DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Organizational-Level Moderators on the SME Employees' Adoption of Abandonment Option to Manage the Cloud Computing Service Risks

클라우드 서비스 위험 제거를 위한 중소기업 직원의 포기옵션 선택에 관한 조직 차원의 조절 변수 연구

  • Received : 2017.01.11
  • Accepted : 2017.02.22
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

In this Paper, We Empirically Investigated what kind of Risks Exist that Drive high Failure rate of cloud Services, and whether Perception of such risks leads to the Adoption of the Abandonment Option of cloud Services. Such risk Perception is the Individual-level Factor, and we Empirically Tested whether Organizational Contexts such as CEO's Innovativeness and Dandwagon Effect can Moderate the Positive Effects of such Individual-level Risk Perception on the Adoption of Abandonment option. We Collected Survey data from IT Professionals Working for the Small and Medium-sized Companies near Seoul and found that the Perceived Technical Risk and Economic Risk Influence the Adoption of Abandonment Option. Out of two Organizational Contexts, only CEO's Innovativeness Moderates the Positive Influence of Technical Risk on the Adoption of Abandonment Option. Organizational Factors Demonstrated very Limited Moderation Effect on the Influence of Individual-level Perception of Cloud Service Risk on the Adoption of Abandonment Option.

본 연구에서는 콜라우드 서비스의 높은 실패율에 대하여, 어떠한 위험이 존재하는지 살펴보고, 이러한 위험을 제거하기 위한 실물 옵션, 특히 포기 옵션의 채택에 영향을 끼칠 수 있는 위험의 종류에 대하여 실증 분석을 실시하였다. 특히 개인 차원에서 인식하는 위험의 정도가 포기 옵션의 채택에 어떠한 영향을 끼치는 지에 더하여, 조직 차원의 변수 (CEO의 혁신성, 밴드웨건 효과)가 개인 차원의 효과들을 어떻게 조절하는지에 대하여 실증 분석을 실시한다. 수도권 소재 중소기업의 IT 담당자들을 대상으로 설문조사한 내용을 바탕으로, 기술적 위험과 경제적 위험이 포기 옵션의 채택에 유의한 영향을 끼치며, CEO의 혁신성이 기술적 위험의 효과를 억제하는 조절 효과가 검증되었다. 그러나, 밴드웨건 효과는 개인 차원의 영향을 억제하는 조절 효과는 실증적으로 유의하지 않았다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단, 정보통신산업진흥원

References

  1. Digital Daily. 2015. http:;/ddaily.co.kr/cloud/news/article.html?no=127438
  2. Park, S. and Koo, C., “A Study on End User's Intention to Use for Cloud Computing: Testing the Mediating Role of Key Constructs from UT AUT,” The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 141-162, 2012.
  3. Kim, S.,Lee, S. and Hwang, H., “A Study of Factors Affecting Attitude Towards Using Mobile Cloud Service,” Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 83-94, 2013. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2013.18.6.083
  4. Han, H., Yang, H-D. and Kim, K., "Research on Cloud Computing-based SME Information Platform Policy," Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 117-128, 2014. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2014.19.5.117
  5. Kim, S. and Kim, G., “Understanding Organizational Behavior regarding Cloud Computing: Determinants Impacting on the Implementation Process of Cloud Computing and the Moderating Effect of Evolutional Leadership,” The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 37-61, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2016.25.4.37
  6. Kim, T., Yang, J. and Yang, H-D., “Economic Evaluation of Cloud Computing Investment Alternatives,” Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 121-135, 2011. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2011.16.3.121
  7. Nam, S.H., Ahn, JH. and Yang, H-D., “The Effect of IT Service Outsourcing Project Risks on the Intention of Purchasing Real Options based on Transaction Cost Theory,” Asia pacific journal of information systems, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 40-66, 2013.
  8. Nam, S., Kim, T. and Yang, H-D., “The Effect of Exogenous Risks Upon the Choice of Real Options in ERP Projects in Korea: An Empirical Approach,” The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 25-42, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2013.22.3.25
  9. Yang, H-D. and Kim, "The Effect of Cloud Service Risks on the Intention of Purchasing Real Options: Focusing on Public Cloud Service of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises," Information Systems Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 117-140, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2015.17.1.117
  10. Jurison, J., “The Role of Risk and Return m Information Technology Outsourcing Decisions,” Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 239-247, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.1995.27
  11. Willcocks, L., Lacity, M. and Kern, T., “Risk Mitigation m IT Outsourcing Strategy Revisited: Longitudinal Case Research at LISA,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 285-314, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00022-6
  12. Lee, J. and Runge, J., “Adoption of Information Technology m Small Business: Testing Drivers of Adoption for Enterprises,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 44-57, 2016.
  13. Thong, J.Y.L., “An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 187-214, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227
  14. Lacity, M.C. and Hirschheim, R., “The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 73-86, 1993.
  15. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q. and Xue, Y., “Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 59-87, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148781
  16. Hu, Q., Hart, P. and Cooke, D., “The Role of External and Internal Influences of Information Systems Security: A Neo-Institutional Perspective,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 153-172, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.05.004
  17. Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, l C., and Rocchi, M., “An Introduction to Hierarchical Linear Modeling,” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 52-69, 2012. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
  18. Raudenbush, S.W., “Educational Applications of Hierarchical Linear Models: a Review,” Journal of Educational Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 85-116, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164748
  19. Moon, Y., “The Effect of Strategic Recognition and Risks of IT Outsourcing on the Degree of Outsourcing,” Journal of the Korean Operations and Research and Management Science Society, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 21-40, 2002.
  20. Seo, l & S. Chang. 2012. "중소기업 클라우드 서비스 도입의 탐색적 연구," 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 춘계공동학술대회.
  21. Benaroch, M., Lichtenstein, Y. and Robinson, K, “Real Options in IT Risk Management: An Empirical Validation of Risk-Option Relationships,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 827-864, 2006.
  22. Pennings, J.M.E. and Smidts, A., “Assessing the Construct Validity of Risk Attitude,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1337-1348, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1337.12275
  23. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, pp. 93-115, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93
  24. Arthur, W. B. "Increasing Returns and the New World of Business," Harvard Business Review, pp. 100-109, 1996.
  25. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed), Printice-Hall, New Jersey, 1998.
  26. Nunally, J., Psychometric Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  27. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, pp. 39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  28. Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. J., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, San Francisco: JosseyBass, 2000.
  29. Bliese, P. D., "Within-Group Agreement, Non-Independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analyses", in Klein, K.J. & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (Eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 349-381, 2000.

Cited by

  1. 클라우드 서비스 위험이 포기옵션 사용의도에 미치는 효과에 대한 조절변수와 매개변수 연구: IS성숙도 수준의 조절효과와 클라우드 서비스 만족도의 매개효과 vol.22, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.4.065
  2. ERP 서비스 도입 시 국내 물류기업의 실물옵션 활용 수준에 대한 실증 연구 vol.26, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2019.26.6.119
  3. 온라인 쇼핑몰 챗봇 사용자의 활용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 실증 연구 vol.21, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2020.21.4.011