한국농림기상학회지 (Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-9
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-5671(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1859(eISSN)
한국농림기상학회 (Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

장마기 집중호우와 배수방법이 토양수분 및 포도 '진옥'과 '캠벨얼리'의 광합성 특성과 생육에 미치는 영향

Effects of Heavy Rain during Rainy Season and Drainage Methods on Soil Water Content, Photosynthesis Characteristics, and Growth in 'Jinok' and 'Campbell Early' Grapes

  • Choi, Young Min (Department of Horticulture, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jung, Sung Min (Fruit Research Division, Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Dong Geun (Department of Horticulture, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.03
  • 심사 : 2017.02.14
  • 발행 : 2017.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 논에서 밭으로 개원하는 포도농가가 증가하고 있으며, 토양 배수성이 극히 불량한 이러한 토양은 여름철의 집중호우기(장마기)때 과습 또는 침수해를 받을 우려가 매우 높다. 따라서 본 연구는 배수방법(무처리, 명거배수, 암거배수)을 달리하여 토양의 수분변화를 측정하고, 이에 따른 포도 '진옥'(Vitis spp.)과 '캠벨얼리'(V. labruscana)의 생육반응을 비교하고자 수행하였다. 집중 호우 이후 토양과습에 해당하는 -15kpa 이상의 토양수분포텐셜 유지시간은 무처리, 명거배수구, 암거배수구에서 각각 352, 348, 180시간으로 조사되었으며, 상대적으로 암거배수의 점토함량은 다른 배수처리구보다 약 8~12% 낮았다. 집중 호우 이후 작물수분스트레스지수는 암거배수가 가장 낮고 무처리가 가장 높았으며, 광합성속도는 반대의 결과를 보여 처리간 차이는 유의하였으나 품종간에는 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다. 또한 엽면적과 주간부단면적의 생장량 역시 암거배수가 무처리와 명거배수보다 효과적이었다.

