디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.69-76
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

포퓰리즘 정당의 성격과 한계에 관한 연구

A Study on Character and Limitation in Populism

  • Kim, Yong-Chul (Dept. of Public Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.01
  • 심사 : 2017.01.20
  • 발행 : 2017.01.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 서유럽의 포퓰리즘 정당들이 어떠한 정치적 성격을 지니고 있는지 그리고 이들이 주류제도권 내에서 국민들에게 많은 지지를 받고 성공한 이유는 무엇인지 탐색해 보고자 하였다. 연구방법론은 주로 문헌탐색과 현상의 상호관계를 분석하였다. 서유럽의 포퓰리즘 정당들은 서민계층의 이익을 대변해 주고자 하였으나 실패했고 포퓰리즘 정치는 앞으로 다소 지속되겠지만 문제는 민주주의 이념체제와 어떠한 관계를 유지할 것인가 하는 것이 가장 큰 문제이다. 포퓰리즘 정치는 앞으로 현대사회의 모순과 갈등이 지속될수록 그 관심과 지지도는 높아지겠지만 민주주의 제도 자체를 대체할 패러다임으로 성장하기는 어려울 것이다.

This paper focus on universal values and characteristics of populist parties of the Western Europe. Moreover, the causes of the European populist parties successful political activities in the European society, in which democracy is relatively established, quite stably, examined as well. Populist political activities based on simple speech are evidently unfair political actions mobilizing the unreasonable populace. populist politics is difficult to coexist with the modern Western European democracy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Betz, H.G. ""Introduction" in H.G, Bets and S.Immerfall (eds.), The New Politics of the Right", London : Macmillan, 1998.
  2. McLaren L, "Immigration and Trust in Politics in Britain", British Journal of Political Science, vol.42, 2011.
  3. Mudde Cas, "The Poupulist Zeitgeist, Government and Opposition", vol.39, No.4, pp. 541-563, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  4. Bolleyer Nicole & E. Bytzek, "Origins of party formation and new party success in advanced democracies, European Journal of Political Research", vol.52,No.6, pp. 788-789, 2013.
  5. Arditi Benjamin. "Populism or Politics at the Edge of Democracy, Contemporary Politics", vol.9,No.1, pp. 17-31, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356977032000072486
  6. Bobbio Norberto, "The Future of Democracy", Oxford : Polity, 1989.
  7. Leiter D. & M.Clark, "Valence and Satisfaction with Democracy; A cross-national analysis of nine Western European democracy", European Journal of Political Research,vol.54,No.3. pp556-557, 2015.
  8. Canovan Margaret, "Trust the people : Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy", Political Studies, XLVIL, 1999, Populism, N.Y.: Hartcourt Brace, 1981.
  9. Pasquino Gianfranco, "Populism and Deomocracy, D.Albertazzi(eds.) Twenty - First Century Populism : The Spectre of Western European Democracy", N.Y. : Palgrave Macmillian, pp. 15-29, 2008.
  10. Cuperas Rene, "The Fate of European Populism, Dissent", vol. 51(2), pp. 17-20, 2004.
  11. Cahill Ben, Institutions, "Populism and Immigration in Europe", SAIS Review, vol. 27,No.1, 2007.
  12. Fieschi Catherine, "Introduction, Journal of Political Ideology", vol.9,No.4, 2004.
  13. AkkermanTjitske Populism and Democracy : Challenge or Pathology, Acta Politica, vol.38,2003.
  14. Deangelis R.A.)A Rising Tide for Jean-Marie, Jorg and Pauline? Xenophobic Paupulism in Comparative Perspective,Australine Journal of Politics and History, Vol.49,No.1,2003.
  15. Jones, Erik, Populism in Europe,SAISReview, Vol.27,No.1, 2007.
  16. Kim Yong Chul, Analysis on Political Distrust of Governmental Agencies, Journal of Digital Policy & Management, Vol.0, 2015
  17. Yang Suck Jin, A Study on the Universal Welfare Politics in terms of constitutional Value Order, Jounal of Digital Policy & Management Vol.13 No.3, 2014
  18. Soug Kyung Suk, A Study on the Strategy for Realization of Smart Citizens Party, Journal of Digital Policy & Management Vol.9, No.1, 2011
  19. Jung Jin Taek, The case of Study on Smart citizens Party, Journal of Digital Policy & Management, Vol.9,No.10, 2011
  20. DOI : http://www.parties-and-elections.de.
  21. The Economist, Jan, 4th, 2014
  22. Financial Times, 2015.8.28.