DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in children and adolescents: a single center experience

  • Hyun, Myung Chul (Department of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.10.10
  • Accepted : 2017.11.08
  • Published : 2017.12.15

Abstract

Purpose: Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is less common in pediatric patients than in adult patients. Thus, data for pediatric AVNRT patients are insufficient. Hence, we aimed to analyze the patient characteristics, treatment, and any recurrences in pediatric AVNRT patients. Methods: We reviewed the records of 50 pediatric AVNRT patients who had undergone radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) between January 1998 and December 2016 at a single regional center. The patients were aged ${\leq}18years$. Results: Among 190 pediatric patients who underwent RFCA for tachyarrhythmia, 50 (26.3%; mean age, $13.4{\pm}2.6years$) were diagnosed as having AVNRT by electrophysiological study. Twenty-five patients (25 of 50, 50%) were male. Twenty patients (20 of 50, 40%) used beta-blockers before RFCA. All patients had no structural heart disease except 1 patient with valvular aortic stenosis and coarctation of the aorta. RFCA was performed using the anatomic approach under fluoroscopic guidance. The most common successfully ablated region was the midseptal region (25 of 50, 50%). Slow pathway (SP) ablation and SP modulation were performed in 43 and 6 patients, respectively. Complication occurred in 1 patient with complete atrioventricular block. During follow-up, 6 patients had recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia, as confirmed by electrocardiography. Among them, 5 underwent successful ablation at the first procedure. In 1 patient, induction failed during the first procedure. Conclusion: RFCA is safe and effective in pediatric AVNRT patients. However, further research is needed for establishing the endpoints of ablation in pediatric AVNRT patients and for identifying risk factors by evaluating data on AVNRT recurrence after RFCA.

Keywords

References

  1. Ko JK, Deal BJ, Strasburger JF, Benson DW Jr. Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms and their age distribution in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1028-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90858-V
  2. Wu MH, Lin JL, Lai LP, Young ML, Lu CW, Chang YC, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of tachycardia in children with and without congenital heart disease: indications and limitations. Int J Cardiol 2000;72:221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00183-7
  3. Kugler JD, Danford DA, Houston KA, Felix G; Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation Registry of the Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation Registry of the Pediatric Electrophysiology Society. Pediatric radiofrequency catheter ablation registry success, fluoroscopy time, and complication rate for supraventricular tachycardia: comparison of early and recent eras. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:336-41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00336.x
  4. Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, Saul JP, Tanel RE, Fischbach PS, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: recurrence at 1 year after initially successful ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.067
  5. Brugada J, Blom N, Sarquella-Brugada G, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Deanfield J, Janousek J, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace 2013;15:1337-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut082
  6. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:e27-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.856
  7. Van Hare GF, Carmelli D, Smith WM, Kugler J, Silka M, Friedman R, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: design and implementation of the multicenter study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:332-41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00332.x
  8. Greyling A, Ector J, Garweg C. Radiofrequency catheter ablation in infants and children. SA Heart 2017;14:16-20.
  9. Wasmer K, Dechering DG, Kobe J, Leitz P, Frommeyer G, Lange PS, et al. Patients' and procedural characteristics of AV-block during slow pathway modulation for AVNRT-single center 10year experience. Int J Cardiol 2017;244:158-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.043
  10. Shailesh F, Sewani A, Paydak H. Recurrent AV block following ablation for AVNRT. Indian Heart J 2014;66:710-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2014.10.410
  11. Fenelon G, d'Avila A, Malacky T, Brugada P. Prognostic significance of transient complete atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:698-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80656-0
  12. Williamson BD, Man KC, Daoud E, Niebauer M, Strickberger SA, Morady F. Radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular conduction to control the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:910-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199410063311404
  13. Estner HL, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Deisenhofer I, Schreieck J, Schneider M, et al. Acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia--an analysis of the predictive factors for arrhythmia recurrence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:102-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09364.x
  14. Bastani H, Schwieler J, Insulander P, Tabrizi F, Braunschweig F, Kenneback G, et al. Acute and long-term outcome of cryoablation therapy of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace 2009;11:1077-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup177
  15. Rostock T, Willems S. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:828-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00763_3.x
  16. Liberman L, Hordof AJ, Fishberger SB, Pass RH. The role of isoproterenol testing following radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in children. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26(2 Pt 1):559-61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00094.x
  17. Stellbrink C, Diem B, Schauerte P, Brehmer K, Schuett H, Hanrath P. Differential effects of atropine and isoproterenol on inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2001;5:463-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013258331023
  18. Fujii E, Kasai A, Omichi C, Matsuoka K, Teramura S, Uchida F, et al. Electrophysiological determinants of persistent dual atrioventricular nodal pathway physiology after slow pathway ablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23(11 Pt 2):1916-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07052.x
  19. Kose S, Amasyali B, Aytemir K, Kilic A, Can I, Kursaklioglu H, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with multiple discontinuities in the atrioventricular node conduction curve: immediate success rates of radiofrequency ablation and long-term clinical follow-up results as compared to patients with single or no AH-jumps. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2004;10:249-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JICE.0000026920.40169.9f
  20. Feldman A, Voskoboinik A, Kumar S, Spence S, Morton JB, Kistler PM, et al. Predictors of acute and long-term success of slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a single center series of 1,419 consecutive patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:927-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03092.x

Cited by

  1. Gender associated disparities in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A review article vol.32, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15078