Recently, it is increasing the grape farm which is converted from paddy field to orchard. These soil which are poor drainage extremely also can be damaged a lot by excessive water or flooding during heavy rain season on summer. Therefore the aim of this study was carried out to measure the changes of soil water potential and to compare the growth responses of 'Jinok' (Vitis spp.) and 'Campbell Early' (V. labruscana) grapes under three drainage systems (control, conventional drainage, and under drainage). After heavy rain, soil water potential holding times above -15 kpa applied water excessive were 352, 348 and 180 hours in control, conventional, and under drainage systems, respectively. The clay content of the under drainage system was lower than the other systems about 8-12%. The crop water stress index was lowest in the under drainage and highest in the control. Also, photosynthetic rate has showed the opposite result with crop water stress index. It was significant differences between the treatments but, the value has not shown significantly different between the varieties. In addition, leaf area and the trunk growth rate was more effective in under drainage than in the control and conventional drainage.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beckman, T. G., R. L. Perry, and J. A. Flore, 1992: Shot-term flooding affects gas exchange characteristics of containerized sour cherry trees. HortScience 27(12), 1297-1301.
  2. Champagnol, F., 1998: Criteria of quality of the harvest. In: C. Flanzy. (Ed.) Oenology, Scientific and Technological Foundations, 653-659. Lavoisier Tec & Doc, Paris.
  3. Childers, N. F., and D. G. White, 1942: Influence of submersion of roots on transpiration, apparent photosynthesis, and respiration of young apple trees. Plant Physiology 17(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.4.603
  4. Costa, J. M., M. F. Ortuno, C. M. Lopes, and M. M. Chaves, 2012: Grapevine varieties exhibiting differences in stomatal response to water deficit. Functional Plant Biology 39, 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11156
  5. Doh, D. H., S. J. Kim, S. K. Jin, and R. C. Jo, 1994: A study on variation of the soil physical characteristics of multi utilized paddy field by the introduction of subsurface drainage facility. Journal of Life Science 1, 87-96.
  6. Faria, T., J. I. Garcia-Plazaola, A. Abadia, S. Cerasoli, J. S. Pereira, and M. M. Chaves, 1996: Diurnal changes in photoprotective mechanisms in leaves of cork oak (Quercus suber) during summer. Tree Physiology 16, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.115
  7. Fuchs, M., 1990: Infrared measurement of canopy temperature and detection of plant water stress. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 42(4), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00865986
  8. Gardner, B. R., B. L. Blad, and D. G. Watts, 1981: Plant and air temperatures in differentially irrigated corn. Agricultural Meteorology 25, 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(81)90073-X
  9. Gates, D. M., 1964: Transpiration and leaf temperature. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 19, 211-238.
  10. Grant, O. M., M. J. Davies, C. M. James, A. W. Johnson, I. Leinonen, and D. W. Simpson, 2012: Thermal imaging and carbon isotope composition indicate variation amongst strawberry (Fragaria$\times$ananassa) cultivars in stomatal conductance and water use efficiency. Environmental and Experimental Botany 76, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.09.013
  11. Guilioni, L., H. G. Jones, I. Leinonen, and J. P. Lhomme, 2008: On the relationships between stomatal resistance and leaf temperatures in thermography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148(11), 1908-1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.009
  12. Han, W. D., D. H. Jung, and H. C. Kim, 1970: Study on mole drainage. pp. 13-19. In Research report of agro-evnironment research. Institude of Agricultural Engineering & Utilization, Suwon, Korea.
  13. Hardie, W. J., and J. A. Considine, 1976: Response of grapes to water-deficit stress in particular stages of development. American Journal of Enology Viticulture 27(2), 55-61.
  14. Idso, S. B., R. D. Jackson, P. J. Pinter, R. J. Reginato, and J. L. Hatfield, 1981: Normalizing the stress-degreeday parameter for environmental variability. Agricultural Meteorology 24, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(81)90032-7
  15. Jackson, R. D., 1982: Canopy temperature and crop water stress. Advances in Irrigation volume 1, 43-80, Elsevier.
  16. Ji, G. H., 1981: Study on subsurface drainage system for the multipurpose paddy field. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 23(4), 15-20.
  17. Jones, H. G., 2004: Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology. Advances in Botanical Research 41, 107-163.
  18. Jones, H. G., M. Stoll, T. Santos, C. de Sousa, M. M. Chaves, and O. M. Grant, 2002: Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 53(378), 2249-2260. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf083
  19. Joo, J. H., 1976: A study of underground drainage in low and wet paddy field. Jinju Agricultural & Forestry Junior College 15, 113-120.
  20. Kang, S. B., H. I. Jang, I. B. Lee, J. M. Park, and D. K. Moon, 2007: Changes in photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of 'Campbell Early' and 'Kyoho' grapevine under long-term waterlogging condition. Korean Journal of Horticutural Science & Technology 25(4), 400-407.
  21. Kim, C. U., 1976: Studies on improvement of low and wet paddy field underdrainage (1) - Change of decreasing water depth and ground water level. Research Review Kyungpook National Univercity 22, 331-338.
  22. Kim, D. S., J. E. Yang, Y. S. Ok, and K. Y. You, 2006: Effect of perforated PVC underdrainage pipe on desalting of plastic film house soils. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 39(2), 65-72.
  23. Kim, L. Y., H. Y. Cho, and K. H. Han, 2003: Effects of tile drain on physicochemical properties and crop productivity of soils under newly constructed plastic film house. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 36(3), 154-162.
  24. Kozlowski, T. T., 1997: Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology 17(7), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.1.1
  25. Kozlowski, T. T., and S. G. Pallardy, 1979: Stomatal responses of Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings during and after flooding. Physiologia Plantarum 46(2), 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1979.tb06549.x
  26. Kwun, S. K., D. O. Jung, and W. D. Han, 1980: Influence of subsurface drain spacings desalinization and drainage tidal reclaimed lands. Research Reports of the Office of Rural Development 22, Korea, 1-9.
  27. Lang, A., and M. Thorpe, 1988: Why do grape berries split. Smart, R., Thornton, R., Rodriguez, S. and Young, J., (eds.) Proceedings of the second international cool climate viticulture and oenology symposium; 11-15. January 1988; Auckland, New Zealand (New Zealand Society for Viticulture and Oenology: Auckland, New Zealand) pp. 69-71.
  28. Lee, S. H., Y. An, S. H. Yoo, and Y. S. Jung, 2001: Desalinization effect of subsurface drainage system with rice hull packing. Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 43(5), 63-69.
  29. Mendelssohn, I. A., K. L. McKee, and W. H. Patrick, 1981: Oxygen deficiency in Spartina alterniflora roots: Metabolic adaptation to anoxia. Science 214(4519), 439-441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.214.4519.439
  30. Naidoo, G., H. Rogalla, and D. J. von Willert, 1997: Gas exchange responses of a mangrove species, Avicennia marina, to waterlogged and drained conditions. Hydrobiologia 352, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003088803335
  31. Perata, P., and A. Alpi, 1993: Plant responses to anaerobiosis. Plant Science 93(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(93)90029-Y
  32. Pezeshki, S. R., and J. L. Chambers, 1985: Stomatal and photosynthetic response of sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) to flooding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15(2), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1139/x85-059
  33. Saglio, P. H., P. Raymond, and A. Pradet, 1980: Metabolic activity and energy charge of excised maize root tips under anoxia. Plant Physiology 66(6), 1053-1057. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.66.6.1053
  34. Sena Gomes, A. R., and T. T. Kozlowski, 1980a: Growth responses and adaptations of Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings to flooding. Plant Physiology 66, 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.66.2.267
  35. Sena Gomes, A. R., and T. T. Kozlowski, 1980b: Responses of Melaleuca quinquenervia seedlings to flooding. Physiologia Plantarum 49(4), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1980.tb03319.x
  36. Sena Gomes, A. R., and T. T. Kozlowski, 1980c: Effects of flooding on growth of Eucalyptus camadulensis and E. globulus seedling. Oecologia 46, 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540117
  37. Skaggs, R. W., S. Hardjoamidjojo, E. H. Wiser, and E. A. Hiler, 1982: Simulation of crop response to surface and subsurface drainage systems. Transactions of the ASAE 25(6), 1673-1678. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.33787
  38. Tripepi, R. R., and C. A. Mitchell, 1984: Stem hypoxia and root respiration of flooded maple and birch seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 60, 567-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb04929.x