in community development, American Journal of Computation, Communication and Control 2, 40-47.
  23. Wellenius, B. M, 2003, Sustainable telecenters: A guide for government policy.
  24. Yin, R. K., 1993, Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications.
  25. Yin, R. K., 2003, Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.