한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제20권1호
  • /
  • Pages.97-115
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경관형용사를 활용한 생태축 복원사업의 경관변화요인 분석 - 정면경관을 대상으로-

An Analysis of Landscape Change Factors on Restoration Project of Ecological Ridgeline using Landscape Adjectives -Focused on Frontal View-

  • 이우성 (대구대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 박영대 (대구대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 권태호 (대구대학교 산림자원학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.05
  • 심사 : 2017.02.27
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preference and image on landscape of before and after the restoration in the four study areas where the restoration project of Baekdudaegan ecological ridgeline was carried out and to explore the change factors of image preference according to restoration project. The study areas were Beoljae, Ihwaryeong, Bijoryeong, and Yuksimnyeong and 248 questionnaires were used for analysis. As a result of the recognition analysis on restoration project of ecological ridgeline, the awareness of the project was low at 2.63, the satisfaction of the project was 3.42, and necessity of the project was 4.07. In terms of the preference analysis for landscape photographs, the all preferences of four sites were improved after the project than before. In the result of the landscape image evaluation, images such as 'lifeless', 'uniform' and 'ugly' were high before the project, however, images such as 'clean', 'tidy', and 'stable' were high after the project. As a result of analyzing the change factors of image preference according to the restoration project, adjectives such as 'beautiful-ugly' and 'open-closed' influenced the preference change in common. These findings can be utilized as the base data for the planning direction for the construction of new ecological ridgeline or the landscape conservation of existing ecological ridgeline.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arthur LM, Daniel TC, and Boster RS. 1977. Scenic Assessment: An Overview. Landscape Planning 4: 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(77)90014-4
  2. Ban YU, Lee TH, Baek JI, and Kim MA. 2012. Selecting Representative Landscape Adjectives in Accordance with Landscape Units and Space Types. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 15(2): 95-101. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2012.15.1.95
  3. Cha JG, Moon HG, Lee SM, Choi TY, Park YS, Woo DG, Seo HS, Park HB, Park HY, Lee DH, Kim GM, and Choi JC. 2015. Conservation and Restoration based on Research on the Core Ecological Axis of the Korean Peninsula. Research report, National Institute of Ecology. pp. 129.
  4. Chae SI. 2005. Social Science Research Methodology. B&M Books, Seoul. pp. 530.
  5. Choi GH. 2012. A Study on the Effect Analysis of Forest Healing. Master Thesis, Chonbuk National University. pp. 72.
  6. Choi YE, Lee JA, and Chun JH. 2013. A Comparative Study on the Preference and Visual Characteristics of Stream Landscape According to Hydromorpological Structures. Journal of Wetlands Research 15(3): 301-315. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2013.15.3.301
  7. Daniel TC, and Vining J. 1983. Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality. In: Altman I, and Wohwill J. (eds.) Behaviour and the Natural Environment. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 39-83.
  8. Go YS. 2009. A Forest Landscape Analysis of the Forest Roads in the Recreational Forests. Master Thesis, Sangji University. pp. 52.
  9. Hong SH. 2005. Evaluation of Restored Landscape of Dam-Side Slope Water Level Alteration Section. Master Thesis, Cheongju University. pp. 64.
  10. Hyeon JS. 2000. Mountain System: There is a Genealogy in the Mountain in Our Country. Pulbit Publishing. pp. 347.
  11. Joo, SH, and Im SB. 2003. A Study on the Landscape Adjectives for Urban Landscape Analysis. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(1): 1-10.
  12. Joo, SH, and Lee SH. 2012. Analysis of Characteristics of Urban Stream Landscape by landscape adjectives. The Journal of Korea Planning Association 47(4): 49-63.
  13. Jung SG, Kang DH, and S JY. 2015. An Analysis of the Image and Visual Preference of a Light Rail Pier according to Aesthetic Styles. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(4): 15-26. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.4.015
  14. Kang MH, and Kim SG. 2010. Development of Evaluation indices for Forest Landscape Classification. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(6): 777-784.
  15. Kim TJ. 1999. Sutdies on the Scenic Perception Characteristics of Forest Landscape Images. Journal of Korean Society for Plants, People and Environment 2(1): 24-31.
  16. Kim TK, and Kim CS. 2009. An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Landscape of Gyeong Po Lake and the Establishment of Criteria for Height Control. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(2): 104-113.
  17. Kim YM. 2011. A Study on the Eco-Geomorphological and Aesthetical Evaluation of Urban Stream Landscape. Master Thesis, Chonnam National University. pp. 64.
  18. Korea Forest Research Institute(KFRI). 2004. A study on Management of Forest Recreation and Landscape Resources. Research report, KFRI.
  19. Korea Forest Research Institute(KFRI). 2012. Survey on Forest Landscape resources and Landscape planning. Research report, KFRI.
  20. Korea Forest Service(KFS). 2008. A Study on the Establishment of Forest Landscape Belt.
  21. Korea Forest Service(KFS). 2009. Master plan for Management of Forest Landscape. pp. 66.
  22. Korea Forest Service(KFS). 2013. The Casebook for Forest Ecological Restoration. pp. 311.
  23. Lee JG, and Kim JS. 2006. A Study on the Forest Scenery Preference. Proceedings of Korean Forest Society Summer Conference 435-436.
  24. Lee KC. 2008. A Study on Effects of Residents' Local Image through and Urban Stream Restoration. Master Thesis, The University of Seoul. pp. 112.
  25. Lee TW. 2013. A Study on the Preference Analysis of Retaining Wall Landscape Image to Raw Material. Master Thesis, Hanyang University. pp. 96
  26. Min SH, Lee CY, and Joo WY. 2014. A Study on the Effects of Soundscapes on Forest Landscape Preference. Journal of Korean Forest Society 103(3): 473-482. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.3.473
  27. Park YD, Kwon TH, and Ma HS. 2016. Ecological Monitoring on Changes in Microclimate, Vegetation and Soil Properties after 2 Years in Restoration Project Sites Linking the Ridgeline of Baekdudaegan. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science 50(1): 125-136.
  28. Ryu JS. 2012. A Study on the Extraction of Vocabulary and Image Analysis for Evaluating Urban and Rural Landscape. Master Thesis, Chungnam National University. pp. 103.
  29. Song HS, and Oh DK. 2003. Visual Preference Evaluation of Forest Stands toward Forest Working Systems. Journal of Agricultural Science of Chungnam National University 30(2): 139-147.
  30. Song JJ. 2008. Statistical Analysis Method for Writing Paper based on SPSS AMOS. 21c Publishing, Gyeonggi. pp. 369.
  31. Suh JH, Kim SB, Rho JH, and Huh J. 2009. A Comparative Analysis on Image Structures of Jeju 'Oreum' between Koreans and Foreigners. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(1): 65-77.
  32. Zube EH, Sell JL, and Taylor J. 1982. Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory. Landscape Planning 9: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0

피인용 문헌

  1. 백두대간 마루금 복원사업지에서의 5년 경과 후 토양특성 및 소나무 생장 모니터링 vol.33, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13047/kjee.2019.33.4.453