DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on Efficiencies of Naturally-Ventilated Multi-Span Greenhouses in Korea

다연동 온실의 자연환기효율성 비교 분석

  • Kwon, Soon-Hong (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Won (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Gu (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Park, Jong-Min (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Choi, Won-Sik (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Soon (Dept. of Bio-Industrial Machinery Eng., Pusan National Univ.)
  • 권순홍 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과) ;
  • 정성원 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과) ;
  • 권순구 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과) ;
  • 박종민 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과) ;
  • 최원식 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과) ;
  • 김종순 (부산대학교 바이오산업기계공학과)
  • Received : 2016.12.06
  • Accepted : 2017.02.09
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

This research analyzed the ventilation effect of the multi-span greenhouse based on the types of greenhouse structure, weather conditions, and locations inside the greenhouse. To compare and analyze the ventilation effects with different types of greenhouse, the uniform environmental conditions should be selected in advance. But these factors are not controlled and require tense many precision facilities and labor forces. Thus, the CFD simulation was used for the air stream to be analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition, for the ventilation effect analysis, the TGD (Tracer Gas Decay) was used to overcome the shortcomings of the current ventilation measurement method. The calculation error of ventilation rate using TGD was low (10.5%). Thus, the TGD is very effective in calculating the ventilation efficiency. The wind direction of 90 degrees showed the best ventilation effect. The ventilation rate also decreased along the air circulation path, and the rate was the lowest around the outlet. The computed fluid method (CFD) turned out to be a power tool for simulating flow behavior in greenhouse.

Keywords

References

  1. Bartzanas, T., T. Boulard, C. Kittas, Effect of vent arrangement on windward ventilation of a tunnel greenhouse, Biosystems Engineering, 88(4), pp. 479-490, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.10.006
  2. Boulard, T., G. Papadakis, C. Kittas, M. Mermier, Air flow and associated sensible heat exchanges in a naturally ventilated greenhouse, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 88, pp. 111-119, (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00043-9
  3. Boulard, T. and B. Draoui, Natural ventilation of a greenhouse with continuous roof vents: measurements and data analysis. J. Agricultural Engineering Research 61, pp. 27-36, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1995.1027
  4. Boulard, T., C. Kittas, J. C. Roy, S. Wang, Convective and ventilation transfers in greenhouses, Part 2: Determination of the distributed greenhouse climate, Biosystems Engineering. 83(2), pp. 129-147, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0114
  5. Bruce, J.M.. Natural ventilation Its role and application in the bioclimatatic system. Farm Building R&D Studies February 1977, 1-8, (1977).
  6. Brugger, M., J. Montero, E. Baeza, J. Perez-Parra. Computational fluid dynamic modeling to improve the design of the spanish parral style greenhouse. The American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 34-46, (2003).
  7. De Jong, Taeke, Natural ventilation of large multi-span greenhouses, Ph.D Dissertation, Wageningen, Netherlands, (1990).
  8. Fatnassi, H., T. Boulard, H. Demrati, L. Bouirden, G. Sappe, Ventilation performance of a large canarian-type greenhouse equipped with insect-proof nets, Biosystem Engineering, 82(1), pp. 97-105, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2001.0056
  9. Fernandez, J. E. and B. J. Bailey, Measurement and prediction of greenhouse ventilation rates, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 58, pp. 229-245, (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90063-A
  10. Hoxey, R. P. and P. J., Richards. Structures of the atmospheric boundary layer below 25m and implications to wind loading on low-rise buildings, Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 44, pp. 317-327, (1992).
  11. Kacira, M., S. Sase, L. Okushima, Optimization of vent configuration by evaluating greenhouse and plant canopy ventilation rates under wind-induced ventilation, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 47(6), pp. 2059-2067, (2004). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17803
  12. Kacira, M., T. H. Short, R. R. Stowell, A cfd evaluation of naturally ventilated, multi-span, sawtooth greenhouses, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 41(3), pp. 833-836, (1998). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17222
  13. Kacira, M., T. H. Short, R. R. Stowell, A fluid dynamic evaluation of naturally ventilated gutter-connected greenhouses, The American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 974059, (1997).
  14. Kacira. M., S. Sase, L. Okushima, Optimization of vent configuration by evaluating greenhouse and plant canopy ventilation rates under wind-indeced ventilation, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineeris, 47(6), pp. 2059-2067, (2004). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17803
  15. Kozai, T. S. Sase and M. Nara, A modeling approach to greenhouse environmental control by ventilation. Acta Hort, vol 106, pp. 125-136, (1980).
  16. Nääs, I. A., D. J. Moura, R. A. Bucklin, F. B. Fialho, An Algorithm for determining opening effectiveness in natural ventilation by wind. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 41(3), pp. 767-771, (1998). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17213
  17. Richardson, G. M. and P. A. Blackmore, The Silsoe structures building: comparison of 1:100 model-scale data with full-scale data, Journal of wind engineering and industry aerodynamics, vol 57, pp. 191-201, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00114-S
  18. Timmon, M.B., How does natural ventilation work and why? American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper No. 90-4551, ASAE. St. Joseph. MI 49085, (1990).